We read this book as a class in 8th grade and I remember hating it. I don't think I read it on my own, so either it was read during class, or I started to read it and gave up.
I've been completing a "pre-baby reading challenge" and needed to read a book from my childhood, and a book I read in school. This covers both of those categories. I also wanted to revisit it to see why I hated it so much and to see if I could figure out why a teacher would include it in their lesson plans.
After a second reading I can honestly say that I really hate this book.
To begin with, I don't typically enjoy nature, adventure stories. More than anything this is the story about a little boy who finds a way to survive in the wilderness, and that's simply not my cup of tea.
The other main factor that contributes to my dislike is the hard reality the wildlife animals in the story portray. I love animals, and while I understand life in the wild is very dangerous, I don't enjoy reading about it. Most of the animals characters in the story die, usually in very painful and distressful ways. It's not a fun read.
So why would a teacher have a class read this book? Why do (did) librarians recommend it? And why did it win Newbery Honor Book and ALA Notable Children's Book awards?
I think one because of the author. Allan W. Eckert is a highly esteemed natural historian and writer who was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize several times. He also lives in Ohio and was involved in several well-known productions such as Tecumseh, which having grown up in Ohio, I remember being very popular. So I can see how his influence and locality would impact local teachers and librarians in their choices.
I was also interested with his depiction of the main character, Ben. Ben is a six year old boy who doesn't fit in with his peers or family. He is small, quiet, and withdrawn. He has trouble communicating and relates more to animals than to fellow humans. Today, I am almost positive he would be identified on the Autism spectrum, but this book was written in 1971 when such a thing didn't exist, and neither did stories with Autistic protagonists. Certainly all children can relate to feeling small and sometimes unimportant. We have all experienced what it feels like when people don't listen to us, or discount us, and in this way Ben is relatable to all. But he is more than that, he is truly separate, and my guess is that not many stories in the 70's depicted children this way.
While lost in the wilderness, Ben befriends and becomes adopted by a female badger who essentially keeps him alive for two months. The climax is when both Ben and badger take on a local dog, Lobo. Lobo is described as scary and unpredictable, and belongs to the story's antagonist, so when the badger succeeds in viciously killing him, we're supposed to rejoice, or at least be relieved. I was horrified. Again, I understand that wildlife must kill or be killed, but I don't enjoy reading about it. And as a reader I never felt threatened by Lobo, even though Ben does, so I was not happy about his death.
Once Ben is reunited with his family, things change for him socially. He finds he is able to communicate more openly because he believes he has things to say. His family realizes he has always been intelligent, and not so different from them as they once believed. He is still different though. He also has a feral badger as a pet. The family accepts that he does not fit the mold, but can succeed. That's a message I can see educators wanting to share.
And through the lives of the animals, as I've mentioned, the book explores mortality and children's understanding of death. At the end of the story, badger is shot and most likely going to die. Ben asks his father if she will live:
"Ben's lower lip trembled but he said nothing and MacDonald squeezed his shoulder, wishing there were words he could say to make it easier, wishing there was some way to put across to a little six-year-old that life is such a fragile thing and that, painful though it may be, death is a part of life...It came as a shock to MacDonald to realize that Ben did understand..."
It doesn't make for a fun read, but it's a good and true message for children and adults, and most certainly a reason why the book is so popular. I appreciate it, but don't feel glad to have read 13 chapters about painful animal death to reach it.
I also felt the vocabulary used throughout the story would certainly make it a pick for teachers.
So overall, while I appreciate the messages and the writing, I really dislike the story and will find other ways to explore the concepts with my own kids.