What do you think?
Rate this book
Warfighting: MCDP 1
The manual describes the general strategy for the U.S. Marines but it is beneficial for not only every Marine to read but concepts on leadership can be gathered to lead a business to a family. If you want to see what make Marines so effective this book is a good place to start.
84 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1994
197 people are currently reading
1450 people want to read
About the author
U.S. Marine Corps
2,061 books60 followersThe U.S. Marine Corps is a branch of the United States Armed Forces responsible for providing power projection from the sea, using the mobility of the United States Navy to deliver combined-arms task forces rapidly. It is one of seven uniformed services of the United States. In the civilian leadership structure of the United States military, the Marine Corps is a component of the United States Department of the Navy, often working closely with U.S. naval forces for training, transportation, and logistic purposes; however, in the military leadership structure the Marine Corps is a separate branch.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 74 reviews
December 3, 2020
MCDP-1 (Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication) is a short but illustrative document that outlines the Marines' (the United States' "expeditionary force-in-readiness") philosophy on warfighting. It begins with a brief discussion on the nature of war – i.e., what it is and what it is not – before discussing the theory, practice, and conduct of war.
War, defined as "the violent struggle between two hostile, independent, and irreconcilable wills, each trying to impose itself on the other", is, unfortunately, an inescapable reality of human existence. It is, the Marines note soberly, one of "the greatest horrors known to humanity", and as such should "never be romanticized". But insofar as it is an inexorable part of social reality, there must be some entity which assumes the terrible burden of executing and honing a nation's capability for warfare, especially because it is as much a timeless fixture of human existence as it is ever changing.
To this end, the Marines' doctrine is based on maneuver warfare, which is itself characterized by the rapid, flexible, and opportunistic application of maneuvers and tactics to incapacitate an enemy's ability to fight back. Because the nature of war is inherently unpredictable and disorderly, and because the logistics of war are constantly evolving with new technology, MCDP argues that precise planning will always be far less effective than developing a general disposition and philosophy that is radically adaptable to changing circumstances.
The implications of this seemingly tautological claim are not obvious. Because war is highly situational, creating an abstract set of rules for engagement is self-defeating. Instead, MCDP opts to outline a broad set of virtues, character traits, and ends, rather than specific procedures, requirements, or means. Because "success" in warfare often resists quantitative measurement in favor of qualitative evaluation, these guidelines include:
- The recognition that successful warfare depends primarily on developing a superior position to your adversary in the "rhythm" or "tempo" of war. Thus, it is important to obtain...
- ... tactical advantages such as speed, focus, surprise, and boldness. These advantages come to those who possess...
- ... virtues such as: decisiveness, "fortitude, perseverance, boldness, esprit", creativity, and adaptability, among others, and necessitate an organizational structure which encourages members to engage in...
- ... open and frank dialogue, effective and concise communication, and additionally allows for...
- ... decentralized and autonomous decision-making, where individuals are empowered to make decisions to accomplish missions that harmonize with broader strategic goals.
It goes without saying that these principles are germane not only to warfighting, but to excellent organizations in a variety of other contexts, including those situations less macabre and adversarial than warfare.
War, defined as "the violent struggle between two hostile, independent, and irreconcilable wills, each trying to impose itself on the other", is, unfortunately, an inescapable reality of human existence. It is, the Marines note soberly, one of "the greatest horrors known to humanity", and as such should "never be romanticized". But insofar as it is an inexorable part of social reality, there must be some entity which assumes the terrible burden of executing and honing a nation's capability for warfare, especially because it is as much a timeless fixture of human existence as it is ever changing.
To this end, the Marines' doctrine is based on maneuver warfare, which is itself characterized by the rapid, flexible, and opportunistic application of maneuvers and tactics to incapacitate an enemy's ability to fight back. Because the nature of war is inherently unpredictable and disorderly, and because the logistics of war are constantly evolving with new technology, MCDP argues that precise planning will always be far less effective than developing a general disposition and philosophy that is radically adaptable to changing circumstances.
The implications of this seemingly tautological claim are not obvious. Because war is highly situational, creating an abstract set of rules for engagement is self-defeating. Instead, MCDP opts to outline a broad set of virtues, character traits, and ends, rather than specific procedures, requirements, or means. Because "success" in warfare often resists quantitative measurement in favor of qualitative evaluation, these guidelines include:
- The recognition that successful warfare depends primarily on developing a superior position to your adversary in the "rhythm" or "tempo" of war. Thus, it is important to obtain...
