Yes, the other David Mitchell. But to me he is “the one” and the other one is the other one. The cutie pie from QI et al.
He is so much fun in a verbal spar with other comedians, but in the Introduction to this volume….not so much, I’m sorry to say. The Introduction makes some excessively loquacious remarks about dishonesty that’s funny in spots. Skim it or skip it but don’t stop there! (Hey, doesn’t the word “skip” in the queen’s language mean “trash can?”)
But the essays and newspaper columns throughout? They show keen and well-thought-out observations and well-written criticism of today’s weirdness, and I am more edified having read them. Overall, I was impressed by how well he summarized complex ideas so economically and perfectly. Being blunt and forthright myself, I appreciate his forthright stance.
Looking back at all of my highlights and bookmarks, these are SOME of the concepts he explores the truthfulness of that particularly spoke to me:
Opinions, capitalism, global warming, identity theft, anonymity, actors anonymity, truth in advertising, photography, English chocolate bars, music, fine art, business conglomerates, news, paleontology monopoly, healthcare, style, and an incredibly popular British documentary about Bros, an ‘80s band I had never heard of but will have to see, I guess.
I’m sorry to say there were sections I skimmed or skipped. Since dishonesty is almost as good as honesty, I should admit that I don’t follow English politics as assiduously as he follows US politics, which makes sense in a way since politics is all about dishonesty, isn’t it? But if I’m allowed to be honest, I should admit that the only English politics I’ve seen this year is a video of the prime minister coughing and sneezing while magnetic letters kept disappearing in the background. Maybe if the English politicians did TikTok spots, average dumb ass Americans like me could follow along?