This book could have been written by a PR team. It pulls at all the right heartstrings to manipulate an American reader - democracy, identity, self-expression - while completely glossing over or downright ignoring anything and everything about Taiwan and its history the knowledge of which might cause an American to rethink their commitment to this island.
Taiwan, in the authors' imagination, is a perpetual victim, never an aggressor. Taiwan's version of Chinese irredentism, so much stronger than the PRC's, is erased. Taiwan's history of plotting to take over China, often by manufacturing an inducement for American support, is erased. Taiwan's brutal crackdowns on speech and dissent is glossed over in a couple lines, just like how they deal with the 28 February Incident, which had some two orders of magnitude more deaths than Tiananmen Square!
I would have been less critical of this book if not for one of the earliest claims it makes: "The authors have striven to write a book that is impartial". To claim to be impartial at the start of 250 pages of polemical hagiography of Taiwan and demonography of China reveals either a malicious disregard for the truth or a more benign but perhaps even more concerning level of self-deception. Neither can I countenance.
Here's a flavor of what passes as impartial in this book. "Taiwan was passive rather than an active participant," (206) which requires some pretty willful ignorance to buy; "Colonized, occupied, conquered, the final issue for modern Taiwanese is how they understand their identity..." (206) nevermind that the people who see themselves as Taiwanese today were the colonizers, occupiers, and conquerors, better to make them a victim with careful wording to elide that fact. "The ROC claimed all of the Mainland as its legitimate territory, and the PRC claimed Taiwan. It was as simple as that." (209) Well, no, it's not that simple. Taiwan also claimed Mongolia and some other areas around the border that the Communist Party has accepted don't belong to them.
Indeed, following on that last quote, this book itself offers a slightly more benign view of the Communist Party when it acknowledges that, "In 1949, the new state existed as a blur. It had over 26 land border disputes with its neighbours. Over the following decades, all but those with India and Bhutan were resolved, often territorially to the favour of others, but at least giving the PRC a sense of stability and security." (54)
The claim to impartiality was what got me through the first hundred pages. When I realized that there would be no balancing act, no offering the PRC's perspective, no attempt whatsoever to temper the polemics, I decided to finish this book so I could write an excoriating review, and so I have. It's still a waste of time having read this book, but there are so few books about Taiwan that actually take a neutral view or that explore the darker days of martial law, that I was willing to sit through this to try to extract a little bit more information about these issues, and indeed I have come away with a broader perspective, so I'm content.