Losing the Nobel Prize: A Story of Cosmology, Ambition, and the Perils of Science's Highest Honor

by Brian Keating

What would it have been like to be an eyewitness to the Big Bang? In 2014, astronomers wielding BICEP2, the most powerful cosmology telescope ever made, thought they’d glimpsed the spark that ignited the Big Bang. Millions around the world tuned in to the announcement, and Nobel whispers began to spread. But had these cosmologists truly read the cosmic prologue or, driven by ambition in pursuit of Nobel gold, had they been deceived by a galactic mirage?


In Losing the Nobel Prize, cosmologist Brian Keating—who first conceived of the BICEP (Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization) experiments—tells the inside story of BICEP2’s detection and the ensuing scientific drama. Along the way, Keating provocatively argues that the Nobel Prize actually hampers scientific progress by encouraging speed and competition while punishing inclusivity, collaboration, and bold innovation. To build on BICEP2’s efforts to reveal the cosmos’ ultimate secrets—indeed, to advance science itself—the Nobel Prize must be radically reformed.

Genres: Science, Nonfiction, Biography, Physics, Audiobook, History, Space

368 pages, Paperback

First published April 24, 2018

About the author

Brian Keating is a professor of physics at the Center for Astrophysics & Space Sciences in the Department of Physics at the University of California, San Diego. He is a public speaker, inventor, and an expert in the study of the universe’s oldest light, the cosmic microwave background (CMB), using it to learn about the origin and evolution of the universe. Keating is a pioneer in the search for the earliest physical evidence of the inflationary epoch] the theorized period of expansion of space in the early universe directly after the Big Bang. Physicists predict that this evidence will reveal itself as a particular pattern in the way CMB light is polarized. This pattern is referred to as a B-mode pattern and the BICEP2 experiment claimed to observe it in 2014. This episode is the subject of Keating's first book, Losing the Nobel Prize.

Reviews

[Brian Keating · Rating 5 out of 5]

Today, I submitted submitted my book for publication by W. W. Norton! I’m beyond thrilled that advance review copy readers have already started giving it high-praise.

Why did I write this book, a work that will most likely have harsh implications for my career?

First, wanted to give the public an insider's glimpse into the inner workings of the world's most prestigious (and opaque) accolade.

Second, while the Nobel Prize began with the noble vision of ‘benefiting all of mankind’, today it distorts the perception of science, turning it into a spectacle with wannabes and aspirants engaged in a bloodsport competition every bit as ferocious as the world’s most ambitious politicians wage.

Third, the book is part of a new platform; a community to give voice to the many scientists left out of the Nobel Prizes conversation. The prizes create a distorted narrative that no longer reflects how science gets done. It is my hope that the Nobel Prize can be reformed to better represent the broad and diverse panorama that is modern science. Please visit us at:

http://losingthenobelprize.org

For indeed, the Nobel Prize is the world’s closest held monopoly and it has a legendary power to intoxicate scientists. As Nobel Laureate Paul Samuelson said, “Scientists are as avaricious and competitive as Smithian businessmen. The coin they seek is not apples, nuts, and yachts; nor is it the coin itself, or power as that term is ordinarily used. Scholars seek fame from the other scientists whom they respect and whose respect they strive for.”

Fourth, I wanted to take readers on an epic quest from the bottom of the world to the beginning of time. Along the way, I hope my readers will be as fascinated as I am as we ruminate on the otherworldly vistas that modern cosmology reveals!

Lastly, I wrote this book as a letter to a younger version of myself, someone who has grown up in gladiatorial combat with other type a high-achievers who want to earn the world’s ultimate A+.

Why did I call it “Losing the Nobel Prize”? Well, originally I was going to call it “Killing Nobel” But Bill O’Reilly beat me to it.

In all seriousness, there are many “victory lap” books written by historians or laureates and more than a few with titles like “How to Win a Nobel Prize”. But, as with other accolades, like the Oscars or Olympics, there are far fewer winners than competitors. This book aims to give an accounting of a scientist seeking his own “Promised Land”, and while he came up short, he realized that the real Prize was the journey itself.

[Kate · Rating 2 out of 5]

This book was all over the place - I still don’t know what he was trying to write - a text for beginners in astronomy? A text of the history of astronomy? An autobiography? A tell-all of why he deserves the Nobel prize? A critique of the Nobel prize’s rules? A means to show off how many clever sub-titles he can come up with? And there’s a bit of religion, philosophy & even poetry thrown in.

