I looked at reviews from others out there and several seem to be better summaries of the good and of things that are peeves of some people. I will write about what I liked in the book.
The writer is Scottish and setting is in the UK and the book was published in 1989 so it has a nice ‘different’ feel to me. Some attitudes or references of women probably are not PC by today’s standards. There is a dash of adultery in the book and the way the husband reacted I thought had a 1970’s feel to it. The main character in the book breeds and trains hunting dogs, and hunting can be a trigger for some people nowadays. I liked the specifics of the mystery but agree with others the ending felt a bit rushed. Now that I have those details out of the way, I can talk about aspects of the book that I would like to talk about.
In the author’s note before the book starts, G.H. writes ‘My own fancy is for Labradors, but Labs are too predictable for such a story as this.’ So he turns it over to spaniels. Then in the book, there is some fun sparring between a Lab breeder and the main character of the book, John Cunningham, a Falklands war veteran, who chooses to open a breeding and training kennel for Springer Spaniels. (I seriously thought of getting a Springer but glad my wife steered me to a cockapoo.) I have enjoyed sparring over the merits of other hunting breeds in other books, most recently between setters and pointers, and the argument often is good fun to me. Here is a couple of excerpts from this book:
Joe showed me his neat kennels and his complement of Labradors, and I met Mr and Mrs Fettle, the elderly couple who looked after the daily management. Joe seemed to have plenty of time to spare. ‘But,’ he said with a sideways glance, ‘you can fully train a Labrador while a spaniel’s still scratching itself.’ He was waiting for me to point out that the Labrador, being a retriever and therefore expected to do no more than wait beside his master until there was quarry to be fetched, had little to learn beyond what a puppy did naturally, while a spaniel had to hunt without chasing, distinguish wounded game from that which was sitting tight and resist the constant temptation to chase. There was even a vestige of truth in what he said. Because of their eagerness and sheer joie de vivre, spaniels can be hard work.
And in another passage, there is:
Joe said. ‘He could certainly do the training if you could look after the rest. It’s my experience that you can teach a puppy the rudiments of retrieving without getting out of your armchair.’
‘Training a spaniel to quest without chasing takes a little more application,’ Mrs Kitts said severely. ‘You’re a lazy devil, Joe. I think that that’s why you stick to Labradors.’
Joe laughed and nearly choked on his food. ‘Anybody who chooses to work with spaniels,’ he said, wiping his eyes, ‘would make love standing up in a hammock, just to make life difficult.’
And another from someone who has had to much to drink:
For a moment his voice stilled the hubbub in the room. Dogs can arouse grander passions then love. ‘A retriever’s s’posed to retrieve what’s shot yes? ‘Sall right for you. Spaniels only have to rampage around the bushes, scaring out anything that’s stupid enough to pay attention to them. They can’t retrieve worth a damn anyway.’
The idea of having a kennel on a good sized property is appealing so it is fun to feel a part of that. I don’t like the thought of leaving dogs alone in kennels though and I know it would be a ton of work as this excerpt refers to:
‘There’s no such word as “finish” in the vocabulary of a working kennel,’ I said. ‘By then, it’ll be feeding time. It’s always feeding time or cleaning-out time or walking time.’
‘Or singing them to sleep time?’
‘Now you’re getting it.’ I said.
I also enjoyed the scuffling in the book over the topic of working dogs and show dogs with the attitude of the main character (and probably the author) reflected in this part:
'As I told the Sergeant, I never sold my pups to non-shooting homes. It would have been like selling a favourite daughter into a harem. A dog is happiest doing what it is bred for, and very few breeds were intended to be pets.'
In the book there is talk about guns and adaptors forced on them because of the strict gun laws in the UK. I learned there is a rifled adaptor tube you can put into a shotgun to fire two-two rifle cartridges or blanks out of it.
As far as the mystery goes, I almost never figure them out on my own. This one seemed plausible when things are explained to me in the end. I would be interested if the ‘true’ mystery book fans are able to figure it out before told in the end. I know that some of those ‘true’ mystery book fans would find too much space is taken up in this book about kennels and training, but as I am a ‘mystery + dog’ book fan, I loved all those type of details.
I would really like to read more in this series, but my first goal is to eventually read book 1 of all the ‘mystery + dog’ series. So far, I have only read book 1 of about 12 of the 44 ‘mystery + dog’ book series I have identified. In my quest to find the ‘best’ dog books, I am still on the hunt for the best ‘mystery + dog’ books and would love to hear from others on their vote in this category.
To finish up this review I would say I enjoyed the book and would recommend it.