This is a book I picked up somewhere--probably a library book sale. Skimming around in it, I discovered some things I did not know about the Civil War. Author Clint Johnson writes about 50 people in the ACW-Union and Confederate- who were rather obscure but affected the war in some way, either positively or negatively.
So no Lee or Beauregard or Forrest--or Grant, Sherman, Burnside or Custer. But Sec. of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase is included as an obscure figure. He shouldn't be. The author considers him a "misfire." This is due to his plotting against Lincoln, which came to nothing. I think his work as Sec. of the Treasury should be regarded as a major "bull's-eye" for the Union. He ensured that the Union was well-financed during the Civil War.
One of my favorite figures of the war is Lew Wallace, famous as the author of "Ben Hur," and not as a military leader of the Civil War. The title of the chapter about him states it quite simply about his contribution: "The Man Who Saved Washington." Definitely a "bull's -eye," the amateur ( not a professional and West Pointer) Wallace was unfairly blamed for Gen. US Grant's defeat on the first day of the horrific Battle of Shiloh, Tennessee ( in the author's opinion, which I agree with). He was sidelined and finally put in command of the "Middle Department," including Washington, DC. When a Confederate army under CS Gen. Jubal Early drove toward Washington, it was Lew Wallace who was able to rush troops to try to stop Early and protect the US capital. Wallace was outnumbered and defeated in the Battle of Monocacy, Maryland on July 9, 1864 but his heroic action delayed the Southerners. He gave Grant the precious time he needed to reinforce the defenses of Washington. When Early got to DC, he could not break through the defenses and was forced to retreat. Wallace was certainly the man who saved Washington, DC. As the author points out, a quick raid into the capital city just might have captured Lincoln--and then what would've happened? We'll never know, thanks to Lew Wallace.
By the way, I have visited the Monocacy National Battlefield-- a beautiful park near Frederick, Maryland and certainly worth a visit!
Another man who should be better known and who was a real bull's- eye for the CSA was Colonel George Rains. Rains was more of a businessman than a soldier and, with great efficiency, kept the Confederacy supplied with gunpowder. The South would've lost the war much earlier than it did if not for the great productivity of his powder mill at Augusta, Georgia.
Who was Major John Barry? A good officer from North Carolina, but he goes down in history in this book as a "misfire." He believed that the volley he ordered during the Battle of Chancellorsville, Virginia, was aimed at the Yankees. His troops, firing at Barry's command, mortally wounded "Stonewall" Jackson. Interestingly, Barry was not blamed for the death of the South's great hero, Stonewall. In fact, he was promoted from major to full colonel.
i had heard of Gen. John B. Floyd of Virginia and I am certainly willing to consider him one of the worst misfires of the entire war, perhaps the worst for the South. He was entrusted with the defense of strategic Fort Donelson, Tenn. After the fort was surrounded by Grant's forces, Floyd was able to escape with some of his troops. He left behind 15,000 Confederates, who were then surrendered to Grant. With his victory at Fort Donelson, Grant began his rise to become the commanding general of all US armies. For his disgusting display of cowardice, Floyd was relieved of Confederate command by President Jefferson Davis. Amazingly, the Virginia state government gave Floyd command of state troops in the southwestern part of Virginia. Floyd now rests beneath a tombstone that bears a Bible verse which asks, "Why was I ever born?" Why, indeed.
There are forty-five other bull's-eyes and misfires, North and South.
I found one mistake in the book. The Battle of Sayler's Creek, Virginia, is stated as having been fought on April 2, 1865. It was on April 6, 1865. I don't know how many other mistakes there are in the book that I didn't catch. For that reason, I give the book 3 stars rather than 4.