This book is a combination of seafaring history and philosophy. That is, each chapter devoted about 2/3 of its pages to a brief biography of a famed naval visionary, with the remaining pages devoted to the author’s philosophizing on what he felt were the primary personal attributes that made that person’s naval career so successful and distinguished.
The first ten chapters covered the following historical naval figures:
Themistocles
Zheng He
Sir Francis Drake
Vice Admiral Viscount Horatio Nelson
Rear Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan
Admiral Lord John Arbuthnot Fisher
Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz
Admiral Hyman Rickover
Admiral Elmo R. Zumwalt, Jr
Rear Admiral Grace Hopper
(For some reason, there was an eleventh chapter that covered two more admirals, but those two individuals were simply not as historically impactful as those covered in the previous ten chapters.)
All biographies were interesting, but they were all so short (maybe 20-25 pages) that it felt a bit like I was reading a Cliff’s Notes version of their lives.
The philosophical portions of this book are more problematic. So I decided to very quickly review the philosophical portion of each chapter looking for some of the attributes the author credited these historical figures with having. The attributes I found (I repeat, via a VERY quick review) were vision, decisiveness, organization, resilience, tolerance, courageousness, discipline, devotion, teamwork, intellectualism, professionalism, determination, strategic thinking, personableness, work ethic, vision, charisma, energy, patriotism, mentoring and loyalty. I need not have bothered to do that exercise, though, because the book’s final chapter (titled “Conclusion”) discussed the author’s selected list of attributes (creativity, resilience, humility, balance, honesty, empathy, sense of justice, decisiveness, determination and perspective). Indeed, the only reason I’m talking about the book’s philosophical aspects in this book review is to point out that the subject and its conclusions are certainly subjective and prone to incompleteness.
Bottom line: I was interested in learning more about impactful, historical naval figures. I was much less interested in the author’s musing on what might have made them tick. I felt that combining actual historical record with philosophical musing was an odd combination.