I love reading the New York Times. I love the experience of traveling and discovering other worlds. I really love memoirs. Given all of that, I thought this would be a fantastic book -- or at least a really good read.
It wasn't.
Instead of the digging into the type of self-awareness that can make for a good memoir, the author chose to deliver a fairly bland travelogue. He offered up a chronology of travel stops rather than describing to me what he saw and felt and experienced during those trips. Proof? He stated at one point that he couldn't really remember what happened during his travels because they weren't that real to him.
Seriously.
That disassociation was apparent throughout the book as he talked non-stop about how he both didn't really understand why people wanted to travel, nor really understood why they wanted to stay home either.
Why are you a travel writer again?
He even had an opportunity to travel back and trace his family's roots in Eastern Europe where he discovered that the whole village his people were from had been wiped out by a pogrom. Only... he didn't really feel a connection to the experience because he didn't feel particularly Jewish. (Or maybe... Maybe you don't feel particularly Jewish because your whole culture and roots to your identity were wiped out in a genocide so your genealogical legacy is to wander the globe never feeling truly at home anywhere. So maybe that's something you could look into.)
Or not. Whatever.
He spent a lengthy section of the book talking about how he wasn't close to his brother because once when he was in high school, his brother told his family at the dinner table who the author had a crush on. And so 20 years later, after whole sections of the book were devoted to how annoying he found his brother during a trip to Montreal, he decided to say something about it. And of course the brother had seriously no idea what the author was even talking about.
Me either.
And worst of all -- his writing was deeply unengaging, skipped back and forth in time so awkwardly I frequently lost the thread, and was filled with the type of boasts that only someone without self-awareness of his own white, male privilege would possibly feel the need to divulge to the world. A tendency that was never more apparently than early in the book when he actually printed, word-for-word, an email his boss sent around praising the fact that the author's writing had recently gotten better.
Really. That happened.
One time someone told him that his writing wasn't as crappy as it used to be.
Yes, Matt Gross rambles.Yes, he jumps around from trip to trip and year to year without notice. From the reviews I've seen here, some people couldn't deal with that. Fine. But Gross writes the way many (most?) of us discuss our travel histories. He connects with some of us, He doesn't connect with others. That's fine, because for those he does connect with (I count myself among them), this is a book that gets you thinking about where you've been and what you've done and why. Why do we travel? What do we want from travel? Gross's experiences resonate. For me, this book works.
Hmmm, not what I thought it was going to be. While there is certainly some travel in this memoir, it's far more the author's musings on his own philosophy of travel than it is a travel memoir. I was hoping for well-written stories from 'round the world and instead was mostly inside Matt Gross's head, and inside his head it's not particularly eloquent. Not my cup of tea, but it might be yours.
What made Matt Gross' columns as "The Frugal Traveler" for the New York Times so engaging was the fact that he is, first and foremost, a good writer. He tells a story -- not about the broad details of a place, but about how he experienced it. There are far too many "be sure to eat at this restaurant" guides out there today. What Matt is able to do is give his readers a reason to go out and explore.
This book continues what has worked in his past writing, blending travel stories about people and places with his own memoirs and experiences as a travel writer. This book is not a travel guide -- and other reviewers may complain about this fact, but I see it as a strength. What Matt does well in this book is tell a good story.
And, at the end of the day, what all of us want from our travels are those great stories.
He should have stuck to short-form journalism or blogs. Had to abandon this one after 100 pages as it was too boring and self-centered. I never made it to the Turks who loved apples, which was the title that caught my eye. :(
I went to high school with Matt, and it was delightful to read this book and find he is the same frank, authentic, smart, self-assured/self-conscious, competent and kind blend of a person he was then. I confess I knew nothing of the Frugal Traveler prior to this point, but what a great adventure he's had, for which I'm glad. I appreciate the human in travel writing, and this book, part-memoir, part-travelogue, all invitation to see the world through one particular, if relatively cosmopolitan, perspective and maybe, just maybe, take a trip somewhere yourself, was just what I was wanting when I was looking for an "escape" memoir/travel book, picked it up because the title caught my eye, and idly thought, "Hey, I knew a guy named Matt Gross, he was in my AP French class, skater dude, nice guy" only to find that yes, indeed, here he is. Well done, Matt!
