I was content to just rate the book. But y’all asked. So,
You can come at the issues of this book by considering the pictures of sabbath/rest/unhurriedness Comer offers and imagining who could attain these. There’s the initial one of living in the city and being able to walk his dog to work (idk how anyone with a dog is unhurried but I’ll leave that). There’s taking a month vacation in the summer with a stack of books while his kids play in front of him (any parent knows that this is either helplessly out of touch or John Mark is being conveniently silent on where Mrs. Comer is in this scenario so that he can relax in the easy chair). There’s cooking long, slow meals at home (I, never mind). One could, and Comer does, go on.
Surely if sabbath is a real thing, it is available to everyone. Right? And yet, what of those pictures could a single moms with two (maybe three) jobs know? Can parents of young children experience this kind of sabbath when the definition of “small children” in the original Latin is “being hurried as you’ve never hurried before”? What about the pastors back at the other campus Comer left to go to the downtown, walkable one precisely because he couldn’t be at rest back there? Stinks to be them! What of the Apostle Paul? It’s hard to imagine his life fitting into this framework. Can we say his life was not hurried or busy or full to the brim? Can we really imagine he wasn’t absolutely exhausted in every way possible (actually, don’t imagine, just look up the Greek of “spent” in 2 Corinthians 12:15; he tells us he was)? If he was, must we assume he wasn’t rested? It would seem so according to Comer’s understanding.
My first issue is that idea of sabbath Comer presents is attainable by an incredibly small and specific demographic and seemingly no more. And that sentence includes my ultimate problem with the book and why it can’t get more than one star. Comer’s idea of sabbath is just that, an *idea* to be realized, a *thing* to attain, an *experience* to have.
It’s not that I think this book is weak theologically or silly practically. Although I think it is both at parts. It’s that I believe this book is dangerous. The people I know who have taken its word the most to heart, are the least restful, stretched thin people I know. Genuinely. They have set boundaries and blocked out time for sabbath, but they aren’t rested. In fact they are much less so than people I know who don’t have either of those things! They are either burnt out or seem to camp on the precipice of it. And I believe it is a direct result of this book. Why?
Because what Comer offers in this book is a carrot stick that can never be caught. As it is presented here, sabbath is a vibe, an ethereal idea, a millennial aesthetic. It’s a house that is always on the next hill over but is never arrived at. Sabbath/rest is something to, funnily enough, pursue, chase down, catch. (That’s why you must *ruthlessly* eliminate hurry. The title itself, too clever by half, tells you it doesn’t offer what it claims to.) Sabbath for Comer, and his disciples, is something over there out our grasp and must be strived for. And this understanding of sabbath is toxic.
Because, if that’s what it truly is, we must strive for sabbath. And this striving only produces discontentment because whatever that picture of sabbath is in our heads, it necessarily includes little stress, little physical tax, and no exhaustion in any sphere whatsoever. Good vibes only, please. However else you may want to nuance it, if you ask yourself “how do I have what he’s having?”, the answer is necessarily that sabbath is something we must strive for. It’s an idea (read, “fantasy”) to be actualized. You don’t have it, it’s somewheres out there though, and if you just keep on searching, one day it’ll be yours. One day. And until it does, until your living situation allows for it, sabbath is impossible.
But the rub is that Christians know, or ought to anyway, that true Sabbath is none of these *things.* Sabbath is not something to achieve or gain or finally arrive at. Sabbath is not a vibe or an experience. It isn’t healthy work-life balance. It isn’t even a feeling at all.
Sabbath is not an ideal to attain. Sabbath is a Person to know. The Lord of the Sabbath himself and knowing him is sabbath–not “sabbath” itself. Period. And because that’s the case, “sabbath” is available to any and all regardless. Absolutely counter to Comer’s presentation, Sabbath has chased us down. He’s available whatever our commute to work or gaggle of children is like. He and his rest is available to you whether you are hurried or in total zen. He and his rest are there when the kids are a mess and when they finally move out. He and his rest can be had in utter depletion like Paul or, yes, JM, while sitting with a stack of books. Because sabbath isn’t a thing, He’s a person. You need not do anything but sit with him.