Although I'm a declared not fan of beat poetry, I wanted to read some more of Ferlinghetti's poetry (yet Ferlinghetti did not consider himself to be a Beat poet, as he said in the 2013 documentary Ferlinghetti, Rebirth of Wonder: "Don't call me a Beat, I never was a Beat poet"). I must say I prefer Ferlinghetti over Ginsberg, and Ginsberg over Kerouac. I think the myth around these last two is not "literaturelly" justified, more so for Kerouac. As I said before, beat is not my cup of tea. I see it, as we say in Spanish, a lot of noise but few nuts. Having been twice to City Lights Bookstore, Ferlinghetti's library in San Francisco (where Ginsberg's Owl was published), I needed to read at least two of his books. I already read A Coney Island of the Mind, so what better than an anthology of Ferlinghetti's poems, especially this book being a present.
Much of Ferlinghetti's free verse attempts to capture the spontaneity and imaginative creativity of modern jazz. As I read in the preface for the Casimiro Parker edition of A Coney Island of the Mind, he was know for having frequently incorporated jazz accompaniments into public readings of his work.
With Ferlinghetti I do connect in some of the shorter poems. The longer poems might be alright if you listen to them, but not in the context of a page. It is just a set of examples with word and sound games within a broad topic without much depth, like in Baseball Canto or I am waiting. Some of the other poems have the high virtue of being good when reading and when listening. For me, a poem has to attemp to blend universality from the particular in all levels, like in Deep Chess. In its last verses, he talks about life as a momentum, either you want it or not, but not as an obligation. And more:
"And there's still time -
Your move"
Ferlinghetti's poetry is also characterized by its distinctive rhythm. His mastery of sound is evident throughout the collection, creating musicality from the sound of words and silences. He employs various prosodic techniques, including alliteration, assonance, and internal rhyme, to create a musical quality in his verse. He often employs a "ping-pong pattern" in his verse, creating a staggered, free-form typography that mirrors the content of his work. I think it is meant to help the reading of his poems, because it actually works with the emphasis that they require. This typographical experimentation serves not just an aesthetic purpose but also a functional one, guiding the reader's breath and attention. For example, in "In Goya's greatest scenes we seem to see", we read:
"We are the same people
only further from home"
Nevertheless, his rejection of traditional punctuation and capitalization, while innovative, can sometimes lead to ambiguity in interpretation. I also don't like about Ferlinghetti is the use of "and" in each other sentence as a connector. It makes me lose the wire, especially in the longer poems.
Ferlinghetti's background as a painter is evident in his poetry, with many of his of his works depicting scenes. His poems often read like verbal canvases, employing techniques such as ekphrasis and synesthesia to create rich, multisensory experiences for the reader. This painterly approach adds a unique dimension to his work, although sometimes he falls into the narrative hole of lyricism. In any case, his ability to transform everyday objects into experiences is particularly evident in poems like "The pennycandystore beyond the El":
"The pennycandystore beyond the El
is where I first
fell in love
with unreality
Jellybeans glowed in the semi-gloom
of that September afternoon"
Ferlinghetti's work is deeply rooted in social and political commentary, which sometimes gets a bit frivolous. His poems often serve as a critique of contemporary society, addressing issues such as environmental destruction, political corruption and the role of the artist in society. Other poems are just shallow words on ultra complex social phenomena, like White on White. While Ferlinghetti's work is generally strong, there are occasional moments where his political fervor overshadows his poetic craft. Some critics might argue that poems like Underwear, while entertaining, lack the depth and nuance of his more accomplished works.
I don't like the excessive culturalism in the way he conceives it. Of course poetry is born out of situations, but they sometimes feel like a burden to connect with the poem. If you don't know San Francisco, you lose a lot. And that is not fair.
In addition, he talks about love being sexually explicit, but in a good way. I don't see him taken about semen and breasts in a provocative or pornographic way, but as a down to earth approach to the topic. We have a great poem in "What could she say to the fantastic foolybear", where sperm is the result of sex which a seed of life (various interpretations) that birds, guardians of freedom for life, go to spread the word of the body:
"and birds went mad
and threw themselves from trees
to taste still hot upon the ground
the spilled sperm seed."
Other than the poems I already highlighted, I personally recommend:
- In Paris a loud dark winter
- Recipe for happiness in Khabarovsk or anyplace
- Two scavengers in a truck, two beautiful people in a Mercedes
- Roman morn
- Driving a cardboard automovile without a license
- O heart
- History of the airplane
- Pity the nation
- South of the border
Beat or not, Ferlinghetti is a great poet, especially for those skeptical with experimental poetry.