When you hear the words "travel writers" the names: Rolf Potts, Doug Lansky, Rick Steeves and Matt Kepnes spring to mind. They are travel writers that have written about their adventures over the world, shared their highs and lows with us and inspired us to travel. Matt Gross is not in this group. A former writing for the New York Times, I very much wanted to hear from the writer that inspired me to travel on a budget. I couldn't be more disappointed with this book. In this offering, Gross writes about his 30 years of travel around the world, but with a focus on Vietnam and Cambodia, then a sad attempt at the philosophy of "getting lost" and ending with the experience of traveling with his family. He offers no excitement in his writing, no humor, no suspense and no cohesion in his narrative. There is no description of the places he's been to, the things he's seen, the ups and downs, just him describing random events in a jumbled manner. He will begin to describe a situation, then without a thought jump to another completely unrelated part of the world in another time and with nothing to join the former with the latter. His writing is difficult to follow, difficult to care about. When he describes the four roommates he had and the landlady who rented his apartment in Vietnam, they are nothing but a passing thought. Interestingly, he spends more time discussing his experience with a prostitute than with the friends he's met along the way. As an extra tasteless nod he includes a mild fetishizing of Asian women being attracted to his background in his book. If this book had come from a first time traveler with no writing experience, I could have forgiven the author. I had high expectations from Gross and I'm sad to say he's failed to live up to the writings of the authors I mentioned above. Perhaps in his next work, he will be able to call himself a travel writer.
Another disappointment. This book looked so interesting to begin with and I read a couple of pages and liked the style. It wasn't until I got into it that I realized that he not only lost his way around the world (see title), he lost his way in his narrative.
It's a bit like listening to a garrulous story teller saying, "Now where was I?" and "That reminds me off the time I left my underwear in Cambodia yuk yuk, now what made me think of that". It's so random and he's so self-satisfied. Even his criticism of himself and his sorta self-analysis come off smug.
There's no theme to this book, no unifying idea, no analysis, no real insight. The chapters are arbitrary divisions and he wanders around like a lost soul, trying to be interesting. Actually, a lost soul would be more interesting.
I wanted so badly to like this book by the former Frugal Travel columnist at The New York Times but it's a weak and wasted effort. The best parts are quick glimpses of exotic lands where Gross felt truly challenged, but the volume is marred by overly self-conscious internal dialogues such as the hoary discussion over whether after all this time the author considered himself a "traveler" or a "tourist." For Chrissakes, the author was a neither -- rather Gross was a well compensated travel writer working for one of the most prominent newspapers on the planet. Too bad the experience didn't teach Gross how to tell a story spanning more than 1,500 words. Goes to show not every blogger (or reporter) can write a book worth reading.
The premise of this book interested me because I love to travel. However soon after starting this book I realized Matt Gross and I would not make great travel companions. I found him a little condescending and self-righteous. He likes immersing himself in a culture rather than seeing the sights but it is unrealistic for him to expect that of anybody who spends less than a year in one spot... Even he himself can tell tales from each country but he never became a part of that culture. So trying to achieve this is futile in my eyes. I didn't learn much from this book about parts of the world I want to travel to, not because he didn't go there, but because he approached his travels in such a different way than I would.
Usually I love short stories and travel stories but Matt Gross, while having interesting adventures, just can't seem to tell us a story all the way through. The reading is very choppy because each chapter seems to start out telling us an adventure and then suddenly we veer off on random tangents. But we never seem to come back and finish the original story! I would wonder while reading, "Umm, are we going to come back to the crazy guy pulled over by the cop? Does this somehow relate to the crazy guy? When is the crazy guy coming back? What happened to the crazy guy?!!!" It becomes very distracting. The stories were interesting. Gross has a nice way with words, but the format drove me crazy.
Halfway through and will not waste my time any further. To put it simply, this is the most unreflected travelogue (if you can call it that, since it‘s more of a completely discombobulated exercise in navel-gazing) I have ever had the misfortune to read. Especially the South Asia parts differ none at all from the typical “White Western guy goes to SE Asia to live on the cheap, gets drunk, eats food, reduces SE Asian women to stereotypes“ narrative. So disappointed.
I bought a used copy of this book and the note I found inside (from a mother to her daughter) frankly conveyed more emotional depth than this book.
What a waste of time. Surprising since I enjoyed his Frugal Traveler column in the NYT. Self-indulgent, shallow and silly, it taxed my long standing rule of finishing every book I start. His arm must ache from constantly patting himself on the back. If there was a prize for pettiness, he'd win it annually.
I will say I enjoyed the two or three pages mid book where he describes his time with the title character. Too bad there wasn't more of that and less of Thai prostitutes, condoms, his brother Steve and his wife's thong panties.
I like the Frugal Traveler column in the New York Times and have been a follower for some time. This book, from the column author, was a jumble of personal thoughts, experiences and inner monologues on the authors life and travels. It did not sustain my interest or provide any insights on travel.
This made me desperate for travel, in a year when I've gone nowhere because of Covid restrictions. I can't praise this book enough, and I almost teared up a couple times just for the memories of my previous trips, and the longing for more.
