Heinous: Forgotten Murders of the 1910’s by Melina Druga was an interesting and sad read. I am not usually a reader of true crime, though I have read and watched my share of mysteries and police procedurals, but I found myself very interested as I read each case that was discussed in this book. Many of the crimes in this book sound like they could have been committed today, rather than more than a hundred years ago, the main differences being societal norms and expectations and the difference in technologies used to try to identify the perpetrators of crimes.
The book starts out talking about crime in general, the U.S government’s attempts to show off what were considered the nation’s best prisons at the time and the International Prison Conference, which was founded to address “how crime had become international and how costly it was to nations.” Their goal was to discuss crime and how to reduce it.
I was struck by the similarities in current anti-immigrant sentiment and those in a quote from an author at the time who said “.. ‘the immigrant evil’ is fast eating its insidious way to the very vitals of the country.” - as if most crime was committed by immigrants. Another thing that reminded me of somewhat current events, was the mention of the “moron problem”, moron then being a medical term for someone with the mental capacity of a child between the ages of 6 and 12, because mentally challenged individuals were among the police’s first suspects in many crimes - in the case of Janet Wilkinson, it was mentioned that the police wanted to keep a register of such people, so they could be “checked over”, partly because they believed that some of the crimes against children could have been prevented if something had been done about the mentally ill. It was also mentioned elsewhere that doing so would help the police know who to round up first. This sounds a lot like the talk around registering those with depression and mental illness so they can be flagged in the database if they decide they want to purchase a firearm - something which, now, many people would deem an invasion of privacy and a trampling of their rights as citizens of the United States.
After the introduction, Heinous is divided into two main sections - Case Closed and Who Got Away With Murder? Case Closed details a number of murders, the press and investigation surrounding them and the eventual capture and punishment of the culprit. Who Got Away With Murder?, does the same thing, except in this case there is often doubt present related to the evidence, the suspect(s), or both, leaving it up to the reader to decide if they feel the case was actually solved or if, perhaps, the wrong person was punished for the crime. There is a final Bonus Case at the end of the book which presents the evidence and the conjecture around one final death and asks readers to put on their own detective hats to see if they can determine what might have actually happened to the victim.
Overall, I really enjoyed reading this book. I found myself pulled into the mystery surrounding the various crimes and quite interested in finding out who had committed the murder(s). I also learned a few things about crime investigation from that era that I found fascinating. If you enjoy true crime, mysteries or vintage tales of either type, I think you’ll enjoy this book. I would also be interested to see if any true crime aficionados out there take the author up on her offer to discuss the final case on social media!