Yes indeed, there are parts of Peter Berresford Ellis’ Celtic Myths and Legends which I have very much enjoyed, if not in fact adored. And with that in mind and first and foremost, how Berresford Ellis has selected and then how he has retold, how the author has penned his collection of Irish, Manx, Scottish, Welsh, Cornish and Breton tales in Celtic Myths and Legends has definitely been wonderfully extensive and with in my humble opinion also just enough included description and exposition, albeit that I will also want to revisit these stories sometime in the future for a more detailed and intensive perusal, as this time around I was kind of mainly skimming through Celtic Myths and Legends (because I was under considerable time restraints). But I do have to wonder just a tiny bit why with regard to Celtic mythology in general, Peter Berresford Ellis has not at the very least listed in the introduction to Celtic Myths and Legends some of the many deities present in specifically the continental European Celtic pantheon. Because even though with regard to Celtic mythology and legends, it is of course true that it is generally the insular Celtic stories (and Breton actually originated not in France but in England) that have been preserved in writing, the continental European Celts of course also had their mythology and legends, and in my opinion, Peter Berresford Ellis should at the very least be listing some of the known from inscriptions gods and goddesses such as Belenus, Toutatis etc.
However, while for me, the text proper, the main collection of myths and legends to be encountered in Celtic Myths and Legends is definitely spectacular and highly recommended, the accompanying introduction certainly and in my humble opinion leaves quite a bit to be desired. For instead of presenting a clear and concise general portrait of Celtic history and culture, Peter Berresford Ellis falls into quite the same trap as he always does under his pseudonym of Peter Tremayne for his Sister Fidelma series of early Medieval Irish mysteries, engaging in a huge and often rather confusing amount of information dropping, rambling on and on ad nauseum instead of providing with his introductory words to Celtic Myths and Legends a clearly delineated and not too wordy text. And yes, also penned tediously and with so much at times rather superfluous seeming details upon details that after ploughing through the introduction for Celtic Myths and Legends I actually ended up needing to put the book away for some days before starting with the actual myths and legends (something that I do think might negatively affect reading pleasure and in fact, I do not really recommend Peter Berresford Ellis’ introduction, I really only recommend reading the actual collected tales found in Celtic Myths and Legends, and for secondary research on the Celts and on Celtic history and culture the detailed bibliography, although I do kind of find it presumptive and a bit arrogant how many of his own titles Peter Berresford Ellis is listing).