- ... tactical advantages such as speed, focus, surprise, and boldness. These advantages come to those who possess...
- ... virtues such as: decisiveness, "fortitude, perseverance, boldness, esprit", creativity, and adaptability, among others, and necessitate an organizational structure which encourages members to engage in...
- ... open and frank dialogue, effective and concise communication, and additionally allows for...
- ... decentralized and autonomous decision-making, where individuals are empowered to make decisions to accomplish missions that harmonize with broader strategic goals.
It goes without saying that these principles are germane not only to warfighting, but to excellent organizations in a variety of other contexts, including those situations less macabre and adversarial than warfare.
Read
July 2, 2025Goodreads regular Alex reminded me of this quote from Machiavelli: "It's better to be impulsive than cautious; fortune is female and if you want to stay on top of her you have to slap and thrust."
Since that's a poetic (if vulgar) summary of one tenet of Marine Corps philosophy, I'll let that stand as my review of this book for now. Honestly, Warfighting contains some very surprising revelations that might radically change how an outsider views the hierarchy and philosophy of the U.S. Marines. It's also a double whammy, since it distills Machiavelli and Sun Tzu into one (rather prosaic) text.
Read it especially if you never thought you would ever want to read any such book. Respond as you see fit.
Since that's a poetic (if vulgar) summary of one tenet of Marine Corps philosophy, I'll let that stand as my review of this book for now. Honestly, Warfighting contains some very surprising revelations that might radically change how an outsider views the hierarchy and philosophy of the U.S. Marines. It's also a double whammy, since it distills Machiavelli and Sun Tzu into one (rather prosaic) text.
Read it especially if you never thought you would ever want to read any such book. Respond as you see fit.
July 27, 2018
This is an AMAZING book, probably the best book in its genre ever written.
I am not one of those military buffs, but I've long been fascinated by whether there was a "theory of war" that explains the "why" of military strategy and could put you in the mind of a top military commander. This book comes as close as any I've seen.
The genius is in it's simplicity. Tomes like Clausewitz's "On War" are long and ponderous and the justly famous Sun Tzu's "The Art of War" is kind of obscure and allusive, but this is a very short and straightforward work.
The first two sections (out of four) are the most relevant to a general audience. They describe the general philosophy and most important strategic considerations in the Marines approach to war fighting. They then describe some of the important tactical approaches that are used in their philosophy.
The distinction between the attrition style warfare and the maneuver style is particularly interesting. Generally speaking, the attrition style is sheer brute strength while the maneuver style relies more on speed and stealth to gain an advantage. The maneuver style requires more skill and a bit of luck, but if pulled off can lead to a quicker victory at much lower cost.
And of course for a civilian the important thing is that most of these strategic considerations apply not just to military conflict, but to any sort of conflict.
I am not one of those military buffs, but I've long been fascinated by whether there was a "theory of war" that explains the "why" of military strategy and could put you in the mind of a top military commander. This book comes as close as any I've seen.
The genius is in it's simplicity. Tomes like Clausewitz's "On War" are long and ponderous and the justly famous Sun Tzu's "The Art of War" is kind of obscure and allusive, but this is a very short and straightforward work.
The first two sections (out of four) are the most relevant to a general audience. They describe the general philosophy and most important strategic considerations in the Marines approach to war fighting. They then describe some of the important tactical approaches that are used in their philosophy.
The distinction between the attrition style warfare and the maneuver style is particularly interesting. Generally speaking, the attrition style is sheer brute strength while the maneuver style relies more on speed and stealth to gain an advantage. The maneuver style requires more skill and a bit of luck, but if pulled off can lead to a quicker victory at much lower cost.
And of course for a civilian the important thing is that most of these strategic considerations apply not just to military conflict, but to any sort of conflict.
December 17, 2017
A book about leadership and management, from people who encounter much higher-stakes problems than missing this quarter’s sales projections.
Two big takeaways:
1. Despite the stereotypes, the Marines at least philosophically embrace a highly decentralized, individualized M.O. The book consistently drives home the point that people are not interchangeable: different people have different strengths, teams gel over time, and nobody can maintain maximum performance indefinitely. They also emphasize the fact that war is highly uncertain, so people need to know their long-term objective, not just their immediate assignment, so when the immediate assignment is rendered obsolete fifteen seconds after it starts, they can figure out what to do next. I thought the military was more top-down and treated people as interchangeable—the uniforms and identical haircuts really threw me off.
