Read Oct 2022. 90th book of the year.
..........................................
Says the back cover: “Portis spins an extraordinary novel of deep longing and comic eloquence.”
Extraordinary?
Well, keep in mind it’s the same marketing dept. person who claims “The trail leads from Arkansas down to Mexico and into Honduras.” Wrong country. It’s British Honduras (now Belize, since 1973), 857.3 klicks down the road from Honduras. Picky maybe. But me? I’d want a copy writer who took more than just a glance at the book he/she was describing.
Anyways … this sure was a disappointment. 2 point five measly stars.
Sure, I’d love to check that middle box, three stars, to escape controversy, evade “WOT?!” responses from those who top-rated this book. But honestly, for me, it’s a 2.5 at best. In my defense a few of my friends gave it a 2.
I did quite like, though, his other novel, Norwood. 4 stars. I didn’t have much to say about it back in 2017, but some of my spare remarks are revealing:
“One of those books where the protagonist wanders the country, engages in misadventures, and plot is secondary to the cast of colorful characters.”
Much the same could be said for The Dog of the South. A very similar kind of book. Trouble is, I thought the narrator, Ray Midge, was kinda dull. The character’s voice is not distinctive, and he has little flair for description. It’s first person narration (Norwood was third person, as I recall), and I suppose Portis chose a relatively bland narrator to contrast with the rest of the cast of exuberantly colorful, eccentric characters. Fine, but he maybe overdid it. This guy is not interesting. The story is set in the late 60s or early 70s (before 1973 anyway) when the narrator would be termed a bit of "a square, man.” No judgment, just an observation. He’s 26 but he hates hippies, rock n roll, and even guitars. In an amusing moment, he passes on going to a party because he fears there will be guitars. He travels from Arkansas to British Honduras (now Belize) and very rarely describes the people or environment with any kind of specificity at all. Okay, I like, but I don’t need, on every page, Cormac McCarthy-like descriptions, mountains like reefs in the distance and what have you. But one or two mild attempts in the book to give me a tiny bit of a feel for the environment and the people would’ve been nice.
Speaking of which, Roy Blount Jr.’s blurb says, “Charles Portis could be Cormac McCarthy if he wanted to, but he’d rather be funny.” That could be, I suppose. Though a difficult premise to prove, I submit. Maybe he could be, but I found no evidence of it in this book. And I didn’t find this book particularly funny either. (Norwood was quite different. For one thing, it has a third person narrator who didn’t bore me. And it was funny. )
I wish I’d saved some quotes in my 2017 review of Norwood, but I did write, “Its special strength is the dialogue, which at times is hilarious.”
Some reviewers found Dog of the South hilarious as well. I didn’t. When I’ve finished a book, it’s usually full of pencil marks: notable passages marked. Notes about the themes or characters. But this book came out clean. I remembered chuckling lightly here and there, so I skimmed the reviews, read all the saved quotes for Portis, trying to find them and maybe others I might’ve somehow missed. Here’s the best of the best.
“A lot of people leave Arkansas and most of them come back sooner or later. They can’t quite achieve escape velocity.”
“When you run up against a policeman at a typewriter, you might as well get a Coke and relax.”
Decent lines, sure.
On a personal note, I also liked when someone said, there are no characters named Ray in the bible. Of course, that’s true also of Bob. Carl. Skip. Jason …
And I liked the relationship that develops between the narrator and a Belizean boy. The stand off against the narrator’s nemesis was sort of amusing. Piles of rocks gathered, tossed at the guy’s shack. Never mind that the narrator knows the other guy is quite disturbed (arrested for threatening the president) and has a shotgun. But he brings two boys along to fight with him anyway. Still a somewhat amusing scene. A couple of positives elevating it from 2 to 2.5.
Again, I really liked Norwood. I remain interested in True Grit. I would be surprised if that one disappoints.