I have conflicted feelings towards this book. There honestly was a good deal of true and good content but it really felt like it was lacking substantive depth.
The authors are trained in the CCEF model of biblical counselling which integrates counselling from the Bible + social sciences/modern therapy.
What I liked:
The authors spend the whole first half of the book explaining that our emotions are part of the imprint of being made in God’s image. They are targeting people who genuinely don’t understand how their emotions relate to God and their relationship with him. While that’s not a struggle I have, I can see the value and benefit that would bring to someone.
They called out one particular motivation for our lack of prayer to be lack of trust in God. We go to trusted friends for our problems, but won’t take them to God. This can indicate that we don’t understand God’s character well, don’t really know him and so we don’t fully trust him. There were multiple other scenarios of why we don’t go to God in prayer, but I thought that point was especially good.
What I disliked:
Sin not consistently being called what it is: Sin. One author, Alasdair, tells a story about a fight he and his wife had where he described his frustration being rooted in his desire to be the one in power or control. He then goes on to say “but that’s not helpful or beneficial for anyone.” And then moves on to the next point. I was kind of shocked that he didn’t explore it one step further to identify that his desire for power and control was rooted in sinful pride, arrogance and even, in that moment, likely disdain for his wife?? A related scenario happened a couple chapters later where they called vindictiveness and pettiness merely “unhealthy emotions”.
On a related note, the authors seem to completely omit the truth that our emotions are very often motivated and polluted by sin. “This book sets forth a holistic view of emotions rooted in the Bible.” Isn’t sin a pretty significant component of viewing our emotions biblically? For me, that omission makes this book a nearly critical failure.
Summary:
Sin is not *not* talked about in this book. But for me, the downplaying of sin against a holy God as mere “unhealthy” or “unhelpful” behaviours is significant enough to warrant a low rating from me. This book feels like it’s exercising the discernment of knowing right vs almost right; almost right can do a lot of damage.