This is a fairly uneven selection, with a few really memorable pieces and a few that I'm surprised even made consideration for any "best of" series. Fittingly, a number of pieces remind us how the Trump administration turned the clock back on so many positive things, as these pieces were in many cases reported on in 2017 and published in 2018. They are reminders of the evil of that regime and how its stupidity, racism, and utter stupidity damaged everything from precious nature reserves to international cooperation to civil rights. You realize all this when you're living in the US, but you are reminded of the scope of it when you read travel pieces that, by their very nature, are about more long-term matters.
The book opens strongly with a piece on Guantanamo that reveals a lot of surprises about the site and reminds us that Americans were basically banned from going to Cuba by Trump, after things were finally opened up. There's another piece about Cuba as well, a more touristy one, that is charming.
The second piece is one of the hardest-hitting, an angry Black woman's walking journey from Selma, AL to Montgomery, AL, to retrace one of the iconic walks of the Civil Rights Movement. I've driven the route and visited sites in both of the cities, and she's spot-on in writing about both the growing pride among some people over what was accomplished and the ongoing attempt by private citizens to hide or downplay it. I really like this piece as well because it's something that a typical American can do, rather than the pieces that are about traveling to some exotic corner of China or Russia. Those latter trips are expensive and extremely time-consuming, beyond the means of most of us.
On the subject of Russia, the piece about visiting Chernobyl is pretty cool. In a pre-COVID world, that would seem to be an incredibly dangerous idea: go to a place full of radiation. Now we know that just getting there would probably make you sick.
Unfortunately, about midway through the book, the selections are pedestrian and rather obvious. The one about water trips down the Rio Grande has been done a lot, as even the author of the article acknowledges by citing books and articles by prior explorers. The fact that his trip is only about 5 days on a small section of the river (trips have taken about 90 days of canoeing and portage) adds to my wonder about why this story is included. But given Trump's hatred of Mexico and intentions to create a barrier wall, I guess there needed to be something about the topic in a book published at that time. There's another Trumpy story in which a reporter visited about a half-dozen of his prestige properties and found them to be rather mundane. They were pretty much all empty as well, except for a Vancouver hotel that had a lot of wealthy Chinese tourists (and I would imagine the Chinese soured on Trump by the end of his regime). That's sort of a fun article, though the author incorrectly states more than once his prediction that the Trump administration will end with a whimper, not a bang (or an insurrection and criminal trials). Let's just say I'm not looking at that reporter for this year's Super Bowl prediction!
A few stories were disappointments, especially one about bachelorette parties in Nashville. As a parent of a daughter who's in bachelorette season, I was expecting a fun sendup of the whole thing. Instead, it's a repetitive complaint that the parties have expanded beyond Nashville's Music Row and into neighborhoods where the women rent Air BnBs. This is sort of an interesting point -- that the search for authenticity as tourists is ruining the authentic areas for its residents (a point made in a thousand articles about Paris, Amsterdam, etc.) -- but it's stated about six times. Also restated at least four times is that there's a mural of wings at which every bride-to-be wants to be photographed, and that people will wait up to 90 minutes to get their perfect Instagram photo. It only needed to be said once.
I hated a story about lionfish and the people who hunt them off the Florida coast. I don't hate lionfish nor people who kill them because their invasive predators. I hated the style of the article, which was a macho, staccato retread of "Rolling Stone" journalism of 50 years ago. The article was published in "Smithsonian," and maybe that's a fresh style for a stodgy magazine, but the editor of this volume should have known better. Another clunker was about chili peppers, which was so dull that I didn't even finish it.
Of course, in any compilation volume people have their favorites and stuff they dislike. If you're interested in US travel, there isn't much here that's good. The Alabama the Trump resort pieces are quite good. If you are interested in China or Russia, there's good stuff on both, with the China pieces focused on people (searching for the family's home village, how China takes dissidents on tours during politically sensitive times) and the Russia ones on the environment (death of reindeer in the tundra, Chernobyl). And the Caribbean gets its due, including a piece on hurricanes that is particularly eerie as we seem to be getting more and more severe hurricane seasons. The best pieces are ominous, not a lot of fun and light to be found in this edition, and maybe that's what tourism has become --- a window into the scary parts of our future.