A very good (enjoyable, informative) piece of biography (and, more broadly, history and sports/cycling history) that also makes a nice contribution to a nice, diverse, growing literature that (effectively, importantly) reminds us how horrific the nation's history is with regard to race (in this case, in particular, between the Civil War and the Civil Rights movement).
If you're not inclined to pick up a book about bicycle racing, may I suggest you consider the book instead as another opportunity to gain familiarity with our oft-ignored history of race and racism. In that context, I might comfortably shelve this book alongside Isabel Wilkerson's monumental Warmth of Other Suns, Gilbert King's Pulitzer Prize winning Devil in the Grove, or maybe even David Grann's stunning Killers of the Flower Moon (although that might be a stretch).
As cycling books go, it's a very different animal ... and, frankly, I don't think Kranish was writing for cyclists, which, admittedly, is a small slice of the reading public. Had he been doing so, I expect there would have been more of a head nod to Nelson Vails, the 1984 Olympian (and, I believe, the first African American to medal is a cycling discipline). For cyclists (or fans) who read cycling history - and more broadly, for cyclists (or fans) that religiously followed Vails, Major Taylor was was a major historical figure and, in many ways, a benchmark.
As cycling biographies go, this reminded me most of Aili McConnon's (to my mind) well-worth-reading Road to Valor (which, of course, covers a different rider, during a later era - the early Grand Tour years ... and, of course, WWII, in a very different setting (Italy)). But the two books are similar in that, while they cover bicycle racing, the biographical subjects become bigger (and more important) than just cycling or riders or racers. And, well, until his autobiographical books (largely written by/with Sally Jenkins) had to be moved from the non-fiction to the fiction shelves, Lance Armstrong - for his important and impressive work in the cancer community - was in a similar circle. But I digress...
I understand why the publisher is marketing the book as in the tradition of Seabiscuit or Boys in the Boat ... and, yes, they are similar in construction and scope and aspiration. And, yes, both Seabiscuit and Boys in the Boat are, arguably, sports history books. But, as much as I enjoyed this book (and recommend it strongly), I'm hard pressed to conclude that it belongs in the same tier. To be clear, the story is compelling, the history is incredibly well sourced and supported by a wealth of research, and the author deserves praise for the work as a whole. But I just don't see the book gaining the popularity of either Seabiscuit or Boys in the Boat - to my mind, it just wasn't as artfully presented, it didn't read quite as smoothly, and, at one level, it was easier to put down (although I did plow through it quite quickly).
Still, I strongly recommend it, and I'm glad I read it.