I want to begin by saying that this is such an important subject matter, and it’s very clear that a tonne of research went into this. The fact that only 52% of this book is actual content with the rest being endnotes/bibliography/index, as well as each chapter having an average of 140 endnotes is a strong indication of that. James Daschuk is clearly a very knowledgeable and highly intelligent person. My issue with this book was that it did not come across as a book at all, rather as a doctoral thesis that had been published under the auspice of being a book (which, it turns out, is more or less what it is). Making this clearer, perhaps even describing it as such on the back cover of the book, would have created reasonable expectations for this book (although also probably would have decreased sales…). There was also a heavy reliance on the reader having an extensive knowledge of Canadian history and events going into the book, with (sometimes obscure) people and events referenced with little-to-no explanation offered. Not to say that you have to dedicate a chapter to explaining these background components, but a paragraph would have been nice.
As it stands, this wasn’t something I “enjoyed” reading (understandable, given the heavy and depressing subject matter!), however the real issue is that I really didn’t retain much of it either. I have read a fair amount of Indigenous Canadian history of late, and although I just finished reading this one, very little of it has stuck with me. I must have missed the “arresting, but harrowing, prose” that the book is described as containing. It was so dry that I would read it before bed, and would only get through 3-4 pages on an e-reader (so not even full-length pages!) before my eyes grew heavy and it was time for sleep. It took me 15 hours over the course of 48 weeks to finish this book, and I lost count of how many times I took it out of the library, because I just couldn't motivate myself to read it any faster.
My favourite part was the conclusion (and not just because it meant I was done), as it was well-written, concise, and would have made for an excellent article on its own, likely one I would have even encouraged others to read. The book as a whole, however, was incredibly lengthy and repetitive. There were certain words that are not part of common parlance and yet were used heavily throughout the book; it almost felt as though the author had recently learned this word, and then felt the need to use it every few pages to remind us that he knew it. This is yet another book that would have benefitted significantly from a strong editor.
As a personal aside, this was one of those occasions I should have judged a book by its cover, or at least its title, as I was disappointed that this book only covered the impacts of disease and politics on the Prairies. This is no fault of the author (it’s quite literally in the title), but as someone from the East Coast, I was hoping to learn more about how these things impacted the Mi’kmaq and Maliseet too, instead of exclusively those on the Prairies. Again, having so narrow a focus serves a thesis quite well, but not necessarily the general public.
Clearly I am the outlier here, as it has a pretty high rating and lots of positive reviews. It just didn’t do it for me, but if you’re someone who is highly academic, or perhaps if you’re from the Prairies, you might get a lot more out of this than I did.