Deep Issues and Shallow Inconsistencies
In terms of enjoyment of the story, I give this story five stars. I felt like this easy-to-read story was packed with enough mystery and action to satisfy any upper elementary and middle school student. The author had a surprising amount of tough issues and concepts that his characters dealt with throughout the story: jealousy, friendship, home, abuse, evolution of relationships, loneliness, etc. I enjoyed his use of figurative language to create great imagery. So, why did I drop a star on my rating?
There was times where I felt like things were not consistent with explicit details. However, since these inconsistencies did not affect the overall telling of the story, most readers will be able to overlook them. For example, the parent’s restaurant is Amandine. This makes me think that the restaurant is French, but the text says that it is an Italian restaurant. However, the staff speaks Spanish at the restaurant, and I didn’t feel like we had an Italian dish until the end of the story.
Another detail that required me to overlook was the fact that Henry, Brook, and Lamont were seventh graders. While I felt like Lamont and Brook acted like seventh graders mostly, Henry usually felt older than his age due to thoughts. At first, I thought he was suppose to be some unlabeled genius, but then in an attempt to make him seem more his age, he often didn’t know vocabulary used by adults, so that kind of nixed the genius idea for me. He thought way more critically and analytically then any seventh grader that I have ever taught though.
Perhaps the conflict in how I perceive Henry is due to the third person narrator because the narrator’s descriptions show a lot of intelligence. Such as when describing how loud the air horn was in the classroom, the narrator compares the decibel levels to a rock concert.
In the end, readers can easily overlook these faults because, like previously stated, they do not affect the plot of the story, and for being as easy-to-read as it is, I was well pleased how the themes were presented. I think that contemporary authors fall into the trap of character types such as the idiotic or overbearing teacher/authority figure and allow main characters to display behaviors that are not constructive or healthy as cool. While the author did skirt along those character types with characters such as Mrs. Chu and the principal’s assistant, he balanced it out with a likable Ms. Davis and a empathetic Principal Pal. Also, Henry lies, gets angry, wants revenge (and even swears that he will get his revenge), but he often shows remorse and demonstrates that when you learn more about others, you can often find forgiveness and compassion for those who hurt you. And that, folks, is refreshing to see in a middle grade novel.