I have a stronger opinion about this one than is probably necessary. Something about it just kept me from enjoying it. I discovered that something when I went in search of the fact behind the fiction and discovered the majority of the book wasn't based on fact at all. The crux of the plot, Daniel seeking revenge on a French general who killed Boone's cousin, is complete fiction. Boone had no cousin named Ethan and there was no butcher-general Duvall at Fort Dusquene.To serve this plot Boone is depicted as a killing machine action hero which feels disingenuous to the real man. Abraham Lincoln fighting vampires works because of the absurdity, that's part of the fun, but here we have Boone scalping an Indian, slitting throats and mowing down people chapter after chapter. The liberties taken here just don't sit well with me. There's also the weird bit of the title, A River Run Red, but there's no river central to the plot. This would have been a great book if the main character had been inspired by and modeled after Boone, not written as him.