There is certainly a lot of astronomical knowledge imparted - my favourite part was probably learning a little bit about some of the forgotten female astronomers.

Many of his gripes about the prize sound like a child learning that life is unfair. P. 221 ‘If the nobel Prize is a true meritocracy..’. Well, it’s not, is it? It’s a set of arbitrary rules made by a guy who died long ago & subjectively applied by a committee today.

It seems that his problems with this prize are also actually just symptoms of bigger, broader problems - why is the Nobel prize so sought after - the money, the prestige, the jobs, the grants the ability to run long term projects on your research interests forever after? Perhaps it is actually the scientific research system that is broken - why are so many good scientists forced to compete for such a small pool of funding? Why is the mode of demonstrating accomplishment ‘publish or perish’? Why are these projects in such fierce competition, when they would probably make much more progress, more efficiently and economically, if they collaborated -at least sometimes. Why isn’t there more funding for science? What models would support greater scientific research & advances? These are more interesting questions, I think. He does just barely touch on a few of these ideas, towards the end, and I particularly like how a collaboration forms between former competitors near the end - but it took the suggestion of their big potential bankroller to do it...

You end up almost feeling sorry for him - not for not winning a Nobel Prize (which he clearly was desperate for), but for being so obsessed with it. He seems baffled by other scientists who don’t appear fazed when they are passed over or missed out. I know it’s a big deal, and some of these scientific fields can be incredibly intense. But despite being someone who looks at the immensity of the universe for a living, he seems to miss the big picture - that prizes, even this big, are the icing, not the cake.

[David Brin · Rating 5 out of 5]

An extraordinary work of intellectual honesty. Astrophysicist Brian Keating explores the fascinating history and mixed effects of the Nobel Prize, especially on the field of physics. For a few years, Keating felt these effects, as people chattered about his own possible candidacy, before the chances and mischances of science changed course. That experience informs "Losing the Nobel." An amazing journey.

[Katherine Freese · Rating 5 out of 5]

Loved this book! It's a page-turner (not usually what I"d say about science books, but it's true).
It recounts the evolution of the experiment that led to recent claims of discovery of gravitational waves from the earliest moments of the Universe --- claims that later turned out to be (literally) dust. Keating's misgivings about the role of the Nobel Prize as a driver of scientists to rush to discovery make for thought-provoking reading.

The book starts with the major early figures in astronomy and cosmology. The arguments between the proponents of the Steady State and the Hot Big Bang models were resolved after decades of debate by data that proved the Hot Big Bang to be the correct picture of the Universe. The early history makes for interesting reading and includes the revolutionary contributions of Henrietta Leavitt, Margaret Burbidge, Vera Rubin and other women in astronomy. Then the book turns to the modern era of cosmology. Keating himself has played an important role in Cosmic Microwave Background science, learning about the Universe by studying the leftover light from the Big Bang. He talks about his push for the development of the BICEP detector at the South Pole. He describes the politics of the second generation of BICEP2, a collaboration led by other experimentalists. BICEP2's claims of discovery of gravitational waves from the Big Bang gave rise to incredible excitement in the world cosmology community and scientists were awarded prizes for the discovery. However, the data later proved to be contaminated by dust and the claims of discovery were incorrect. Keating talks about the dreams of the Nobel Prize that drove the experimenters and argues that the rush to get results can be damaging to careful and yet bold and innovative scientific inquiry. I agree with when he further argues that the limitations implemented by the Nobel Committee, that the prize should go to at most three winners per year and to living scientists only, are not official rules and are unfair to the many scientists who contribute to large collaborations. His discussion of the pros and cons of the role of the Nobel Prize in modern science make for an interesting backdrop for the story of the BICEP2 experiment. Throughout the book he brings in his own personal journey as a scientist, including amazing tales of trips to the South Pole for CMB science. Importantly, he highlights the random path of inquiry by which science actually gets done. Losing the Nobel Prize is a fast-paced fun book to read!

[Roo Phillips · Rating 2 out of 5]

2.5 stars. A solid missfire. An unfortunate missed opportunity. I wanted this book to be good. It has all the elements required for telling a compelling story about one of the bigger problems with science, but it turned out to be...just weird.

Brian Keating is an experimental cosmologist who built a telescope in the south pole (BICEP), and then went working on another telescope (POLARBEAR) after. During work on the second telescope, the group he left went on developing BICEP 2 without him. When BICEP 2 made a "discovery" worthy of the Nobel Prize in physics, Keating was upset he was so far down the list of contributors. Probably a quarter of this book is him whining about the fact that the other leads on BICEP 2 shared the spotlight and he did not (even though he wasn't really on the project). That is all there is to him "Losing the Nobel Prize" as his title suggests. Codswallop. He was never even a real contender.