I picked this up, because I'm also a long-term traveler and thought it would be fun to relate. And I did. I've gone through a couple of his travel mindset changes myself. I enjoyed his writing style--first time reader--and found it interesting how some of his experiences have been very different from mine simply by being a white male in certain parts of the world. One thing I found confusing and off-putting was including stories about prostitutes. Short of doing so to reaffirm that travelers should never exploit the locals, it's a bad look. Unfortunately, he exploited a local prostitute, wrote about why it was bad to do so, then confirmed that he would do it again if he could rewind time. Not a good look and really shaded how I read the rest of the book. I'm certain he has loads of stories to choose from, and I would have preferred a shorter book or a different story. That aside, it's a good example of the ups and downs of long-term travel, good for someone who has never done it to learn or for someone who has, to relate.
For once I get to read a travel writer who is a lot like me: neurotic and an over thinker. It seems like many of Matt Gross's anxieties about traveling and fitting in and doing the right thing are my anxieties, too. For that reason, this book was very engaging for me-- for once there's somebody out there who is both comfortable and uncomfortable in the world and own skin.
Gross, who once wrote as the NY Times "Frugal Traveler", recounts his experiences and reflections on traveling and being a travel writer. He covers everything from making friends with a variety of people, becoming enemies with your bowels, coping with the poverty and mores of third world countries, traveling with family, and, ultimately, the complexity of coming home. If you are a novice traveler or a seasoned one, this book provides many insights on what it means to see the world.
Some really great stories, and a few interesting perspectives from a well seasoned traveler, though Gross can ramble a bit, which can be distracting. Overall good read, particularly if you enjoy his style of writing.
This book moved very slow and jumped around in time during stories. I struggled to read this for over a year and recently finished it on vacation, it was a waste of packing space.
Gross' "The Turk Who Loved Apples" is an engrossing read (no pun intended). It helps that I could identify quite a bit with some of Gross' characteristics, like his fear of death, interest in tracing his roots, and general interest in how we travel. But even if that doesn't sound like you, Gross does a terrific job putting the reader in the scene. He even breaks down the formula he uses to put readers in the scene, which is surely particularly helpful to aspiring travel writers.
Recently I had the chance to read The Turk who Loved Apples as I was provided an advance copy (book hits Amazon.com on April 23rd, 2013) to review.
Many of you know I am an avid traveler. Often with my husband at my side, frequently with my friends along for the journey as well, and occasionally all on my own I set out for weekend adventures near and far across the globe. I generally log at least 120,000 miles on Delta Airlines each year flying to and from various destinations. With a love of travel and a love of reading I'm naturally drawn to the travel writing genre. And there are some stars (I'm looking at you Anthony Bourdain, Peter Mayle and Bill Bryson)and some fantastic articles, stories, collections, and novels that come out of this genre. Sadly, Matt's latest book is not one of them.
Overall, Matt Gross is a credible travel author and guide. He presents an experienced voice in his work for the New York Times and is highly respected in the genre. In The Turk who Loved Apples, Mr. Gross explains that much of his travel writing has been on spec and conforms to his buyers' formatting, structure, and content requirements yet there is a whole world of experiences and observations he's collected on his travels that have value for others and thus he has in mind to share them.
I've not read many of Matt's short form pieces but his long form as presented in this book suffers from a style that doesn't deliver suspense, a sense of intrigue, or strong characters to draw in the readers' emotions. When I read travel writing, I want adventure or deep emotional outpourings that I can identify with and Matt's text falls short. In the beginning of the book he details his start in travel writing and recounts his time in Asia & I found myself waiting for the story to pull me in. Disappointment set in as with each page my hopes were dashed a bit further that the material would ever become truly engaging. Finally (finally!), I reached a chapter within which Mr. Gross wrote eloquently about his relationship with his roommates, reflecting on the emotional connections between them and pulling me in to root for him (for him to succeed, for him to love and be loved, for him to enjoy his travels)for the first time. I perked up, satisfied that my patience in grinding through the earlier lackluster sections was now producing rewards.
And then Matt detailed his experience with a hooker and his feelings about the situation- both in the moment and afterward and here he lost me again and forever. Do you know how many travel books I've read in the past year where white, educated men from America have seen fit to detail their sex encounters with prostitutes overseas? Three. It's disgusting and shameful. I don't want to read about your post sex-trade enlightenment! I don't want to know about your crisis of consciousness (or lack thereof) and the good and the bad of what you did when confronted with the offer of cheap sex from a woman who thinks so little of herself or has so little to lose that she is selling her body. And I hate the idea that someone who writes about this is going to make revenue from selling his story. You buy a woman's dignity cheap and wholesale, then turn around and repackage it in a voyeuristic story for your audience, selling it to them for profit. If you've paid for sex, confess your sin to God, not your book audience.
I never did read about this Turk - the one who loved apples - because I couldn't make it past the wistful story of "that time I caved and bought sex".
The kindest I can be is that he needed a more judicious editor. The more I read I wonder at people with greater talents in both writing and travel not holding the position that the author had with the New York Times. Sounds like they got what they paid for with that gig.