The Dubious Tale of the Winter Wizard by Nick McNeil follows Bertly, the eponymous wizard, as he narrates his life story to his hapless apprentice, from attending a magical academy to potentially saving the world.
I thought overall this book was fine. Not great, not awful. There were several characters I enjoyed, especially the griffin Clia, and I liked the one-sided rivalry between Bertly and the only other human wizard, Polly. I thought the overall plot was fine, a little generic, but as the book takes a little bit of a comedic route, using these tropes in a deconstructive fashion is rather fun. I enjoyed elements of the world building as well. I also have to say the cover art is really excellent.
I struggled with understanding the exact genre of this book. I think the book is attempting to weave both comedy and epic fantasy together, but I don’t really feel like this ever comes together smoothly in the novel. It’s hard to really single out specific moments, but I really felt like I had whiplash when reading the book, where things would swing from light and comedic to grim. Maybe it’s all due to the first-person narration, where the plot is more in line with an epic fantasy, but the main character and his narration is absurd. Bertly himself is a rather reprehensible individual. Granted, he is 16 years old in the book when he is narrating it, so I can’t be too shocked at his self-absorption, self-aggrandizement and moments of stupidity. He is a hard character to really root for, and he himself unwittingly injects the comedy into the narration.
It makes me wonder why this book needs to be written as Bertly recounting the tale of his life up to a certain moment. In a sense this book is very akin to the Kingkiller Chronicles by Patrick Rothfuss. Both feature unreliable narrators who recount their life, a majority of which entail either attending a magical school or going on adventures. The reader understands in both of these works that the narrator is certainly shaping their life to be appealing and in the best possible light. This book acknowledges that in its very title, “The Dubious Tale”. I guess the only benefit the book reaps from its first-person retrospective narration I feel is the injection of comedy. Will a sequel to this book also be written in the same retrospective manner? At least for the Kingkiller Chronicles, the retrospective viewpoint helps give structure to the entire trilogy.
There are other things throughout the book I found inexplicable or irksome. For example, why is Bertly known as the Winter Wizard? When Bertly and company return to Stonebank, the populace greets him as the Winter Wizard, and while the characters have no idea who that is, Bertly just adopts it as his own title and runs with the nickname throughout the rest of the novel. I still don’t understand its significance, but it really feels out of nowhere and just shoehorned in. Another thing that irked me was Roderick and Bertly’s fight 3/4ths of the way through the novel, when Roderick confronted Bertly about his selfish actions in the past that nearly got the entire group of companions killed. Bertly’s response to Roderick, “Why are you just now blowing up about this?” (287) echoes my own thoughts, as a fight like this should have naturally occurred much earlier in the novel when this information was revealed to Roderick as he was writing Bertly’s story. This just felt like a moment that was shoed-in, and then hand waved away as a necessary part of the plot progression.
Overall, I give this book three out of five stars. While entertaining, I struggled with the book’s genre, and felt like its under commitment to either being a comedy or an epic fantasy undermined it. Certain plot points in the book felt forced, which were jarring for me to read. I hope that a sequel to this book finds its footing and focuses on character development, especially the narrator if it is also going to be a first-person retrospective tale.