The author is a big proponent of reading recovery and does not support skills-based interventions that do not involve a great amount of reading. (I ordered an RTI book from the literacy project and I can’t wait to read it and see what the thoughts are in that book. I am guessing they will be different, due to what this book says versus what we’ve been learning in the literacy project.) This book is based on a large study done by Kaplan et al. I looked up the study to see if the book was representing it correctly, and it was. Reading Recovery was the only program that was shown to be effective for beginning reading students in all four domains: alphabetics, fluency, comprehension, and general reading achievement. Most of the other programs that we have on campus, such as vowac and Barton, did not have enough research to justify any findings. LindaMood had a small positive effect size.
The author states that students with low reading skills can’t be remediated in less than 30 minutes each day for first grade and 45 minutes or more daily for older students, up to an hour of intense intervention each day for fourth grade and beyond. His ideal model for a 30-minute intervention is 5 minutes of phonics, 20 minutes of reading books at the student’s current instructional level (not grade level books), and 5 minutes of comprehension. (He also believes that below-level students should not spend the rest of their days in classrooms in which the books are higher than their reading level.) He also points to research that shows that 1 is the ideal group size for the most progress, and more than 3 leads to no progress at all.
He compares skill-based interventions that don’t have enough reading as trying to teach somebody to ride a bicycle by repeatedly going over the parts of the bicycle without letting them ride the bicycle. He says, “Unfortunately, small group interventions are too often designed [the opposite of his model] with 20 minutes of teaching and 10 minutes of reading. I think it’s because reading teachers and special education teachers feel the need to teach the kids everything they are not understanding, but the kids end up being taught all the time and are never allowed the necessary amount of practice, and most of them are not going to practice at home” (p. 67).
One interesting fact that the author points out is related to the issue of learned helplessness. Many of us know from experience that many students who go to pull-out programs, such as title and special education, oftentimes demonstrate learned helplessness. They put forth little metacognitive effort in doing the work; they just wait until the teacher tells them the answer. I always assumed that this is because they have spent so much time in classes in which the work was too hard for them. But this author points to the teachers in the pull-out programs themselves as causing the learned helplessness problem: “Perhaps this is because these close encounters with struggling readers allow us to interfere more often while they read” (141). The author encourages teaching students to use metacognitive strategies and then helping them use them.
He talks about the positive research on training students to use personal questioning strategies while reading and offers these: “Questions that foster discussion: What were you thinking about right after you finished reading this text? Are there topics you need more information about to better understand this text? Think about the questions you had as you read this text. Tell us about one of those questions. Did this text remind you of other books you’ve read?” (p. 133).
He shares information from Ellin Keene, who has written about how the wording of questions matters. On page 135, he shares her findings that asking, “See if you can think of a question about the story,” will yield fewer and poorer responses than, “Think about all the questions you have and then pick one or two that you think will help us understand the story.”
The author shares these on page 136—
“Useful Strategies for Struggling Readers’ Intervention Lessons
Summarization: Teach struggling readers strategies for summarizing texts of different sorts.
Story grammar/Graphic organizers: Show struggling readers how to use story grammar or other sorts of graphic organizers (e.g. Venn diagram, timeline) to identify important themes in a text.
Question generating/Answering: Develop struggling readers’ ability to generate useful and powerful questions as they read a text and how to answer those questions.
Prior knowledge/Prediction: Demonstrate how you activate your background knowledge before you begin reading and how you generate predictions about the text.
Imagery: Visualization is one of those useful strategies we all use when reading. We imagine (visualize) what characters look like and how they are dressed. We create mental images of the settings including the rural environment on the plains where the little house on the prairie stood all those years ago.”
A questionable part was at the end when the author questioned the reality of dyslexia. He stated that, if those diagnosed with dyslexia would have gotten basic instruction but at an older age than their peers, they would not have dyslexia as adults. Based on what I’ve heard and read, that does not seem to be accurate.