3.5 stars
I received a free digital edition from NetGalley in exchange for my honest review.
Lady Hardcastle and her maid/friend Florence Armstrong are looking forward to a quiet winter at home. They're hoping Lady H's friend "Fishy" will make them a new motorcar so they can gad about in the winter without freezing. Then Lady Hardcastle reads about a journalist was killed in a fire started by an arsonist and the suffragette bagged for the crime. Through a mutual friend, Lady Hardcastle is requested by Lady Bickle, a member of the Women's Social and Political Union, to investigate the crime and free her fellow suffragette Lizzie Worrel from gaol. Lady Hardcastle and Flo head off to Bristol and discover the crime goes much deeper than women's suffrage. They must join forces with Lady Bickle and an old nemesis, journalist Dinah Caudle, to figure out the truth and free Lizzie Worrel.
I have been eagerly anticipating this story since December. Women's suffrage is a favorite topic of mine and one I have studied extensively. I had a feeling my old friends Emily and Flo would want the right to vote. However, because the investigation takes them out of the neighborhood and into the city of Bristol, I feel the story loses some of the charm present in previous books. There are only two short scenes involving the Farley-Strouds and two short scenes with Daisy at the pub. I miss the local color and especially the Farley-Strouds. I did appreciate learning what happened to Clarissa after the events of the first book. I had been wondering about that, but for once the Farley-Strouds are not at the center of events in this book. The plot structure is more traditional and departs from the usual three-in-one structure. There are a couple of smaller mysteries that lead into the overall large mystery.
The mystery was OK but not what I expected. I was not really surprised by the revelations except for one at the very end. I was able to put the book down and sleep without wanting to pick it up again right away. After about the 2/3 mark was where it really got interesting and I wanted to finish it but was able to sleep without finishing. The denouement needed some more action. I kept thinking Lady Hardcastle was missing something. There was something else later in the novel I thought she should have looked into but didn't. I feel bad for thinking it but it could have answered some questions that arise at the very end of the novel. I really like the coded journal and had fun trying to figure it out. I am not as clever as Lady Hardcastle, alas, and couldn't crack the cipher.
Emily and Flo are, as always, delightful. They share less of their usual banter in this story but are still very close. Flo rolls her eyes whenever Emily forgets a name and Emily teases Flo about her lack of height. They really do act like sisters or even an old married couple. Emily acts like a scatterbrained old lady but she's much more sharp and aware than she lets on. Inspector Sunderland knows this and trusts her judgement. I appreciate that the detective is not an arrogant fool. Inspector Sunderland's hands are tied as the police believe this is a closed case. He's also on the trail of something else, unofficially. Since he is not able to investigate, this makes Lady Hardcastle's involvement more plausible and necessary.
The only other series regulars to appear are Daisy at the Dog and Duck, who has a subplot of her own and Dr. Simeon Gosling. Dr. Gosling is as jovial as ever and this time we get to see him interact with a male colleague and friend. He's a very jolly sort of man with a sense of humor. I like him because he appreciates his friend Emily's intelligence and accepts Flo as part of the package deal. Journalist Dinah Caudle may become a series regular as well. She got off on the wrong foot with Lady Hardcastle but now they are united in a common cause and must call a truce. Dinah can be tough because she's a woman in a man's world. She's trying to succeed in life outside of the expectations her family has for her and I admire her for that. She's more straightforward than Lady Hardcastle but she knows how to get answers in her own way. She also has more finesse when interrogating her suspects. I suspect she will become a friend and assist with future investigations.
The newcomers are connected with either the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) or the anti-women's suffrage league. While I do not approve of some of the tactics employed by the WSPU, their cause has my full sympathy. I know quite a lot about them so I skimmed some of the history presented in the story. Georgina, Lady Bickle, seems to be the head of the local Bristol branch of the WSPU. She's a champion of women's suffrage but not at the expense of human life and she knows Lizzie Worrel did not kill Christian Brookfield. Georgie is a younger version of Lady Hardcastle but I do not care for her as much. Georgie is a wealthy dilettante. Is she merely a bored housewife looking for something to do that's slightly mischievous or does she firmly believe in the cause? Her flippant manner rubs me the wrong way. Lady Hardcastle may be eccentric but she's better educated than Georgie and is more intelligent and serious than she looks. Perhaps Georgie will seem less silly when she's older? It is very nice to see her so devoted to her husband, though and not be a part of the usual society marriage.
Poor Lizzie Worrel is stuck in jail for a crime she claims she didn't commit. She is not doing well. I feel so awful for her. She doesn't have a prayer of a chance of getting out of jail alive. Lady Hardcastle, a stranger, is her only hope. It's no wonder Lizzie is despondent. The other two suffragettes who work in the office with Lizzie and Georgie are Marisol Rojas and Beattie Challenger. Marisol, a Chilean woman, is passionate and dedicated to the cause of freedom. I really like her. Beattie is a stereotypical spinster. She's quiet, nondescript and dedicated to the Empire. I object to the spinster stereotype. I don't like Beattie because of her jingoistic and snide comments to Marisol. Ladies, you're on the same side working for a common cause, don't be catty towards each other.
The suspects are Mr. Oswald Crane, a coffee importer who speaks out against women's suffrage and marital infidelity, blaming the woman. Unfortunately for him, his wife is conducting an affair and everyone knows it. He's a blustery, rude sort of man who thinks he's a big shot and can intimidate people but is really a buffoon and not taken seriously. Nathaniel Morefield, Mrs. Crane's lover, is actually a big shot. He's on the city council and naturally the ladies suspect him of corruption but how deep and what exactly is he involved in? Jimmy Stanbridge is a younger son of nobility and has a bad drinking and gambling problem. He comes across as quite foolish. Redvers Hinckley is a property developer and I think that speaks for itself. Which one is a killer? They each have motivation to protect their own interests from the nosy journalist who was about to expose corruption in the city of Bristol. Are you surprised these types are on the suspect list? I am not. If they were American it would be the same thing with ties to Tammany Hall. Obviously these good old boys are opposed to women's suffrage for the most ridiculous reasons. Their rationale for opposing women's suffrage makes me so angry. I could never be as polite as Lady Hardcastle. I would have given them a blistering lecture and flounced off!
The book works as a standalone but contains some small spoilers - more like hints- for previous books in the series. Lady Hardcastle reveals more of her real backstory and she is becoming more well-known because of her past exploits. There is one brief mention of an old enemy and I really wonder what the story is there! I am dying to read more books about Lady Hardcastle and find out what's going on with this enemy she thought was dead.
The author includes a historical note on the WSPU and other notes on the history of the places mentioned in the story.
Content includes a visit to a certain type of house frequented by men and a chat with a woman dressed ... unusually. She informs Lady Hardcastle and Flo that the man they are asking about had to leave on foot. You can connect the dots yourself with the information presented. I'd rather not and it just wasn't necessary.
Content also includes minor gun violence and arson.