The first half of this book your typical "history of the universe" many science books have that don't really have enough content to fill 300 pages. Kind of a waste of time given the thesis.

The second half of the book just covers his personal experimental research projects in detail, and the BICEP 2 project. The latter made a potential discovery: experimental evidence for cosmic inflation, a Nobel Prize worthy discovery. The announcement was made and everyone was thrilled, that is, until better science prevailed (as it eventually does). The Planck satellite was measuring the same thing as BICEP 2, but took fewer shortcuts, had better data, and was content with reaching the finish line second. Unfortunately for BICEP 2, a bit of bad science and poor motivation led to its downfall and potential for any prize. This was a good message from the book, but Keating's focus was more on him whining about not being mentioned in the press like he thought he should, and less on lessons to be learned on taking shortcuts in science in order to be first to a prize.

There was a smattering of Judaism weaved throughout the book. This was another distraction from the thesis, and it just felt like Keating wanted the world to know that he was religious.

There was probably slightly more references to the problems of, and solutions to winning the Nobel Prize as there were religious quotes and analogies. Honestly, if he focused only on the perils of the Nobel Prize, he probably had about one or two chapters worth of content. It is unfortunate because his experience ticked all the boxes for making a compelling case for serious scientific reform, and it mostly fizzled. Still, I'm glad that scientists are speaking more openly these days about root problems, often at great expense.

[Peter · Rating 5 out of 5]

Brian Keating’s Losing the Nobel Prize is a truly enlightening and engrossing read, especially for non-scientists interested in learning more about the history of astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology, as well as the allure of what is probably the most famous single prize in history.

Losing the Nobel successfully weaves together a number of themes and plotlines, including the history of ideas about the universe, its origin, and fate; Keating’s and his team’s relentless pursuit of Nobel-worthy work in cosmology; the complex, massively-expensive, and hyper-political nature of modern day research in physics; and a powerful critique of the Nobel Prize for Physics and recommendations as to how it could be reformed so as to both encourage and reward the best possible science in this new historical moment. The latter include calls for more public and private funding, more effective public engagement in science, and the need for more equity for women and historically underrepresented minorities in physics.

Keating’s book will also be a pleasure for non-scientist readers who, like me, are interested in wrapping their minds around the latest theories and discoveries in cosmology and astrophysics but who always eventually get lost in books by the like of Lisa Randall and Brian Greene.
That dust—DUST—is one of the book’s most fascinating characters is indicative of Keating’s deftness in telling the story of life, the universe, and everything. Very highly recommended.

[Antonio Garcia-Martinez · Rating 5 out of 5]

Our most august institutions--government, billion-dollar corporations, and even staid academia--are absolutely rife with human politicking, raw ambition, and more back-stabbing than anyone likes to talk about.

In 'Losing the Nobel Prize', Professor Brian Keating describes just some of that jockeying and maneuvering among the smartest people in the world, studying the most abstruse and fundamental knowledge, while chasing humanity's greatest honor. Along the way, Keating provides understandable explanations of the more mind-bending aspects of modern cosmology, and just how we know what the universe is made of, sitting here on the third rock out from an unremarkable star.

From the hushed redoubts of prestigious university offices, to the desolate, freezing wastes of Antarctica where many physics experiments are conducted, 'Losing the Nobel Prize' fills in the untold backstories of those who get to shake the Swedish king's hand with a medal around their necks, and those who didn't quite get there.

[Jill Courser · Rating 4 out of 5]

4.5 stars. 4 stars for the scientific chapters, but 5 stars for his chapters on the problems with the Nobel system interspersed throughout the book. A challenging blend of physics (in layman’s terms), memoir, and cultural criticism. The final two chapters on the ethical issues surrounding modern physics and his coming to terms with the pure joy of scientific inquiry (apart from prestigious awards) are excellent. Keating not only critiques the state of the Nobel Prize in Physics, but offers thoughtful suggestions for how the prize could be restored to the spirit Alfred Nobel originally intended. I try to read at least one book from contemporary science every year. Losing the Nobel Prize was well worth my time.

[Jon Kaufman · Rating 5 out of 5]

This book is a must-read for any budding young scientist or science enthusiast. It's a rare insider look at cutting-edge science (in Antarctica, no less!) and an exciting, yet controversial result. In this post-mortem, Dr. Keating deconstructs the Nobel prize as a concept and exposes its arbitrary and inconsistent rules, as well as its biases. He challenges the reader to consider how we regard the prize and how it has the potential to corrupt science.