2. Attrition vs Maneuver warfare is a very useful dichotomy. Basically attrition is warfare as I usually think of it: head-to-head matchups where two sides grind each other down until whoever has the most men and materiel prevails. Given that the US has both of those resources in spades, you’d think we would default to that, but no: at least among the Marines, the focus is more on crippling the enemy’s ability to fight, not just bleeding them dry. The book doesn’t go into a ton of detail on exactly what that entails, but the general philosophy makes sense. And that sure must be inspiring for individual Marines: even though the US can generally win by fighting harder, we aim to fight smarter instead.
Two big takeaways:
1. Despite the stereotypes, the Marines at least philosophically embrace a highly decentralized, individualized M.O. The book consistently drives home the point that people are not interchangeable: different people have different strengths, teams gel over time, and nobody can maintain maximum performance indefinitely. They also emphasize the fact that war is highly uncertain, so people need to know their long-term objective, not just their immediate assignment, so when the immediate assignment is rendered obsolete fifteen seconds after it starts, they can figure out what to do next. I thought the military was more top-down and treated people as interchangeable—the uniforms and identical haircuts really threw me off.
2. Attrition vs Maneuver warfare is a very useful dichotomy. Basically attrition is warfare as I usually think of it: head-to-head matchups where two sides grind each other down until whoever has the most men and materiel prevails. Given that the US has both of those resources in spades, you’d think we would default to that, but no: at least among the Marines, the focus is more on crippling the enemy’s ability to fight, not just bleeding them dry. The book doesn’t go into a ton of detail on exactly what that entails, but the general philosophy makes sense. And that sure must be inspiring for individual Marines: even though the US can generally win by fighting harder, we aim to fight smarter instead.
March 16, 2022
Read it a couple times but this time I decided to add it. Why? As Sun Tzu once said, “You must be prepared to strike when your enemy leasts expects it.” I couldn’t agree more. You weren’t expecting me to drop this massive bomb on your goodreads feed (thats a thing now) but here we are. Would have given it 4 stars if it had pictures and 5 for color pictures.
December 19, 2021
“Leaders must have a strong sense of the great responsibility of their office; the resources they will expend in war are human lives.”
“Self-study in the art and science of war is at least equal in importance—and should receive at least equal time—to maintaining physical condition. This is particularly true among officers; after all, an officer’s principal weapon is his mind.”
“Self-study in the art and science of war is at least equal in importance—and should receive at least equal time—to maintaining physical condition. This is particularly true among officers; after all, an officer’s principal weapon is his mind.”
December 5, 2024
If you take out the fact it’s a USMC pub and apply the teachings to your own life and situations it really makes you look at the world quite differently
September 13, 2025
A good book to re-read every year or so. Lots of good concepts and philosophies for lots of reas of life.
February 17, 2024
Superb overview of the theory of warfare. Skip Art of War and On War and just read this instead, it is clearer and better organized.
March 29, 2022
This was very interesting. It is a philosophy of war fighting and, within it's historical context, reveals the mindset of today's warfighting leaders, their underlying assumptions and culmination of experience. There were many excellent takeaways that were applicable to a business setting. Over all an enjoyable, brief introduce to key concepts of warfighting. In light of Russian aggression and atrocity against Ukraine, this book have me a philosophical framework by which to process what is happening and to formulate paths forward to better understanding.
February 14, 2008
This was a pretty good summary of current military thinking. The first half of the book was just a rote repetition of the basics of Clausewitz' On War, with little bits of Sun Tzu and John Boyd thrown in. I give him points for having clearly read them, but there was no new information there. The second half, though, was worth reading -- he translated a number of the concepts into concrete doctrine for the Marines, and explained why Boyd's Maneuver Warfare was so successful and how to make it more so. This was written after William Lind's book on Maneuver Warfare, so it may not be necessary reading for those who aren't Marines looking for a book of doctrine, but it does fill that role admirably.
August 9, 2016
Proof that this stuff can apply to anything: I was doing my laundry as I read this, and I realized that if I just washed everything that needed washing, that would be 'attrition laundry'. But since I can't get that all done in one day, I really need to focus on the highest priority clothes and bedding: thus I found I was doing 'maneuver laundry'. Kidding aside, the most interesting part of this book for me was about commanders giving their subordinates latitude to determine how to get a job done.
