"Under Nushagak" Bluff was one of my book discussion choices for this year, and there was much to talk about. The story takes place in Alaska during the early-mid 20th century, before Alaska became a part of United States. The encounters between the Yup'ik community, the cannery men (many of whom came from the East, specifically China and the Philippines), fishermen and pilots (many of whom were European), as well as the missionaries (European and American men and women) created a atmosphere of melancholy, tension, and few moments of comradery. I learned a lot about indigenous ways of the life in the region, such as how skiffs, ropes, and fishing nets were used to catch salmon, how the salmon was prepared and cooked, and other cultural practices, such as the use of bathhouses. There was an consistent element of comparison between the communities, not without jealousies and prejudices, including the problem of religious conversion. At the worst times depressing, and at the best, poignant, Heavener's characters made the narrative completely worthwhile. Learning about mothers and daughters, fathers and daughters, preachers, homemakers, rapid industry and factory men, the imminence of death (to the people and animals), and the ever present folkloric yearning for social clarity and meaningfulness, helped me gain perspective on a time and place I didn't know about prior to finding and reading "Under Nushagak Bluff". My favorite parts illuminated the indigenous practices of gathering food and supplies from the land: fishing for salmon (learning how salmon begin to decay after they shed their skin), collecting berries from dry, wind-strewn fields, finding fireweed, and gathering wood for fires. In those moments, which take up a lot of the book, enchantment and wonder in the natural world (the water, the sun, the frost, the smell of flora) was rekindled and urged me to finish the entire story even though the end seemed to complete a social cycle in crisis that didn't leave much room for brighter future. I worry about places of filth, such as the Cannery (where dirty men smelling of rotten fish and metal and blood had to work in bad conditions and then sleep in disheveled bunkers) continuing an industry without a real philosophical intention and foundation other than the production of money. Because of this, and not because of the value this precious book holds, is part of why I am unable to takeaway something inspiring about the situation presented. However, for anyone interested in the history of Alaska, the plight of the indigenous people (especially women), and the fraught emergence of industry and labor (especially concerning men), I highly recommend.