What do you think?
Rate this book
Summary of Capital in the Twenty-First Century: by Thomas Piketty | Includes Analysis
Summary of Capital in the Twenty-First Century by Thomas Piketty - Includes Analysis
Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century is a study of inequity, both historically and in the present. The book describes how the concentration of wealth has changed over time. Its central thesis is that return on capital is greater than growth over time, which means that capital and inequality inevitably increase. The book also considers the ways governments might address the increasing concentration of wealth in the future.
Many economists have argued that increasing worker productivity in the modern era will inevitably result in reduced inequality. The historical record suggests that this is untrue. For most of history, there has been a huge gap between the rich and poor with no real middle class.
That changed in developed countries during the twentieth century for a number of reasons. First, two world wars caused massive shocks to the status quo and resulted in severe losses to many holders of capital...
PLEASE This is key takeaways and analysis of the book and NOT the original book.
Inside this Instaread Summary of Capital in the Twenty-First
Overview of the Book Important People Key Takeaways Analysis of Key Takeaways
About the Author
With Instaread, you can get the key takeaways, summary and analysis of a book in 15 minutes. We read every chapter, identify the key takeaways and analyze them for your convenience.
Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century is a study of inequity, both historically and in the present. The book describes how the concentration of wealth has changed over time. Its central thesis is that return on capital is greater than growth over time, which means that capital and inequality inevitably increase. The book also considers the ways governments might address the increasing concentration of wealth in the future.
Many economists have argued that increasing worker productivity in the modern era will inevitably result in reduced inequality. The historical record suggests that this is untrue. For most of history, there has been a huge gap between the rich and poor with no real middle class.
That changed in developed countries during the twentieth century for a number of reasons. First, two world wars caused massive shocks to the status quo and resulted in severe losses to many holders of capital...
PLEASE This is key takeaways and analysis of the book and NOT the original book.
Inside this Instaread Summary of Capital in the Twenty-First
Overview of the Book Important People Key Takeaways Analysis of Key Takeaways
About the Author
With Instaread, you can get the key takeaways, summary and analysis of a book in 15 minutes. We read every chapter, identify the key takeaways and analyze them for your convenience.
36 pages, Kindle Edition
Published March 1, 2019
53 people are currently reading
47 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews
June 3, 2025
This is a nice summary of Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2013) by Thomas Piketty. This summary, along with the Wikipedia article for the book, at least provide the gist, for those who might find Piketty's 696 page doorstopper a bit daunting. There's also a documentary film adapted from the book (the Variety magazine review is here), for even lazier information consumption.
This summary centers around eight "key takeaways", which I excerpt from the summary:
1. Discussions of inequality are innately political. [...]
2. The capital/income ratio is an important indicator of inequality in a society.
3. When growth is low, the capital/income ratio is high, and societies tend to become more unequal.
4. There is no guarantee that inequality will lessen in the modern era. [...]
5. The vast majority of wealth in the twenty-first century is private wealth. [...]
6. Despite increased life expectancy, inheritance continues to be of major importance in perpetuating wealth.
7. Inequality in the twenty-first century is different from that of earlier eras in that it is partially fueled by massive income divergence. A confiscatory tax on very high incomes could help to address this problem.
8. A global tax on capital is needed to control inequality and prevent injustice and instability.
Since, to my shame, I haven't read Piketty's mega-selling doorstopper, I can only comment on what I see in this summary. Two huge omissions (which may or may not be present in Piketty's original) are:
1. No mention of AI. The summary contains some projections into the future about the trajectory of wealth, the relative value of labor, and so on, but says nothing about the impact of AI. That might have almost been excusable in 2013 when Piketty's original book (in French) came out. That was just at the dawn of what has since emerged as the AI boom we are currently in. If Piketty had been thinking about AI at all, it might have been in the context of the repeated AI winters that had stained the long-overhyped field since its origin in the 1950s. Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models and other AI techniques have led to jaw-dropping results, finally delivering on some of the hype. AI threatens (or promises, depending on how you see it) to substantially re-write the rules for capital and labor. Anyone who thinks they can predict our economic future, now that AI is here, is probably lying. As I write this review, almost every corporation, government, or individual who doesn't want to be left in the dirt is struggling to incorporate AI into their operations. Those who get there last or not at all may become the next Blockbuster Video. What the world looks like after that shakes out is anyone's guess. The worst-case scenarios are the stuff of nightmares, with vast and growing numbers of people rendered structurally unemployable by a technology that learns every replacement job faster than any human can. Capital might stop requiring labor. But then Capital might also stop needing owners.
2. No mention of genetic inequality and the critical role it plays in creating and sustaining economic inequality. For example, the summary book only considers exosomatic inheritance, for example in this passage:
CEO David Zaslav of Discovery Communication had the biggest pay inequity. He earned $156.1 million in 2014, which means his compensation was 1,951 times that of Discovery Communication’s median worker, who earned $80,000. This is a huge disparity in itself, but it looms even larger if one considers that the inequality is multiplied year over year. The median worker can save much less in each year than Zaslav. That means Zaslav’s fortune will be thousands and thousands of times greater than the median worker’s when he passes it on to his heirs. With their wealth, connections, and access to the best education, Zaslav’s heirs in turn will be in a position to earn exorbitant salaries themselves.While Zaslav's heirs will certainly have a big head start with "their wealth, connections, and access to the best education", the following books suggest an equal or perhaps even more critical advantage will come from inheriting half of Zaslav's genome:
* Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are (2019) by Robert Plomin
* In the Know: Debunking 35 Myths about Human Intelligence (2020) by Russell T. Warne
And if Zaslav managed to woo a wife with similar genetic advantages, his offspring might be even more likely to perpetuate their genetic advantage. This phenomenon is known as cognitive stratification.