September 9, 2020
This publication from the United States Marines is complementary to the Navy manual is several regards. Primarily, this book expands on unarmed combat to detail the rules for exchanging fire. The previous entry on this list serves as a perfect foundation for this material, but the bulk of massive military learning can be gleaned through this individual book alone.
January 29, 2017
I didn't know the marines could read, let alone write. Hooah!
July 19, 2020
Clear and concise overview of how the US Marine Corps approaches their training and battles. And fascinating that it is publicly available.
December 20, 2024
I can confidently assert that MCDP 1: Warfighting is not just a book, but a fundamental pillar that shapes the mindset and approach of every Marine. This publication lays the groundwork for understanding the nature of warfare, emphasizing the Marine Corps' unique approach to combat and operations.
MCDP 1 serves as the cornerstone of Marine Corps philosophy, focusing on the intricate nature of warfare. It presents a holistic view that resonates with the urgency of adaptability, the chaos of battle, and the critical importance of understanding both the enemy and our own capabilities. The doctrine articulates that war is inherently a contest of wills and that the aim should be to gain an advantage over adversaries, often through rapid decision-making and the initiative of junior leaders.
One of the key themes I found particularly impactful is the concept of “maneuver warfare.” The doctrine emphasizes fluidity, speed, and surprise—elements that I believe are crucial for modern combat, especially in the face of asymmetrical threats. The emphasis on shaping the environment, rather than simply engaging in a direct contest, aligns perfectly with the principles we study in operational planning.
The principles outlined in MCDP 1 are not just theoretical; they are immediately applicable. As I develop my leadership skills, the guidance provided on decision-making and the necessity of empowering subordinates resonates strongly. The doctrine encourages leaders at all levels to cultivate an environment where initiative is rewarded, a critical lesson as we prepare for unpredictable and dynamic situations on the battlefield.
While MCDP 1 provides a robust framework for understanding war, it is essential to view it through the lens of contemporary challenges. The publication's emphasis on adaptability is particularly relevant, as today's warfare is influenced by cyber capabilities, information warfare, and joint operations. Therefore, as we reflect on this doctrine, we must continuously adapt its principles to ensure they resonate with the realities of modern combat environments.
In conclusion, MCDP 1: Warfighting is not just a doctrine; it is a testament to the core values of the Marine Corps. It equips Marines with the necessary mindset to approach warfare with critical thinking, adaptability, and vigor. I highly recommend this publication to any Marine, whether in training or in the field, as it encapsulates the essence of our approach to war: an art that demands both knowledge and innovative application.
In my journey through the Marine Corps, I have found MCDP 1 to be a vital resource that will continue to influence my understanding of warfare and my development as a leader. It is essential reading for anyone committed to excelling in military operations.
MCDP 1 serves as the cornerstone of Marine Corps philosophy, focusing on the intricate nature of warfare. It presents a holistic view that resonates with the urgency of adaptability, the chaos of battle, and the critical importance of understanding both the enemy and our own capabilities. The doctrine articulates that war is inherently a contest of wills and that the aim should be to gain an advantage over adversaries, often through rapid decision-making and the initiative of junior leaders.
One of the key themes I found particularly impactful is the concept of “maneuver warfare.” The doctrine emphasizes fluidity, speed, and surprise—elements that I believe are crucial for modern combat, especially in the face of asymmetrical threats. The emphasis on shaping the environment, rather than simply engaging in a direct contest, aligns perfectly with the principles we study in operational planning.
The principles outlined in MCDP 1 are not just theoretical; they are immediately applicable. As I develop my leadership skills, the guidance provided on decision-making and the necessity of empowering subordinates resonates strongly. The doctrine encourages leaders at all levels to cultivate an environment where initiative is rewarded, a critical lesson as we prepare for unpredictable and dynamic situations on the battlefield.
While MCDP 1 provides a robust framework for understanding war, it is essential to view it through the lens of contemporary challenges. The publication's emphasis on adaptability is particularly relevant, as today's warfare is influenced by cyber capabilities, information warfare, and joint operations. Therefore, as we reflect on this doctrine, we must continuously adapt its principles to ensure they resonate with the realities of modern combat environments.
In conclusion, MCDP 1: Warfighting is not just a doctrine; it is a testament to the core values of the Marine Corps. It equips Marines with the necessary mindset to approach warfare with critical thinking, adaptability, and vigor. I highly recommend this publication to any Marine, whether in training or in the field, as it encapsulates the essence of our approach to war: an art that demands both knowledge and innovative application.
