I hate to give this book such a low writing, but it failed for me all over the place.
First - very short book with a hardcover, most of the pages taken up by large comics with incredibly tiny, difficult to read text. The quality of the comics was personally quite "meh" for me - frankly overly comical and I didn't love the general inking style but that's going to be a totally subjective matter. A larger book (both in length, page size, and font size) with a soft cover would have been far more worth the money (thankfully I bought it used). The writing is incredibly hard to read due to how small and tight the font is. The font within the comics is also very small (no hand lettering). I had to hold the book right up to my face the entire reading, which wasn't comfortable, and the comic font was also incredibly confusing. It's difficult to tell when/if someone is being directly quoted versus when the words within the comic are just an explanation or loose reenactment, which isn't ideal in a history book.
The book is too brief on essentially all topics. There would be a brief reference to this or that with essentially no way to contextualize it and then you were off again. Yes, I could muddle through most of it, but as someone who usually has zero difficulty sorting context out in fiction and/or nonfiction works, I don't know who this book is for because it's frankly hard to get through due to the choppiness of the text never giving you a full picture.
The book also falls short in the places I do know my history - again, a longer book would have been better. Glaring absences are things like using "LGBTQI" and leaving off the A and + which are both important issues in today's feminism/queerness, etc. There's a comic that I can't tell if it's satirical or sincere (I unfortunately think it was a sincere portrayal of a more equal home) when a man talks about how he does the housework because his job is less important because it's part time. I don't think we should put up with that sort of shit when it's said about women working part-time and I don't think it's appropriate to then extrapolate it to men taking part in household work. Plenty of part-time jobs are harder physically and/or mentally compared to some full-time work and declaring that part-timers do all the housework as a good example of equality misses the ball.
Again, the book is simply too choppy, too scattershot, and too short to really be a good history - it goes beyond brief and into utterly lacking. On top of that, the book has zero reference pages. So again, it's hard to determine what's a direct quote and what's a funny comic aside and you can't even properly dig into references where you need/want more info. Not a book I'll end up keeping.