Dr. Keating's sense of fun and humor are in full display and he possesses the rare ability to make a reader laugh while making them think.

[Ramin · Rating 3 out of 5]

Here's a brief excerpt of the review I published in Undark magazine today. If you're interested, please read the whole thing here: https://undark.org/article/book-revie...


In 2014, a team of astrophysicists excitedly made an announcement that received worldwide media attention. They claimed to have discovered evidence of primordial gravitational waves — confirming the theory of cosmic inflation, which proposed to explain how the universe rapidly expanded just moments after its tumultuous birth. It was a Nobel-worthy discovery — if only the team had been right.

In “Losing the Nobel Prize,” Brian Keating, a cosmologist at the University of California, San Diego — and a key player in the collaboration, known as BICEP2 — offers some painful post-mortems to explain where it went wrong.

Part of it was the rush to beat their competition, he argues, and part of it was the Nobel Prize itself. Keating dissects the Nobel’s shortcomings and offers his own recommendations for reforming the physics prize. He insists it’s not sour grapes; instead, he’s calling for long overdue changes without which the Nobel will continue to distort the public’s view of science...

[Nate Hansen · Rating 1 out of 5]

Nikola Tesla was a great man of science because he was a humble and excellent physicist. Issac Newton was a great man of science, because he was a humble and excellent mathematician.
Brian Keating may be a great scientist; this book didn't give me enough information one way or the other to convince me. For the time being, he has not revealed himself as a great man. Losing the Nobel Prize is meant to be a polemic against the way the Nobel Prize is administered. But Keating is so bogged down in his own personality that he muzzles the book from Go.

There are some scientists who are good writers, but Keating cannot claim to be among them. His book is a daisy chain of bad word play interlaced with constant references to other disciplines. In the comparatively compressed space of only 200 pages, Keating manages to compare himself to:

A) Robert F. Scott, the Polar explorer,
B) A marathon runner,
C) Michael Phelps, and
E) Literally Jesus. Yes, Jesus! Isn't that neat?

Between these comparisons (necessarily forced), he weaves together a story about going to the South Pole, measuring an aspect of the Cosmic Microwave Background, and using his data to make a run on the Nobel Prize. While the story is interesting enough in its own right, Mr. Keating makes so many excursus and asides that it keeps getting tripped up -- and it ends up completely distracting the reader from the main point of the book: the Nobel Prize.

After finishing this story, Mr. Keating goes on to talk about the aftermath of his experiment -- detailing its reception, data criticism, and his eventual loss of the Nobel. But much of this material is unnecessary and plodding, takes away even more from the book. The reader begins to suspect that Keating had to hit a word count and was inflating his writing. The confirmation comes when he includes -- by Shakespeare's grave, I do not lie -- a poem in the book. About dust. It does not impress.

In the end, Losing the Nobel Prize is a book perfect for the Philistines at Blinkist: it's eight times longer than it should be, its main argument is rhetorically hamstrung by several tons of needless weight, and it's own creator has sown the seeds of its failure. It would greatly benefit from being distilled down to a handful of bullet points. This is not a good book, and I cannot in good conscience recommend it to anyone I love.

[Jeff · Rating 1 out of 5]

Talk about sour grapes! Keating demonstrates there is little difference between scientists belting it out with each other to get the Nobel Prize and the headliners on Premier Boxing’s Saturday Night card. Boy, do things get bloody in the cosmology world.

I don’t understand cosmology and this book didn’t improve that. I had a lot respect for the Nobel Prize before I read this book. I still do. Some people get it; some don’t. But 300 pages of cosmology as a soap opera trying to sweetheart the Nobel Prize? Whew - I don’t have the time.

[Leonard · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is simply a book you have to read. Unlike many other science books, this particular book is so much more than knowledge being communicated, it is an experience shared. Dr. Keating makes cosmology comprehensible and enjoyable. Even better than this is the fact that Dr. Keating makes the entire book conversant. Simply put, you can hear Dr. Keating in the pages. I highly recommend Losing the Nobel Prize to any reader, as it transcends genre.

[Kalvin · Rating 2 out of 5]

Everyone I know working with the BICEP project hates this guy. And his writing is a bit self-indulgent. But, overall, the book weaves an explanation of complex cosmology into an interesting narrative and it kept me interested over the two days I read it. I am glad to know a bit more about the history of BICEP and I don't know of another resource that provides it.

