Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong

Rate this book
The Zhongyong--translated here as Focusing the Familiar--has been regarded as a document of enormous wisdom for more than two millennia and is one of Confucianism's most sacred and seminal texts. It achieved truly canonical preeminence when it became one of the Four Books compiled and annotated by the Southern Song dynasty philosopher Zhu Xi (1130-1200). Within the compass of world literature, the influence of these books (Analects of Confucius, Great Learning, Zhongyong, and Mencius) on the Sinitic world of East Asia has been no less than the Bible and the Qu'ran on Western civilization.

With this new translation David Hall and Roger Ames provide a distinctly philosophical interpretation of the Zhongyong, remaining attentive to the semantic and conceptual nuances of the text to account for its central place within classical Chinese literature. They present the text in such a way as to provide Western philosophers and other intellectuals access to a set of interpretations and arguments that offer new insights into issues and concerns common to both Chinese and Western thinkers. In addition to the annotated translation, a glossary of terms gives in concise form important senses of the terms that play a key role in the argument of the Zhongyong. An appendix addresses some of the more technical issues relevant to the understanding of both the history of the text and the history of its English translations. Here the translators introduce readers to the best contemporary textual studies of the Zhongyong and make use of the most recent archaeological discoveries in China to place the work within its own intellectual context.

182 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2001

2 people are currently reading
55 people want to read

About the author

Roger T. Ames

74 books22 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
16 (51%)
4 stars
10 (32%)
3 stars
3 (9%)
2 stars
2 (6%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Christopher Porzenheim.
93 reviews51 followers
September 26, 2024
Of the four classic works of Confucianism, I found this one, the Zhongyong, the least interesting, because I am less interested in the metaphysical and cosmological speculation which takes up most of the philosophical focus in this work. The Zhongyong also references the Shijing even more frequently, and while the editors do a good job explaining why, that didn't inspire any more interest to me.

Really, instead of this, I'd rather reread the Analects or Mencius.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.