Do you know how you end up with ‘friends’ on Facebook that you basically don’t know? Or that you did know, but that was when you were 15 and you only agreed to 'connect' with them on the basis that there won’t actually be all that much ‘connecting’? Well, you may also have noticed that over this summer (2019-20) in Australia we’ve had the occasional bushfire. Many of the people I’m friends with are basically what Australia’s Deputy PM recently referred to as “pure, enlightened and woke capital-city greenies” - this, of course, was meant as an insult. Many of his supporters are the opposite of this, I guess that makes them “polluted, benighted and asleep environmental vandals”. These people have been particularly rabid recently in denouncing any and all claims of said woke greenies. One of my ‘friends’ posted a list of these benighted ones and also supplied their highest level of education beside a list of their anti-climate change claims. One of these is an Australian back bencher called Craig Kelly (MP), who recently made a name for himself by being told off on British TV and afterwards referred to the meteorologist, physicist and god knows what other qualifications she has who called him a climate change denier, that she was an ‘ignorant Pommie weather-girl’ – Pommie being Australian slang for English person (apparently, Pommy - short for pomegranate - is rhyming slang for immigrant - perhaps if you say it very fast, while eating pomegranate seeds, maybe...). This, naturally enough, had people running to see what his qualifications were (hence the list my ‘friend’ posted). It turns out that prior to his being the Right Honourable, Mr Kelly sold furniture and had only graduated from high school. The list is a who’s who of Australian climate change deniers – well, 7 of them anyway – and of those one left school in year 10, four in Year 12 and two have an undergraduate degree, one in Arts and one in Advertising. The point, I guess, that we are supposed to take from all this is that non-experts should shut up.
I wrote this under my 'friend's' post: "Most of the Einsatzgruppen commanders were professionals; 15 of the 25 leaders had PhDs. I worry about posts like this - I work with people with much higher qualifications than any of these people - but I'm not sure paper can erase stupidity, no matter what pretty words are written on it. I worry posts like this might be used to silence people like my parents who have less education than any of the people on the list above.”
It is too easy to assume that intelligence is something that is both taught in schools and measurable by the length of time one has spent in school. I’m certainly not saying that there are no benefits from education – quite the opposite, in some ways I think it is about our only hope – but the real mistake is to assume that education is enough to ‘fix’ things. It is important to remember that education often reinforces the prejudices of a given society – that education is, in some senses, indoctrination. It shouldn’t be – it should teach critical thinking – but too often it teaches received wisdom. Worse than this, it convinces those who receive an education that they not only deserved it on the basis of their intellectual merit, but also that those with lesser qualifications are also lesser in the sense of their ability to reason – that is, merit has shown that the educated are the same group as the intelligent.
I’m not even going to begin discussing why you might want to start off here by defining ‘intelligence’ – this book covers many of the problems with that more than adequately. Rather, I want to chat about the ‘trap’ part of the title. In a lot of ways this book is a rehash of stuff which is perhaps better covered in books like Mistakes Were Made (But not by me) or Sway – there were endless books of this kind printed about a decade ago, and I would still recommend most of them. The ‘trap’ part of this is the bit where we use our intelligence to work against what might otherwise be our better judgement. The examples given in the book include lots of scientists who become convinced of some crazy nonsense about HIV-AIDS or vaccinations or alien abductions – and then, once they are so convinced, no amount of evidence is enough to convince them otherwise. The point made here is that their intelligence is actually a large part of the problem. They actually use their superior reasoning skills to find increasingly ingenious reasons to explain why the holocaust never happened, say, or why 9/11 was a false flag / inside job, or why climate change is a huge conspiracy of scientists seeking additional research funding.
He then presents a number of ways that you might go about tripping yourself up so as not to fall into the intelligence trap. Mostly, these are things from the books I’ve mentioned earlier – well, and also mostly Thinking: Fast and Slow.
Overall, this book was fine – and certainly worth reading if you have not read any of the books I’ve mentioned above, although, I would probably recommend Thinking: Fast and Slow over this, and perhaps any of the others too, now I think about it – but that might just be because I read those first, if you know what I mean. In fact, the book I would really recommend on this topic is The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making – it contains all the stuff you need to learn with none of the crappy case study examples of people being idiots - often in aeroplanes, for some reason.
I’m going to have to end with one criticism – the author spends quite a lot of time quoting Michael Shermer as one of the great examples of rational thought triumphing over prejudice and ignorance. I once started his The Mind of the Market – I admit that I’m a crazy, left wing, and maybe even woke sort of guy, but I found Shermer’s radical free market views quite hard to take, so much so that I don't think I ever finished the book, and certainly didn't review it. It certainly did not appear to me at the time as the pinnacle of sceptical analysis - and I suspect the GFC might have provided room for some skeptical reappraisal on Michael's behalf. No, actually, I very much doubt that. I generally shudder when people say there is one truth and they have special access to that truth. I’m not sure the world really works that way. And in part, that ought to be the lesson of this book.