What do you think?
Rate this book


512 pages, Hardcover
Published September 17, 2019
The idea of the Chinese philosopher conceiving of his trade as butchery or cookery might raise an eyebrow. Nevertheless, I believe some things ring true in the metaphor. The dividing line running through ancient China's intellectual landscape was not one between rationalists and idealists, or between those who believed or disbelieved in the forces of the supernatural; it was not between adherents of logic or advocates of intuition, or between those who developed theories of knowledge and those skeptical of it. "To carve or not to carve" was the question that exercised the thinking minds of ancient China. The point of departure for most intellectual traditions we have encountered in this book lay here: do we gain more from life by cutting up the world into units or categories we can control, manipulate and (pretend to) understand, or is human existence better served if we leave the world intact to operate following its own internal and spontaneous logic? Is it better to alter or adapt, be in or out, engage or withdraw? Is our inner self best left untouched, like an uncarved block, or should we work and sculpt it? And when we fashion ourselves and society around us, what shape should it take? Crucially, through it all, how do we preserve the harmony of the whole and the integrity of the one: the self, the family, the state, the monarch, the empire, Heaven, the cosmos, the Way? To most, then, thinking Chinese meant focusing on society, politics and the ethics of the here and now. The shape of the cleaver mattered little as long as it could cut. Perhaps not much has changed. (pp. 431-33)