I loved the first Stella book so was so excited to dive into the second, but it was a big disappointment.
What it did well: the looks into Mexican and Vietnamese culture were still great, and Stella continued to grow in overcoming her shyness. I also enjoyed the presentation of Stella's brother getting older and their relationship changing, but him still loving her, and Stella's relationship with her mom is realistic and lovely.
What it did poorly: It very much sold the idea that the main thing needed to cure the ocean being in crisis (something repeatedly emphasized with much urgency) was for individuals to change their habits (rather than big companies being regulated; that entire narrative of individual responsibility for conservation came from the big corporations that don't want to change so they put the onus elsewhere, and this book pushed it hard). These changes were presented as very black and white, in the framework that if you were a good person of course you'd take the easy steps of not using any plastic bags, straws, etc. It also was very negative in it's presentation; when the kids would correct each other they'd say, "No, you can't do that! That would create plastic waste!" with the kid reacting by feeling guilty instead of, "Is there an alternative we could use that wouldn't create plastic waste?" with a reaction of empowerment and looking for opportunities. This kind of black and white, overly simplistic, all or nothing thinking is not only ableist (as a disabled family I had to talk to my kids and reassure them that they weren't bad people for using plastic as we need), it is the kind of thinking that burns kids out and turns them off conservation, because they learn before long things aren't as simple as presented and thus usually give up because constantly failing at perfection is too hard to face. Conversation is a marathon, not a sprint, and this book encourages kids to sprint, which is unsustainable.
There was so much potential here, and I'm very disappointed.
A4 R5 K5