Archaeologists as antagonists
Q: What's the biggest cemetery of Native Americans in the United States?
A: The Smithsonian Museum
-from the book
It's not often the case that we think of archaeologists or museum curators as villains. They're usually, rightly, perceived as high-minded cultural custodians, scientists, or scrappy adventurers. However, as this book shows, once one thinks about it, their hoard of exotic materials came from somewhere else, somewhere foreign to themselves, and thus by definition, something they don't exactly have the natural right to possess or hold on to.
The topic deliberated in this book is the issue of repatriation, or return, of the skeletons, remains, religious items, funereal adornment, and other artifacts of ceremonial importance to Native Americans that museums throughout the decades have plucked and collected. For some reason, the bones and skeletal remains of Native Americans are deemed fit by anthropologists and museum staff for display in exhibits and storage in collections, when the bones of equally old and deceased members of other ethnicities are not similarly ransacked from graves, scientifically experimented on, or put up for ghastly displays alongside jungle dioramas and depictions of exotic life. Religious relics, such as worshipped statues, hats and masks that are active elements of contemporary Native American ceremonies, are sold off as commodities at auctions or interned in museum catalogues, further dispossessing a people who could only review their heritage by conceding to the 9-5 operating hours of the museum, like usual tourists.
Furthermore, even when laws like NAGPRA order museums to specifically return Native American remains and objects, archaeologists and museum staff drag their feet and pull off all kinds of shenanigans and excuses to prevent the piecemeal disintegration of their collections. They shuffle paperwork enough to delay repatriation for 18 years. They come up with all manner of insults, such as, 'the only good indians are dead indians', to mock the tribes who they perceive as coming to encroach their personal hoards of collections. Often enough, they continue to fence their collections and hope the matter stews over, but the clamor of the outside world, the masses of people who one would think are less progressive or cosmopolitan than anthropologists, swells like a wave crashing over them. For instance, the FBI provided first class seats for a Zuni representative and the statue he was recovering with him. The police sent paired escorts to a car driving the return of statues at every fork in the road, to offer protection and respect. Republican senator John McCain sponsored a bill to repatriate Native American remains and artifacts, as did a Montana senator named John Melcher. When museums sought to tamp down on return of objects, thousands of concerned, ordinary Americans wrote an outpouring of letters to protest on behalf of Native American rights and ensured public fallout for any chicanery. It's strange to think of archaeologists and anthropologists as falling behind the FBI in acts of decency, but there it was.
Ultimately, the museums know that stocking up on claimed Native American remains is pragmatically a losers' game to play, though surprisingly, a lot of them aren't moved simply by the ethical deliberations alone. However, a lot of them fear the precedent it sets, that their collections could become exhausted and disbanded by all the people, previously colonized and stripped of their curios, coming forward to reclaim their cultural remains. Thus, repatriation goes straight to the heart of interrogating the raison d'etre of the museum and the museum industry as a whole. Why do we collect things in venerable institutions? Should we honor those who seek to preserve, or give way to those who partake in that heritage and seek to use it in a way that lets things decay? Should scholarship and public edification trump the religious and cultural assertions of locals to take back their ancestors, and the things they made? This book is a thought-provoking, nuanced, and balanced book, in fact the most provocative thing about is the title. It's an informative book rather than an opinion book.