I bought this book hoping to read something biblically challenging on the much discussed subject of hell, but I soon regreted it. I was unable to make it past the first three chapters, because while there was some biblical work done in support of several of the points the author was trying to make, when it came to his main subject, it was sorely lacking, and the author relied heavily on his own suppositions and assertions, treating them as truth, rather than use the Bible as the basis for finding the answers.
From the beginning you could tell that the basis for the view he holds on what is hell, was his own understanding of the traditional teaching on the subject and how that paints God, instead of what the Bible actually teaches. He begins by saying: "If it is wrong for humans to torture other creatures for a period of time, is it not also wrong for God to torture people for a period of time?" This is mischaracterising our Holy God's righteousness and justice by diminishing it to mere torture.
He also says: "God cannot torture people without sinning, which means God cannot torture people at all." Again, the author is taking it upon himself to judge God and decide that by punishing sin and evil in the wicked and unrepentant, He is in fact simply torturing, and what's more, he calls such act a sin, something which he has no authority to do. Only God can declare what is sin and He is above the rules He sets for us.
He makes that old classic mistake of saying "God is love" while forgetting that that is not all He is. God is also holy, just and righteous, and He will by no means let evil unpunished. He will, however, give every evildoer - all of us - every chance to repent and receive forgiveness, but for those who reject it, punishment it is.
I also don't like the fact that the author writes with absolute conviction, to the point of arrogance, when he tells us what the truth really is in the Bible, instead of being humble and openminded about it.
I strongly agree that we should be using the original words of the text instead of translating them all to "hell", a word that was not even in the Bible originally. I believe this violates the command of not adding to or removing from the Word of God. Having said that, his interpretation of the word "Hades" is confusing and forced in my opinion. While the meaning he gives to it might be appropriate in some specific use of it in the Bible, it certainly cannot be true of all the instances where we find it. The Bible seem to describe "Hades" as a place, and the author's attempt to convince us to see it as something else is unconvincing.
He also writes, "The Lake of Fire is not traditional hell where people suffer and burn for eternity. They are not in torment there, but are sent there to escape their torment..." I cannot, however, reconcile this with Rev. 20 where we read of the devil, the beast and the false prophet who will be tormented there day and night, forever and ever. If the Lake of Fire is a place of eternal torment for the devil and his angels, then how are the people being thrown there not tormented as well? The only way the author's theory might be even remotely correct is if the devil, the beast and the false prophet are not actual physical beings, but represent something else entirely. And that would be beyond my understanding. I will concede that there might not be a specific text in the Bible mentioning humans being burned in the Lake of Fire forever and ever, but even if their chosen destiny is for their "body and soul to be destroyed in Gehenna" and then cease to exist, this is still a terrible punishment, and indeed torment, no matter how brief.
The author really tries to come up with a different interpretation of the lake of fire, or the second death, that some will end up suffering, in a misguided attempt to save God's image and appease his own inability to understand why God would do this to many people. And like so many, he completely fails to understand that God is not only love, but also righteous and just, and the unrepentant wicked are choosing their own destruction. God's wrath upon them is just and deserved, even if we cannot feel that way now. But we will, once we're in His presence.
Verdict: Not recommended.