Rating (All ratings use a Scale of 1-5) = 3 Stars
Blurb = 2. 5 due to no warnings
My Genre Scale = 5
Odds if not your genre = 1
Development of: =
*World = 3.5
*Plot = 3
*Characters = 2; to me they felt very 1 dimensional
What stood out = Nothing
Mood Type / Appeal to those looking for = A story featuring Vamps with others Supes and quite a few sex scenes.
Warnings = Torture scene quite graphic for those sensitive to it, but for me, not overly so.
HFN/HEA = Somewhat for the couple a HDN.
Series Notes = 1st of at least 3
*Reading on? Yes
*Reading back to back? N/A
*Can be easily read without the previous? N/A
Rating Notes = (SubPlots, thoughts, etc... ) The plot was interesting enough, but I never connected to the characters. I was entertained yet not engaged. I was instead just a casual observer, who had no problem putting the story down.
I am usually fine with fated mates and the Insta-love that often involves, but I struggled to really care about them as a couple even though I liked them as individuals. I never really felt it. It felt more like I was told about them, then I saw their love / bond. It felt like everything just moved to quickly friendships, events etc... So I guess it was a lack of depth, but it wasn't bad.
**************
Below is my philosophy on reviewing!
***************
1. I try to take into account and note common pet peeves often bemoaned by others.
2. "Brain candy' does not necessarily carry a negative connotation. (What is brain candy? Publishing industry 's version of pop music - Typically: formulaic, from a prolific author published often and quickly (like monthly), things escalate fast, and are often solved easily etc..) It has its uses: to pass time whet tired, on the beach, etc... The problem comes when "brain candy" is unexpected or even disguised.
3. Blurb rating purpose:
Like many readers, I do not like to think I'm reading one kind of story; just to end up with another. But...I also don't think a book should be docked stars for being as stated. If I don't like stories about "_________", and I choose to read it; I shouldn't give it 2 stars based JUST on my preferences. Unless... it wasn't clear in the blurb.
4. Other Factors that effect my perspective when reviewing:
Since 2009, I have exclusively read m/m. My 1st was in 2007. I am a Kindle diehard, and I never do audio for m/m. I read at least 100+ books a year - with an average length of 220± pages; but the total number of books is usually much higher. My Goodreads lifetime rating (at the start of 2021) was a 3.64 average for 1527 books. Which considering, one should be better at picking out books the more one reads, I feel is an accurate average. I have over 795 reviews within the m/m genre here on Goodreads.