In my journey through the Marine Corps, I have found MCDP 1 to be a vital resource that will continue to influence my understanding of warfare and my development as a leader. It is essential reading for anyone committed to excelling in military operations.
September 29, 2025
"We must exercise discipline in the use of technology. Advanced information technology especially can tempt us to try to maintain precise, positive control over subordinates, which is incompatible with the Marine Corps philosophy of command."
I forget how I thought to read this book. I do remember that I took a class in school called "Military Operations" (mainly because it satisfied the many constraints of an overscheduled semester), and that class introduced me to the idea of "military doctrine." Doctrine is essentially a philosophy and a belief system about war and how a branch / unit / community contributes to wars' means and ends.
A key piece of Marine doctrine is maneuver warfare (as opposed to attrition warfare). Maneuver warfare is designed to disrupt the system that the enemy uses to make war and is very concerned with the idea of initiative. Fighting maneuver warfare means attempting to seize the initiative and thereby dictate the terms of engagement to favor your capabilities and exploit the enemy's weaknesses (and vulnerable points in their system). Opportunities to seize initiative are fleeting and unpredictable, so the Marine's seek to inculcate in their officers as well as their enlisted men the boldness to take initiative. The view on technology follows from this philosophy, because information technology may tempt officers to exercise more precise and positive control over a situation they are distant from. Succumbing to that temptation may mean that subordinates who are experiencing the situation first hand will hesitate to identify and take opportunities to seize initiative.
Anyway, this is a quick read and an interesting look into the philosophies of the US Marines.
I forget how I thought to read this book. I do remember that I took a class in school called "Military Operations" (mainly because it satisfied the many constraints of an overscheduled semester), and that class introduced me to the idea of "military doctrine." Doctrine is essentially a philosophy and a belief system about war and how a branch / unit / community contributes to wars' means and ends.
A key piece of Marine doctrine is maneuver warfare (as opposed to attrition warfare). Maneuver warfare is designed to disrupt the system that the enemy uses to make war and is very concerned with the idea of initiative. Fighting maneuver warfare means attempting to seize the initiative and thereby dictate the terms of engagement to favor your capabilities and exploit the enemy's weaknesses (and vulnerable points in their system). Opportunities to seize initiative are fleeting and unpredictable, so the Marine's seek to inculcate in their officers as well as their enlisted men the boldness to take initiative. The view on technology follows from this philosophy, because information technology may tempt officers to exercise more precise and positive control over a situation they are distant from. Succumbing to that temptation may mean that subordinates who are experiencing the situation first hand will hesitate to identify and take opportunities to seize initiative.
Anyway, this is a quick read and an interesting look into the philosophies of the US Marines.
May 28, 2024
U.S. Marine Corps literature. Clear, concise, and valuable knowledge. This is a short book entailing the strategy, conduct, practice, and art of warfighting. Not Surprisingly, there are excerpts from Clausewitz, Tzu, Williams, and more that are expounded upon. I recommend this book to any soldier, sailor, marine, or any other warfighter that cares to learn how to effectively attack and defend. The principles in this book can also be applied to everyday life. For instance, if a person were to go to war with ants embedded in the walls of their house, they must exploit their weaknesses. Ants can cause a lot of damage to the structural integrity of a house, so eliminating them is necessary. Squishing them when they are visible will never be sufficient, they must be completely eliminated. Ants have a natural need for sugar, so to combat them, placing sweet poison in their paths will entice them to take the bait and bring it back to their nest. Their nest is a surface (hard target) while their need for sugar can be used as a gap (weak point in their defense or in this case behavior).
Read
October 22, 2025TOM MONAGHAN, CEO of Domino’s Pizza
“Replace the word ‘combat’ with competition, ‘o cer’ with manager, ‘soldier’ with front-line-worker, ‘enemy’ with rival, and War ghting becomes a remarkably trenchant management handbook.”
All actions in war take place in an atmosphere of uncertainty—the fog of war.
what is probable and what is not?
Risk is also related to gain; normally, greater potential gain requires greater risk. Further, risk is equally common to action and inaction.
the acceptance of risk does not equate to the imprudent willingness to gamble the entire likelihood of success on a single improbable event.
Courage is not the absence of fear; rather, it is the strength to overcome fear.
we seek to establish a pace that the enemy cannot maintain so that with each action his reactions are increasingly late—until eventually he is overcome by events.
