First, a minor point of correction to the description of the book here on Goodreads: The primary writers that Boltanksi bases his analysis on are Arthur Conan Doyle and Georges Simenon.
How does one rate an academic text like this? It is something you read only because you really want to. I thought I might learn something about the nature of conspiracies, and I did, I think, but after the early sections analyzing detective fiction, it becomes an analysis on the conceptualization of sociology in general. I continued to read almost just to prove to myself I could follow what Boltanski was describing, long after I lost interest in the topic at hand. I sometimes did follow his reasoning, and made it all the way to the end, footnotes and all. Yay?
Onward to more frivolous reads!