I felt like I was watching a man take out the engine of my car and replace it with a wooden contraption when I read The Ongoing Role of Apostles in Missions by Don Dent. As the chapters progressed, I was more and more sure that the car would not run. By the end of the book, after he had tightened up the final bolts and closed the hood, the car started up and worked. I was surprised, but I am concerned with how long that car will be able to run.
Here are some of the good things in this book:
Dent does good exegetical work in explaining the NT's use of the word 'apostle.'
In the closing chapter, Dent offers a number of conclusions and applications of his biblical work that were overwhelmingly good and a critique of the missionary model that makes the speed at which the work is done as the highest priority. He is concerned that few missionaries are willing to be “tent-makers” and are over dependent on outside funding to do their work (167), that sending churches micro-manage the missionaries they send (168), or that churches do not personally know their missionaries (171). He is concerned that some practitioners of the church planting movement see that Paul discipled people quickly and lean too far in the “quick” direction. (173) Dent believes that “We must protect evangelism, teaching, and church planting as the core of the mission task.” He wants to ensure that the church leans on God’s power, “We must deny, however, our tendency to turn missions into a technique or to seek the power of the Spirit more than seeking the Spirit of power.” (174)
Here is a point of concern:
Dent sees this “apostle missionary” as having authority from God and not from a local church. (77; see appendix 4) Dent does not believe that churches send out these kinds of missionaries, nor do they supervise them. (14) He sees these apostles as possessing “authority” to accomplish their task of establishing churches. According to Dent, the “apostles” are not accountable to local churches because they are called by God. One time he mentions a “senior apostle” who oversees his missionary team. (176) Dent’s understanding of the authority of an apostle applies what was unique about Paul’s authority to some missionaries today. This understanding opens the door for a missionary to be able to act as a kind of “bishop” to a number of churches, who is accountable to no one else. There are no clear boundaries on when a place comes out of the “apostle phase” and into the “established phase,” so an “apostle missionary” could hold that authority for an undefined period of time.
Dent builds a strange engine that still gets the car to a good place. He offers a critique to modern missionary movements that is needed. But for Dent to use the word “apostle” in a way that very few do makes it more difficult for him to enter the mission's conversation. I think because of how rigid he is with using that word, this book is not a good dialogue partner in the on-going conversation. But more significantly, I wonder how long the car will run with his suspicion of established local churches and the unchecked authority of “missionary apostles. That is a non-biblically prescribed position that is headed towards danger. Let’s hope he didn’t mess with the brakes.