To the outside world mention of Rwanda conjures up two associations: the terrible genocide of 1994 and, thanks to Hollywood, mountain gorillas, and the portrayal of conservationist, Dian Fossey by Sigourney Weaver. In a part of north London, supporters of Premier league football club Arsenal FC will also be aware of the sponsorship of the club by the Rwandan government using the slogan “visit Rwanda”.
Scholastique Mukasonga’s (first) novel about her native Rwanda is set in the 1970’s and predates the infamous genocide. Hers is a book rooted in personal tragedy after she lost thirty seven members of her family to the killings. Our Lady of the Nile is ostensibly a story of schooldays and adolescents learning to assert their personalities among their peer groups, and in youthful challenges to school authorities. In reality school shenanigans are secondary to a much deeper and far ranging examination of the cultural pressures within Rwanda and the clash of different ideologies. Like many commentators, academics and international agencies Mukasonga gives her perspective on the underlying causes of the internecine fighting that decimated the country.
The rivalry and bloodshed between different ethnic group, within a country, is clearly not unique. In the African continent, the Ndebele minority and Shona majority in Zimbabwe had a rivalry that stretched back over one hundred years, a division that was evident at the time of Independence; in Nigeria conflict between the Igbo and Hause led to the Biafran war. In Rwanda the hostility between the Tutsi and the Hutus is the most extreme example of genocide. Colonial governance (initially the Germans, and then the Belgians from 1919) undoubtedly created conditions in which the bitterness and resentment spiralled out of control. Scholastique Mukasonga subtlely picks out key moments when the native population was directly manipulated and the conditions were put in place for the horribly combustible outcome that reached its nadir in the 1990’s.
This book is a compelling recent history lesson about a country whose written histories are of suspect accuracy, written at a time (early c. 21st), when to speak too openly carries ongoing risks.
A variety of (sometimes competing) explanations from academics and historians trying to explain the causes of the Rwandan genocide
• The (minority) Tutsi and the Hutu were two ethnically identifiable, different, groups whose inability to co-exist, led to the killings
• The Tutsi were a ‘ruling’ class, and the Hutu were a ‘lower’ class.
• The Tutsi were specifically targeted by the Hutu in retaliation for the death (assassination?) of the Hutu President
• The Tutsi and the Hutu were ‘created’ as separate identifiable ethnic groups by the occupying colonialists for the insidious purpose of controlling the country more effectively.
• The Belgians, ahead of Independence, switched their patronage and discrimination away from the Tutsi, to the Hutu. From 1923 under a league of Nations mandate, the Belgians had commenced removing powers from the king (Musinga); the royal family was seen as a brake on the development of the country under colonial rule.
Some, all, or none of the above general summaries may be correct (I am very conscious to write this several thousand miles away, and having never visited Rwanda).
The historical angles coming out of Our Lady of The Nile
1. Pre colonisation, Monarchy .
Rwanda existed well before the arrival of Europeans. Scholastique Mukasonga introduces key characters Kagabo the healer and Rubanga the witch doctor (umwiru). The native Kinyawanda language is also referenced. Linkage to a time of monarchs, a royalty, strong queens, are essential to understanding Rwanda. A time before the Tutsi/Hutu delineations.
• Virginia Mutamuriza says that she has been sent by a queen from long ago. She has seen the Queens Umuzimu (ghost). Rubanga talks about the Queens burial, the Umuzimu, the Secret of Karinga; the Drum of the kings
• The death of Veronica Tumurinde is compared to Queen Kanjogera, Queen mother 1895-1931; a strong and influential woman. Women were in positions of great influence historically, and the Catholic Lycee, Our Lady of the Nile, did not come close to producing the strong women of the past.
2. Racial stereotyping 1.
In Monsieur de Fontanaille Scholastique Mukasonga creates a character, a Belgian coffee planter, whose construction of ethnic separateness is ultimately a justification for, and defence of, white supremacism. Veronica is his Isis/Cleopatra. Egypt temples have been built in his compound. Fontanaille is a defender and advocate of the “Tutsi”. Tutsis ‘are not negros’, a stance he talks about in terms of migration from the north of Africa, and promotes his outright racial ignorance that the paler skins indicated some sort of supremacy. The labelling of this group as Tutsi takes in a variety of other (now fully discredited) theories that include the movement south of the (white) copts and the (white) Romans.
The southern migration is aligned with the Kingdom of Kush (from c. 40 BC to c. 10 BC). Fontanaille asserts that Virginia is his Queen Candace, and that she originated in Meroe the capital (78)
The statue that sits at the source of the Nile was a monument built in 1953. This looks back to the late c.19th and the racial theories promulgated by John Hanning Speke
3. Racial stereotyping 2.
The creepy Father Hermenegilde, based at the Catholic school refers to 1957 Bahutu manifesto “which he helped to craft” (it was actually drafted by nine Rwandan intellectuals and was a political document that called for Hutu ethnic and political solidarity, as well as the political disfranchisement of the Tutsi people).
The rewriting of history is furthered by Father Pintard who asserts that ‘its all in the bible about the Tutsis’.
“the Belgians and the bishops believed in the Hutus, and only the Hutus”. In this view of history, the migratory peoples heading south were Falashas, a derogatory term for “wandering Jews”. Hermenegilde and Pintard throw in racial sources that includes Noah; Moses and the Queen of Sheba. The hametic theory. This is the group that then supposedly became the governing class- or Tutsis. In the first chapter the Hamite origin/migration theories are snidely mocked by Gloriosa when she sees Veronica trace the Nile north into the sea at Egypt- Gloriosa says she must be checking where her (Tutsi)ancestors came from
4. Tutsi and Hutu
The blurring of the lines between the two categorisations is a key, recurring, theme in Our Lady of the Nile.
• Gloriosa, a “Hutu”, is described as “she of the hoe” and she talks proudly of “the people of the hoe” getting rid of 900 years of the Hametic past. Scholastique Mukasonga doesn’t let the reader assume that physical work and the Tutsi/Hutu labels can be applied for an easy explanation. “Tutsi” Virginia on her school vacation is expressly wielding her own hoe. (137)
• Goretti, is a “Ruhengeri” girl from a military family. The regions and geography are important dividing lines. She and Gloriosa are both “Hutu”. They fall out significantly and are on opposing sides. At the finale Goretti is described as “the real Hutu”. This is not based on a murderous attitude towards “Tutsis”.
• Modesta is a ‘mixture’ of Hutu and Tutsi. Her father had tried to de-Tutsify himself through his marriages (93), This was not unusual occurrence known as “kwitutura”. Basic social mobility, both upwards and downwards.
5. Post genocide, contemporary Rwanda . It’s not just Arsenal football club who are connected to Rwanda (the President of Rwanda is a regular tweeter offering opinions on the manager and the team- he feels entitled to do so as a consequence of the Rwandan government’s investment in a team of millionaires).
A brief section in the book focuses on Dian Fossey (under the name Madame de Decker). “a white woman who lives in the colony, and controls access”. Goretti is angered by the assumption that (1) the whites invented the gorillas (2) creation myths of descent from the gorillas. Is this all that Rwanda means to foreigners?
In summary this is a complicated book which reads very differently after a revisit, and some basic online research into Rwanda. It is absolutely fascinating and thought provoking. So many questions remain unanswered in my mind.
I had one seemingly simple question that I couldn’t fathom, and that’s the story of Gakere, the bookkeeper who absconded with the cash to pay the monthly wages; he didn’t make it across borders into Barundi. Who is he, what does he signify? He’s not described as “Tutsi” or “Hutu”. I’d be very interested to know