If genetic differences contribute to economic inequality, then it will be hard for social engineering to fully compensate. There will be a constant tendency for political backsliding, much as we seeing now that the rapist and convicted felon TACO is back in the White House, raising taxes on the working poor through tariffs, and doling out tax breaks to himself and his billionaire buddies. While exploding the debt, which as Piketty explains works to further advantage the very rich.
A real and durable solution to economic inequality might require eliminating genetic inequality. For one person's thoughts on how this might play out, see Super-Intelligent Humans Are Coming.
August 10, 2017
I read the summary 'mini version' book instead of the actual book (100+ vs 1000+). Mainly because I wanted an idea of it before I committed to the original. Also, as a student, I know I won't have the time to read such an impactful book AND thoroughly enjoy it. So that's how I took the shameful idea to get this 'mini version', and frankly, I completely loved it and don't regret getting it.
May 31, 2019
Succinct summary of a now-classic
For the kindle price of a few bucks, this is a satisfying, focused distillation of the main points of the French economist—his politics, his methodology, and even his prose style.
For the kindle price of a few bucks, this is a satisfying, focused distillation of the main points of the French economist—his politics, his methodology, and even his prose style.
October 23, 2020
Tried to read the full version a few years ago life is too short although I was aware that it contained important messages. This succinct summary ticks the boxes and I got a lot from it. A good example of the 80/20 rule at work. Worth spending an hour on.
November 29, 2020
A concise summary
Earlier this year I read “Capital in the Twentieth Century”. Most of it went right over my head. This summary book was good in that it concisely explains Piketty’s theories.
Earlier this year I read “Capital in the Twentieth Century”. Most of it went right over my head. This summary book was good in that it concisely explains Piketty’s theories.
June 7, 2023
I hope we never make it to Mars so all the rich people can't escape global taxation
June 11, 2016
As a news junkie, I have seen several brief discussions of this book. Piketty is a French economist that puts forward strong arguments about the dangers of the growing wealth inequality. He notes that a solid middle class is a recent phenomenon and largely due to the massive disruptions of the First and Second World Wars. High levels of taxation reduced the accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few as that accumulation is a process that has a powerful feedback loop. As capital accumulates in the hands of a few, they have the means to earn more in interest, return on investments and pass it along to their heirs.
This summary is consistent with what I have seen on the news shows and extends the explanation even further. Conservatives wedded to the principle of supply side economics and the value of tax cuts for the rich will find this summary and the book it describes appalling. For the arguments are for much higher taxes on the wealthy, including taxes on the movement of capital between nations. This would prevent the development of international tax shelters, something that governments don’t like and would like to do something about. However, they are terrified that any increase in the taxes on capital will cause it to flee from their jurisdiction.
As I read through the summary I was convinced that I needed to read the book and that it should be required reading of all policy makers on both sides of the arguments made by Piketty. It could very well live up to the title and be a policy manual for how capital is managed by governments in the twenty-first century.
This book was made available for free for review purposes.
This summary is consistent with what I have seen on the news shows and extends the explanation even further. Conservatives wedded to the principle of supply side economics and the value of tax cuts for the rich will find this summary and the book it describes appalling. For the arguments are for much higher taxes on the wealthy, including taxes on the movement of capital between nations. This would prevent the development of international tax shelters, something that governments don’t like and would like to do something about. However, they are terrified that any increase in the taxes on capital will cause it to flee from their jurisdiction.
As I read through the summary I was convinced that I needed to read the book and that it should be required reading of all policy makers on both sides of the arguments made by Piketty. It could very well live up to the title and be a policy manual for how capital is managed by governments in the twenty-first century.
This book was made available for free for review purposes.
June 16, 2016
Capital in the Twenty-first Century by Thomas Riketty, a French economist, is a study of inequity, both historically and currently. Although it focuses on France and Europe, the illustration of how the concentration of wealth, and the subsequent income gaps caused by the difference in rate of return on capital and economic growth, have changed over time. The author also shows how economic predictions and theories are more political than scientific, his own included.
Summary of Capital in the Twenty-first Century by Thomas Riketty by Instaread provides an analysis of the book, with discussion of the main themes and the author’s style and credentials. This pocket summary, which can be read in 15 minutes, is an efficient way to review new books before buying them.
I received a complimentary copy of this book in exchange for my unbiased review.
Summary of Capital in the Twenty-first Century by Thomas Riketty by Instaread provides an analysis of the book, with discussion of the main themes and the author’s style and credentials. This pocket summary, which can be read in 15 minutes, is an efficient way to review new books before buying them.
I received a complimentary copy of this book in exchange for my unbiased review.
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews