So the thing is, I’m not really buying in to this Memory Man series. I know I’ve set about reading these in reverse order (this is book 4 and I’d previously read the latest episode, book 5) and that can’t help, but I really don’t think it would have made much difference if I had read them in sequence. I do like Decker, but it’s elements of the narrative and some of the detail that I really have a problem with. But I’ll come back to that.
For those not already familiar with Amos Decker, the short catch-up is that he works for the FBI and following a head injury, sustained in his first (and last) professional football match, he has effectively developed photographic memory. The memory thing is, in fact, an accepted medical condition, though I really don’t know whether it ever takes the precise form Decker benefits from. I say benefits, but there are drawbacks too – his family were brutally murdered some years ago and images of the aftermath haunt him to this day. So far so good, as the fact that he has perfect recall short-cuts lengthy backtracking amongst police files etcetera and does keep the story bouncing along.
In this tale, Decker is holidaying with his FBI partner and close friend, Alex Jamison, when he spots what he thinks is a fire in a neighbouring house. His subsequent discovery starts a murder enquiry which causes him to abandon all thoughts of a break and leap neck deep into helping the local police force track down the killer(s). The interactions between Decker, Jamison and the local cops is really well executed, I think, with parochial possessiveness on the part of the police officers gradually giving way to begrudging acceptance of the offered (pushed upon) assistance. At this point the wider picture becomes known and it’s clear that the police face a bigger problem than just this case, there are strange things going on in this town – very strange things. It’s not yet clear whether there is a pattern created by this case and other unsolved murders, but Decker is convinced there is a link and he means to find out what it is. So full marks from me for the set-up.
The problem for me from this point is three-fold:
1. I was irritated by three separate characters iterating the abbreviation ‘FYI’. Not ‘for your information’, just the acronym. Now maybe this is common form for FBI employees but when a third person slipped it into a conversation it was just too much for me. Yes, I do get upset by little things.
2. The plot quickly becomes too tangled, too unlikely and far too over-engineered for my personal taste. I prefer things kept simple, or at least simpler.
3. I’m not going to give away the detail but there’s a clue here, a piece of deduction from Decker based on something he spots – partly due to his gift - that also plays out in book 5. The self same thing gives away a secret that allows him to crack a case. Now, come on!
On the upside, I do think Decker is an engaging and interesting character (though I find Jamison somewhat irritating) and I think if you’re looking for a bit of fun and escapism there is far worse material out there. But judging Baldacci on this form against, say, Michael Connelly or John Sandford, I’m afraid he comes up some way short. Will I track down books 1 – 3 at some point? I doubt it. But on the other hand if I’m struggling for find material from my favourite crime scribblers I just might. Any port in a storm, I guess. It's three and a half stars for this one from me.