'Ann Vickers' by Sinclair Lewis is surprising! It is about a very educated woman who lived her life as a progressive activist. What is so surprising about that? The book was published in 1932.
Ann grows up in small Waubanakee, Illinois. Her father is the Superintendent of Schools. Her mother died when she was ten years old. She has several boyfriends who teach her about love and relationships. Ann attends college frequently, taking breaks between degrees, learning a lot more about life and socialist/progressive organizations and bureaucracies and the people who run them. She eventually becomes Dr. Vickers, an esteemed reformer of prisons. Before that, as a young woman living in New York City after her father dies, she has a series of jobs working for socialist and progressive organizations.
She worked as a suffragette and is arrested during a protest. She spends a few days in jail. She gets a job managing a 'settlement house' during WWII which offers a variety of services to poor people. She has a love affair with a military man who leaves her pregnant. She gets an illegal abortion. She works for a rich woman running a private charity. She goes on a vacation alone to England by boat, trying to decide what to do next, meeting people, seeing poor sections of London. She remembers her time spent in jail and decides to take up the cause of reforming prisons. She sees horrible things in the prisons for women. She writes a book about prison reform. She meets a man, Russell Spaulding, whom she marries. It is a dull marriage for her. Eventually she ends up with an extremely educated and intelligent judge, Barney Dolphin, married to Mona. Ann has a baby, not knowing if it's her husband's or the judge's. Ann is forty years old!
The surprise, of course, is this fictional biography of Ann Vickers is taking place during the early 1920's and 1930's. Was it simply an aspirational novel about a feminist, invented by Lewis? I read it is somewhat based on the lives of his two wives. Wow, right? That said, I had a difficult time finishing the book. The novel has a tone of smart-aleck cynicism throughout, a sort of clever proto-snarkiness, Lewis-style. It is much too intense and heavy-handed for a snarky-toned book, too humorless. For me, anyway. Still. A bildungsroman novel about a woman like this in the 1900's? Wow wow wow.
The sad part of course, is everything in the book is still true of today - same prejudices, same issues of poverty and prisons, same tremendous inequalities. Ann Vickers soldiers on through the battles in 1930, and we still are fighting through the same battles today in 2020.