The essence of the problem is to select a promising course of action with an acceptable degree of risk, and to do it more quickly than our foe. In this respect, “a good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.”
He informs his commander what he has done, but he does not wait for permission.
“Replace the word ‘combat’ with competition, ‘o cer’ with manager, ‘soldier’ with front-line-worker, ‘enemy’ with rival, and War ghting becomes a remarkably trenchant management handbook.”
All actions in war take place in an atmosphere of uncertainty—the fog of war.
what is probable and what is not?
Risk is also related to gain; normally, greater potential gain requires greater risk. Further, risk is equally common to action and inaction.
the acceptance of risk does not equate to the imprudent willingness to gamble the entire likelihood of success on a single improbable event.
Courage is not the absence of fear; rather, it is the strength to overcome fear.
we seek to establish a pace that the enemy cannot maintain so that with each action his reactions are increasingly late—until eventually he is overcome by events.
The essence of the problem is to select a promising course of action with an acceptable degree of risk, and to do it more quickly than our foe. In this respect, “a good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.”
He informs his commander what he has done, but he does not wait for permission.
September 4, 2025
Ngl it was a little dry, but that's what I've been told so I didn't really expect anything different. It wasn't awful, I'll say that much. Little different from my normal picks but I've been on a nonfiction military/war kick recently.
Overall, solid read.
Standout line: "Nor do we mean to imply that we will pass up the opportunity to physically destroy the enemy." (and the last paragraph in the conclusion, tbh it just made me feel like I was reading something important, I think it was phrased well)
Overall, solid read.
Standout line: "Nor do we mean to imply that we will pass up the opportunity to physically destroy the enemy." (and the last paragraph in the conclusion, tbh it just made me feel like I was reading something important, I think it was phrased well)
July 9, 2017
A surprisingly accurate way of thinking about the software industry. Part of this short book describes the characteristics of war in a way that anyone dealing with software will understand: friction, disorder, uncertainty, complexity. Another part of the book focuses on the need to engage in maneuver warfare, which is characterized by decentralized command, that gives the marines the speed and punch to react to novel situation, which in a certain way reminds me of agile development principles.
October 19, 2020
My rating has more to do with the terrible editing of this publication. There are many many distracting hyphenated words as if they simply used a previous printing without properly editing out previous hyphenations.
Overall, the book does contain a number of principles that can be applied to leadership and management. However, I wonder if the idea of applying military principles to business has become an outmoded notion.
Overall, the book does contain a number of principles that can be applied to leadership and management. However, I wonder if the idea of applying military principles to business has become an outmoded notion.
March 18, 2018
This is the most efficiently written book I’ve ever read. It’s incredibly well structured and outlines (what I imagine are) largely American military philosophies. I was pleasantly surprised at the strategic / organizational maxims that crossover to the business world, especially ideas that apply to effective management and corporate leadership.
June 26, 2021
Many good lessons here. The Marine interpretation of war is that it is the manifestation of multiple, complex wills imposing themselves on each other, and hence it is ever-changing and requires chosen moments of strong and weak. However, the Marine philosophy to war isn't the end-all-be-all, and I question what the weaknesses in manuever warfare are.
September 23, 2025
It's straight to the point. It provides simple, but proven ways plan and operate during and for war. As a civilian some of the methodology came as a surprise. Of course, information gathered from this won't come in handy during everyday use, but it does provide clarity on military thinking and strategy.
March 5, 2018
I read this book for a class. This book read much better than a class assignment. I was blown away with the detail contained in this book. If you are at all interested in the great USMC, this book is a must read.
April 25, 2019
Semper had us read this book. It took me longer than expected. This is a book I read as an E-book and needed to have a hard copy so I could underline and mark it. It's like the scriptures for the Marines. Pretty deep and profound.
Need to reread.
Need to reread.
December 29, 2022
A personal bible that I reference for more than just warfighting, MCDP-1 defines a way of thinking that anyone, Marine or not, will find useful in tackling any problem. I get motivated every time I read this book and get something different out of it every time.
September 25, 2025
MCDP 1 Warfighting espouses the timeless Marine Corps doctrine of maneuver warfare and combined arms. It is an essential read for every member of the military and has numerous applications to all facets of life.
December 31, 2020
Short but absolutely brilliant, best leadership book I've read and adaptable far beyond military field.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 74 reviews