The availability of DNA testing has proven that too many innocent people are locked up for crimes they didn't commit, spending their prime years in cells with no one believing their claims of innocence. Surviving Justice brings together the stories of 13 innocent men and women, in their own words, many of whom were exonerated and released because of exculpatory DNA tests after collectively serving dozens of years . You think to yourself, 'This could never happen to me. I'm a good person and I've never had any problems with the law!' Most of the contributors would've thought the same.
These stories highlight the potential stages at which the system fails the accused: indifferent and incompetent defense lawyers assigned to the indigent, cops who manhandle victims and coerce erroneous statements, imprisoned snitches looking for leniency from prosecutors, police departments negligently handling evidence, the reliance on unscientifically reliable tests, and police room interrogations that manipulate the accused to extract false confessions. Justice can easily break down at each of these nodes, and being black or brown or poor leaves you with fewer institutional resources to prove your innocence.
This book is heartbreaking. While it's certainly the minority of convicted who are guiltless, a system that so casually allows so many innocent people to be stripped of their lives and futures is reprehensible. Their stories underscore just how disinterested many of the actors in the justice system are in actually achieving justice. They might wait for years before DNA evidence is allowed into the case, and could languish in prison for months despite a judge's vacating order simply because it was 'untimely' politically.
A roundtable of 6 exonerees was held and written up, which allowed for freer conversation among the participants, but seemed to recycle a lot of the material included in their personal autobiographies which comprise the bulk of the book. I didn't find this section to be particularly illuminating above and beyond the personal writings.
Appendix A is highly recommended, and addresses a range of causes for wrongful conviction. The book adopts the unconventional method of liberally sprinkling footnotes with references to these entries throughout the book, which I particularly liked and found useful. For example, a participant in their personal memoir will describe an interrogation encounter with the police, and the reader is helpfully informed that a backgrounder on interrogations is available on page 4XX.