While I of course did not in any way expect to agree with EVERY piece of writing chief editor and compiler Peter Boxall has considered worthy of inclusion in his 2006 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die (and although MANY of my personal favourites are actually and happily present) I do have three main and very personally uncomfortable issues with this tome, with 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die (and which actually grate enough for me to now only consider a high one star rating at best, that 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die is a decent enough compilation and certainly useful for reference purposes to an extent, but only to be recommended with very major and problematic caveats and reservations).
For one, and for me personally very much annoyingly, I definitely do consider the title 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die rather annoyingly and inappropriately misleading (and Boxall's rather dictatorial and a bit holier than thou tone more than a trifle off-putting as well) because ALL of the literary works listed (included) in 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die are novels or novellas. Now is this to mean that Peter Boxall somehow does not consider dramatic works or poetry collections as being legitimate, bona fide books? I mean, sorry, but Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's Faust, William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet and Charles Baudelaire's Les Fleurs du Mal are if published in print format in every way as much a book as Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, Theodor Fontane's Effi Briest and Thomas Mann's family epic Buddenbrooks. And thus, why this tome has NOT been titled something more akin to 1001 Works of Prose You Must Read Before You Die I really do not even remotely understand (for frankly, when I ordered my copy of the book, I originally and wrongly assumed that both poetry and drama would also be included, the lack of which does rather majorly frustrate, as the title, as 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die is in my opinion rather a major falsehood, as it absolutely does NOT make it clear that ALL of the included literature offerings are examples of prose, are only novels, longer short stories and novellas).
Furthermore, and for two, while 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die claims to be international in scope, there is (at least in my opinion) most definitely a decidedly American and United Kingdom bias being shown by Boxall. And while with especially most of the United Kingdom, with the England based novels I actually and in fact also heartily agree with them being included as books to must read, I do think that especially earlier French and Spanish works of prose seem to have come more than a bit short (although I must admit that I am in fact pleasantly surprised at how many German language novels/novellas are featured, but be that as it may, I still strongly think that 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die could be and really should be considerably more universal and international, for as it stands now, it really does seem as though Peter Boxall thinks that American and United Kingdom authors are by their very nature somehow superior literature and culture wise, and even if this might never have been his intention, this feeling in my opinion and certainly does permeate and remain throughout 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die).
And finally, and I guess what actually has moved 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die from a low two star to a high two one star ranking for me is the massively infuriating fact of the matter that aside from Margaret Atwood, Carol Shields, and Yann Martel (whose Life of Pi I personally in fact and indeed cannot stand, and I also have to wonder if Boxall even considers Martel Canadian since he was born in Spain), Canadian literature has been pretty well totally ignored in 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die. Also, why does Peter Boxall need to include SEVEN Margaret Atwood novels? Yes, she is a supremely talented Canadian author, but there are in fact so many other Canadian authors equally as talented. Where is Margaret Laurence? Where is Timothy Findley? Where is W.O. Mitchell? Where is Hugh McLennon? Where is Alice Munro? Where are the many excellent Quebecois Francophone authors? And I could go on and on here, as Canada has a rich and varied literary tradition and that Boxall obviously rather believes that only Margaret Atwood (and to a lesser extend Carol Shields and perhaps Yann Martel) are worthy of inclusion in his 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die, that they supposedly somehow "represent" all of Canadian Literature, well, I do hugely find this naively blinkered to the extreme (and actually rather ill read to be blunt) as well as totally, utterly insulting. And while I do in fact occasionally browse through my copy of 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die, I actually and generally ONLY tend to make use of the book to check information (and plot summaries) of books with which I am already familiar (that I have already read) and not so much for finding new reading material, as I just do not in any way consider 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die an acceptable book resource (as there is just too much missing and too much of a USA and United Kingdom bias for me).