Crowe covers the Fall of Abbott and Turnbull and the rise of Morrison. The split in the Liberal Party once relatively harmless wets and drys, in this period becomes thoroughly toxic, and based more on personalities who blazingly hated each other than on philosophy. Turnbull was a moderate, and there were many few moderates with him, but the hatred of the 3 As: Abbott Abetz and Andrews, backed up by Dutton and turncoats like Cormann, Cash and Fifield, and with Morrison and his band of Christian brothers, Alex Hawke, Robert, van Manen, Irons, Hastie who solidly support each other whatever, made a poisonous mixture. Party solidarity didn’t matter, the interests of the Australian people still less, knocking off your enemy over-rode everything else. These political murders of Bishop and Turnbull were in the face of popular support for them. Morrison is portrayed as a master politician who deserved to become PM as he united the party (so far). I was particularly interested in how Crowe portrayed the 2019 election campaign as I have written about that in Waves of Unreason (Ginninderra). Crowe sees it as masterly politicking by Morrison, even while noting that many of his claims were not true, but well that’s politics. I saw it as an outrage, where Morrison lied and lied without stint, having no policies for ordinary people, marketing the nature of the campaign as a personality contest between him and Shorten, which is not what a democratic election is about. We had one side offering decent policies (all right, maybe not well costed but it was aimed at ordinary people), the other side offering taxes for the rich and that was it. Morrison the marketeer sold the electors a pup, as we now are seeing. Morrison or not, the Liberals did not deserve to win after the shambles of the previous hate filled years. Crowe stops at the victory – soon after that Morrison fumbled the bushfires, the COVID vaccine rollout, he was corrupt in handouts to mates … I need not go on, but admittedly that happened after the victory where Crowe stopped but I would have looked to see how Crowe would have handled that. The book has been very well received and indeed it gives a very detailed factual account, which as a reporter is certainly professional of him. I fear I judge through moral lenses – and not Pentecostal or even Christian ones.