[Andy Friedman · Rating 5 out of 5]

Astrophysicist and experimental cosmologist Brian Keating provides a rare behind the scenes view into the ultra competitive world of high stakes science, where both rivals and friends vie for the field's highest and most recognizable honor. Keating makes a compelling case that the lure of the Nobel Prize often results not in simply "the betterment of mankind", as Alfred Nobel himself originally wished, but instead often distorts the science and leaves many otherwise deserving scientists behind as the all too human motives and desires draw the participants more toward personal glory than the real prize of scientific discovery itself. The author makes his case through the lens of his own very personal journey into science, culminating in his team's search for telltale clues in the polarized light from the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, ancient messages from the very beginning of the universe that might finally reveal what put the bang into the Big Bang. In Keating's telling, the supposed smoking gun of what likely could have been a prize-worthy discovery was ultimately confounded by astronomer's ultimate cosmic nemesis, space dust --- leaving Keating and his collaborators short of achieving the desired prize and wondering what went wrong. Keating's story reveals how he made his peace with this outcome, in part, by taking a step back to critically examine the underpinnings of Nobel Prize itself, albeit in a constructive way that will still likely offend many of his colleagues. Keating does not claim that previous Nobel winners were necessarily unworthy, but makes an argument that, to better serve the spirit of its best intended "noble" purposes, the prize is in need of serious overhaul. His recommendations include the awarding of posthumous prizes, increased recognition of women and underrepresented scientists, and a new way to award the prize to more than the current limit of 3 people, especially since some of the most promising modern scientific discoveries are only possible through the efforts of huge international collaborations of thousands of scientists, not just singles, pairs, or triplets of rare geniuses. Overall, this is a lucid, provocative, occasionally hilarious, and thoughtfully honest account of the human side behind what the modern scientific journey is all about from one of its leading practitioners, and I highly recommend it. - Dr. Andrew Friedman, UC San Diego Center for Astrophysics & Space Sciences

[Kee Onn · Rating 5 out of 5]

Science happens when people are doing it. And even the very best people make mistakes, through ignorance, pride and greed. In this autobiography Brian talks at length of confirmation bias and how it has affected renowned scientists from Galileo to Einstein, and finally on his own project. An insider account follows on the project, from its ideation during his postdoc days at Caltech to the momentous press conference in which he was curiously absent. As he recounted, it turned out to be a moment of weakness, buoyed by the Nobel Prize and the urgency of publication, that led to their premature announcement of what turns out to be a false result. One of the most publicized scientific retraction ensued, and Brian took the chance to reflect and recast his priorities in research and in life.

Unlike most failed experiments, the fact that Brian chose to talk about his experience should not be taken for granted by the community. He and the editors did a great job in the narration - the image of the golden cow of Nobel is seared into the reader's mind. This book is a page-turner from the start, and the epilogue brings the story to a superb conclusion. The section in the book criticizing the Nobel Prize seemed like a case of the fox calling the grapes sour, but nevertheless is food for thought for current and aspiring scientists.

[Mishehu · Rating 4 out of 5]

In a 282 page book, it’s not till pg. 274 that the author finally says (I’m paraphrasing): science is its own reward. The author goes to speculate that some (readers, colleagues, whoever) may find him a bit of a whiner (again, paraphrasing). Well, I count myself among them.

4 stars for some very interesting science exposition, and for the author’s valid-seeming concerns about the Nobel, and suggestions for reforming it. But a 1-star dock for the unseemliness of the author’s constantly reminders a) of how intensely focused he was on winning a Nobel prize for much of his educational and professional life; b) that, rebel critic that he is, he’ll never get a Nobel now, and probably won’t be asked to serve ever again as a nominator for the prize; and c) that he really does deserve the prize.

I don’t doubt the author is a Nobel-caliber scientist. But there are lots of equally deserving physicists/cosmologists who haven’t gotten Nobels either and likely never will. Sometimes one simply doesn’t win, dessert notwithstanding. I found this thread tiresome.

Everything else I found well-written, informative, and enjoyable.

