It is very hard to rate this one, but in rating this one, no I won't rate it, oh yes I will rate it as it is in rating that one learns to rate, even when one is not actually rating, and a rater is in the process of rating being rating.
I am exaggering a little (seriously only a little bit) but this is how you begin to write when you read too much Gertrude Stein.
I enjoyed this more than The Making of Americans because there was just TOO MUCH repetition in that large ambitious, experimental and incredibly arrogant book.
Geography and Plays is much more enjoyable and fascinating to read because Stein adopts a different style, tone, level of clarity and 'theme' or 'story' (if you can call it that) from chapter to chapter. I ended up writing down about 30-40 quotations from this book. Every 4-5 pages, I came across an incredible sentence - something which sounded like it came out of a non-sensical nursery rhyme on acid. I loved these sentences and as I read through this book hungered for the next weird but totally singular and unforgettable sentence. If you read them out aloud, in fact, some of these sentences were hysterically funny. I still had NO IDEA what she was talking about for about 80 - 90% of the book. But that's cool. As Liam Gallagher once said, "you gotta roll with it. you gotta take your time."
Because of the variety of styles I enjoyed this book much more than The Making of Americans, a book which should not be read in full unless you are as insane as me, or unless you are a real Stein completist. Seriously - reading that book will tell test the strength of thine own sanity. Be forewarned!
Geography and Plays, on the other hand, may still be unreadable to some, to some it may be slightly unreadable whereas for others being reading Stein, aware of being reading her books and being living simultaneously, they may find it slightly readable. There are also others who may find it completely unreadable and others who find it immensely readable. Okay, I'll stop there. Enough, Gertrude, enough.
I am poking fun at her but to be honest, I also admire her. She obviously very strongly felt at the time, as did many of her stellar and now legendary contemporaries which includes Ezra Pound, t s eliot, James Joyce, Ernest Hemingway, and H.D., just to name a few, that English literature was in a stale state of affairs. They were looking to break new ground (or "make it new" as Pound once famously said and which became a kind of rallying cry to the imagist cause) and all of them did in their own special and great ways. Hemingway is probably the most celebrated of all of these writers because he is the easiest one to read. I always find it fascinating how Stein, who is one of the hardest modernist writers to read in English, was incredibly fond of and close to Ernest Hemingway, one of the easiest writers to read in English. William Carlos Williams also was a huge fan of her writing and always championed her cause, as did Sherwood Anderson and many others.
If you haven't read any Stein before, I recommend starting with something slightly shorter, such as Three Lives, or one of her portraits (Picasso or Matisse etc.) or the very readable and enjoyable The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas (which is still my favorite Stein book so far) but if you are feeling up for the challenge, I recommend this one too - a book that will completely, albeit temporarily, rearrange your mental architecture, for good or for worse. And you'll come out the other side still scratching your head, just like you might after going to an abstract art exhibition. She is a writer of that ilk. But truly one of a kind. I'm sure she has been imitated since but as far as I can tell, there was NOBODY writing the way she was at the time.
What I admire most about her is that surely, being an intelligent woman, she knew that she would be openly facing immense ridicule and misunderstanding from her reading audience, but it didn't matter. She had to do it anyway and for that, Gertrude, I salute you and say 'chapeau'!