Darkspell is the second in a multiple-book series, and, much like the book itself does, this review will presume some knowledge of the series' first book, Daggerspell. I'll do my best to skirt around spoilers for Darkspell itself.
Darkspell continues the interlacing episodes of Daggerspell between the centuries-distant past and the "present" of the story in Deverry of the 11th century. The past segments are set in the 8th century this time around.
I'll get the gripes about this particular book in the series out of the way first. A lot of the 11th century sections did nothing for me. It's hard to say if it's just a current frame of mind, or one that will last quite a bit longer, but I don't have a lot of patience for scenes of youthful badasses at battle, or a story's major conflict being between Good and Evil, or the major goal being possession of a magical doodad. The 11th-century sections have all of these elements, such that I was bored through much of the last half of Darkspell.
The presentation of the evil characters, the wielders of dark dweomer, was especially over-the-top. It isn't enough that they wield dark magic--they also drink blood, create zombies, and are major players in the opium trade in Deverry. One of the two central characters on the evil side is a pederast. The two psychically and physically rape a captive to add power to their magic. Whose side are we expected to be on, here, and which side will win the mystical battle at the end? I wonder. While I'm normally happy to see LGBT characters in a novel, their only representative being also representative of capital-E Evil in this book wasn't great, to say the least. It was written in the '80s, but still... but still.
Moving on. In Darkspell's case, and of the book I read previous to this one, it was important to me that the book have a good ending, that the author stick the landing after long patches of flagging interest. I'm happy to say that Darkspell delivered wonderfully. One of the "evil" characters meets the end he has coming, and that end fits both the setting's value of honor, and a motif or theme that is hugely important to the series as a whole.
The 8th century sections were far better for me, overall. At one point, perhaps inspired by my reading of Deverry: Three Tales, I thought to myself that this part of the novel would work just fine on its own, and immediately changed my mind: without the previous tragedies in Daggerspell, and without the ongoing improving hopes of the characters' wyrds in the main body of these novels, this section wouldn't be anywhere near as powerful.
Cullyn's previous incarnation, Dannyn, was my favorite character in this section. He's my favorite in the 11th century, and you don't see much of him in the "present," and that could have something to do with Dannyn's appeal for me, but there's also his loyalty to his brother. It's a redemptive streak that prevails even when he is driven to do something unforgivable. (That act is also a point of similarity or resonance with an evil character mentioned previously, in kind if not in degree.) Mael, a new character introduced during this sequence, was another favorite, with a quiet arc and nice ending of his own. Rhodry and Jill go through a cycle here, too, of course, and I'll leave you to discover how that plays out.
It takes a lot, and I mean a lot, for me to say I love a series, for my internal critic to sit down and shut up for a minute and let me just enjoy something without its interference. Daggerspell completely broke down these defenses, and while Darkspell didn't have quite the same impact, whether due to its being a second book or to the failings I perceive in it, Deverry's marvelous braid of present and past; of background detail, character and theme; of tragedy and hope, takes me as close as I'll ever get to declaring love. Occasional prickly disagreement and all.