[Allegra · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is just a terrific book: a combination of science, memoir and polemic about why the Nobel Prize in Physics doesn't best serve the cause of science. Keating was the designer of an experiment that, if it had been proven correct, would have been a shoo-in for the Nobel: but after an announcement of Nobel-worthy results they had to be retracted. Thus, "losing." But there's more to the loss than that - and the experience caused him to reevaluate the Nobel and its mission.
But best of all, for me, was the cosmology. I have never been able to understand cosmological theory, though I am fascinated by it and have read many books, from Brian Greene to Neil deGrasse Tyson. None of them explain the Big Bang and the formation of the universe better than Brian Keating does. Reading this book made me feel smart! Keating is brilliant at explaining difficult concepts. I don't know if "Cosmology for Dummies" exists yet, but Keating is the man to write it, and if it does exist, I cannot believe it's better than what he writes in this book.

[Maria Anna van Driel · Rating 5 out of 5]

Reading "Losing the Nobel Prize" the world starts to blaze into the background as dr. Brian Keating slowly draws the reader into his life story with a laughter and a tear. Describing the earliest moments in where the universe aroused the curiosity of a 13 year young boy, the emotional moments while his father was fighting cancer, up until discussing the doubts if he and his team truly held the biggest scientific discovery in their hands, let both ones mind and emotions wonder the fabrics of time and space while waking up the inner scientist in each one.

-The Next Truth Magazine

[Brian · Rating 3 out of 5]

I was surprised to learn how much attempts to win the Noble Prize in Physics motivates research in the field of Cosmology. I find that disturbing and more than a little sad, if it is indeed true. I think Keating is a good writer and while I would probably need to re-read this book to get a better grasp of Cosmology, I still learned a lot from reading this book. His chapters on the field of Cosmology were fascinating and much more interesting than the three chapters he wrote on the Noble Prize award process and how he would modify it.

[Rae · Rating 5 out of 5]

Part adventure story, part cautionary tale, Brian Keating’s Losing the Nobel Prize is that rare thing among popular science books – a page-turner. It gives the reader an insider’s view of the highly competitive, not to say cut-throat, atmosphere in which modern science is done. Here is a thoughtful, honest look at how the lure of Nobel gold has impacted physicists (Keating included) and physics itself. It will leave you thinking!

Rae Armantrout

[Lucio Piccirillo · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a highly original and engaging book about the work of experimental cosmologists. The author explains very clearly the science and technology involved in the field. In addition, and this is the novelty, he adds his personal reflections about the Nobel prize and its impact in the work of scientists. This is truly a remarkable book and is a must read!

[Andy Lee · Rating 5 out of 5]

The author is able to make reading about scientist a lot more interesting and palatable than others I've come across in the past. The writing comes across with lots of passion and hope for the future.

[Patrick · Rating 5 out of 5]

A page-turning read that opens up the humanity behind contemporary cosmology, the history of looking to the stars, and the flaws of the Nobel Prize. Highly recommended!

[Sarah Olson Michel · Rating 4 out of 5]

If you're looking for a fascinating new perspective on the Nobel Prize and its shortcomings, a thrilling narrative of one cosmologist's quest for the gold and pursuit of scientific truth, then look no further. Dr. Brian Keating provides an exciting, in-depth look at "science's highest honor" - but more importantly, how it could be changed for the better. Gender inequity and toxic competition are two of the prize's downsides that Dr. Keating examines. This book is an excellent inside look at the field of physics today.

[Lance · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a great book with lots of valuable insight!

[Briley Lewis · Rating 5 out of 5]

This was a wonderful book, a vivid, personable, and accessible description of the scientific process, and a thought-provoking critique of the Nobel. I really appreciate the author's explanations of scientific concepts (one of the reasons I read it was to improve my own writing about astronomy for the public!) and the multiple story threads that are woven together into a portrait of not only the author and his quest for the prize, but also of modern astronomy and the scientific landscape.

Really, I was feeling the emotion by the end of it, which means this is more than just any old nonfiction book of facts. Great book!

[Nick · Rating 5 out of 5]

Professor Keating's in depth expose of the Noble Prize is a fascinating tale of what it's like to be part of a process that very few get to experience. Mr. Keating weaves a prolific story that keeps you engaged to the very end.

In Losing the Noble Prize, professor Keating drops the pants on Noble and we learn that Noble isn't very noble at all. I invite you to take a one of a kind literally journey by joining professor Keating as he tells you like it the ups and the down, in this all that glitters isn't gold in the land of Noble.

[Melissa Miller · Rating 5 out of 5]

A great piece of science writing. Dr. Keating explains his field of experimental cosmology well, and makes a strong case that the academic rat race is hurting science.

[Brian Miears · Rating 5 out of 5]

Like getting a peek backstage at this great show we call science! This book will give you massive respect for those who devote their lives to such rigor. And maybe a more discerning eye for the headlines as well.