To the average reader without a disability, 'Diving Into Glass' may seem like a traditional memoir, where the author tells their story, encounters difficulties, and offers the reader a couple of lessons to take away with them at the end. Unfortunately, as a person with Cerebral Palsy, I can tell you that ‘Diving Into Glass’ isn’t a simple memoir. It is instead a quasi-biography dressed up as a memoir. Such distinctions are fundamentally important.
The author of ‘Diving Into Glass’, Caro Llewelyn is the new CEO of the Wheeler Centre, an accomplished author, and a respected curator of many artistic festivals. But the great majority of this book is about her father Richard Llewelyn, who was diagnosed with polio at age 20. The book is a chronicle of the challenges that he confronts during the course of his life from HER perspective.
When I was a child in Adelaide attending the special school and therapy centre known as Regency Park Centre (RPC), I was not only familiar with Richard’s work, but around the campus he was rightly revered as a pioneer in establishing RPC, and if it wasn’t for RPC my life would be very different. Given that Richard was the central to the RPC story, I admit that I could potentially have a bias.
Despite this, the book was marketed as Caro’s story about her diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and her attempts to understand it. However, that only occurred after her father had died in 2004, three quarters of the way through the book (Though it is described in the short preface, and fitfully described in illusory fragments without depth until then).
The narrative the reader sees instead is an assessment of trauma, and specifically of the trauma relating to having a father with a severe physical disability. For better or worse, the reader is invited to be sympathetic with Caro, and her circumstances, given that they were not of her own making. Although she speaks lovingly of her father at times, this book is about how his disability effected her.
It is enormously difficult to live with a severe physical disability on a daily basis. My parents and my brother experience different challenges as a result of my disability, I only know on a superficial level what their experiences are like. If they wrote a memoir about their time with me, it would be very different to the one I would write about myself. We have different perspectives, and different versions of the same stories, even if we are all a part of them. But at the end of the day, I would like to think that my family would write about my personality, my quirks, my strengths, and my weaknesses, as a complex human being. Some of these would be connected to my disability, but I hope the majority of these would not.
The overriding failure of ‘Diving into Glass’ is that we are only allowed to see Richard through one perspective. If it were Caro’s, an argument could be made that it is valid, but the actual perspective is more troubling. Everything concerning Richard is seen through the prism of his disability. Richard is not just the sum total of his disability, he is a man who has polio, who should be evaluated as a human being.
Caro’s failure is particularly noticeable during one disturbing passage that leaps off the page. In a fit of anger during her childhood, Caro explains that she wished to set fire to the family home with her father trapped inside. She reasoned that he could escape and that would somehow prove that he had been faking his disability. Perhaps a person without a disability could commend Caro’s honesty and candour, and by no means do I think or suggest that Caro was going to follow through on this immature and murderous impulse. However, the suggestion of this on the page is troubling enough for me. The mere thought of murdering a person with a disability who cannot defend himself, and describing it in the book gives the reader permission to think it is a rational response, particularly given the detached manner in which she recounts it.
Whilst some of the book examines Richard’s pioneering achievements, and emphasises his stubbornness and resourcefulness, a study of his character seems to be a secondary impulse. The constant demand of the reader is to empathise with Caro, her story, and the reasons why her father’s polio tore the family apart.
This is where Caro’s subjectivity overwhelms a far more compelling narrative. Richard had two unique and multifaceted marriages. They were not unique because he was disabled, they were unique because they were so different. Interabled marriages are rarely discussed with complexity and nuance, and unfortunately there’s no room for that in this book.
Richard’s first wife Kate was a nurse in the hospital where Richard stayed when he was first diagnosed with polio. They were both young and impetuous, in fact Caro describes how they were so good together in the initial stages of courtship, because without Kate, Richard would not have survived the first year after his diagnosis. Even this positive assessment is described through the lens of Richard’s disability.
I was particularly struck by a passage that describes a scene on their wedding day when Kate’s mother suggested to her that instead of marrying Richard, she would have preferred that Kate marry a dog. When read that passage, I grimaced. and cried out with pain. Later in the book as Caro describes the destruction of that marriage, she suggests that her grandmother may have been right, for it would have spared her mother the emotional turmoil that followed. What about Richard? How would he feel being compared to a dog, and then reading that his daughter hypothesising that perhaps the comparison could be correct?
Yes, Richard and Kate’s marriage ended in carnage, but despite the challenges of supporting Richard with his activities of daily living, even the most impartial observer can deduce that it was not the only reason their marriage failed. Caro does admit to her mother’s many faults, and emotional volatility, but she shows her mother far more sympathy than her father is ever given.
As that marriage was crumbling, Richard fell in love with his support worker who came in to provide physical and emotional support when Kate could not. Becky is American, she was young when she started helping Richard, and in many ways completely opposite to Kate. Caro was sent to live with her mother just as Richard’s second relationship, and subsequent marriage was solidifying, so we do not get a great deal of insight into Richard’s relationship with Becky. Instead, we are left with a few anecdotes about how Becky managed Richard’s daily living tasks, and how she encouraged parts of Richard’s personality that Caro did not connect with.
If you think my assessments of the book are harsh, that is because I’m echoing the tone of the book.
'Diving Into Glass’ is a microcosm of the biggest debate discussed within the disability sector. Why are the stories of people with disabilities themselves sidelined in favour of those who are their family and/or caregivers? Why is it that these perspectives are given more currency?
I would encourage people to read this book, but I feel it (and many others like it) should come with a warning, similar to the ones seen on cigarette packages.
“This story is not representative of the protagonist’s disability”
Having said this, what I really want to see is an objective, thoroughly researched biography of Richard Llewellyn. If Caro’s goal was to inform the reader of what a remarkable man her father was, she has achieved her objective in spite of herself. Her memoir does not respect people with disabilities, their struggles, and their right to be seen as fully realised, multifaceted, independent human beings that are not just the sum total of their own impairments.
I dream that somewhere, tucked away, Richard has a memoir. If by some miracle he does, would it even be published? Or sold in mainstream bookstores? At least it would be his story. It needs to be told properly and given the appropriate justice.