Mojo -
Mojo presents us with two extremely different characters, both extremely poignant and very real representations of how the pain and struggle of that era would inform your decisions and the mindset you’d develop.
In Irene we get someone who lives in the past and doesn’t accept the future will be any better. She has arrived in the present BECAUSE of what’s happened to her.
In Teddy we get someone who lives in the future and doesn’t accept the past, not letting it define him. He has arrived in the present IN-SPITE of what has happened to him.
I think the best example would be illustrated in a story shared between the two.
Irene takes out some dice and explains that there is a major difference between how Africa and America view them. Whereas Africans would use them for ‘Throwing bones’ (to read fortunes and empower people/add to their lives); Americans would use them for ‘Shooting craps’ (to waste money and take away from their lives)
The polarisation of these two characters ‘guiding principles’ is wonderful to watch as they interact with each other throughout the play.
Something I also love about Alice Childress is how she allows us to look through the world from the character's POV. Prompted by Irene, after learning of a cancer diagnosis, she says that:
“Much as I’ve been through in life, this ain’t nothing worse’;
Truly, this was a sobering dose of reality as we’re reminded that for as omnipotent as slavery and discrimination were, on top of that people still had to deal with the various struggles of life; cancer diagnoses, toothaches, breakups, so for Irene to see a cancer diagnosis as something to just ‘take in her stride’, really speaks to the hardship and pain black people of their era had to endure. This is reinforced when she later talks about not wanting to feel ‘chicken-hearted’ which illustrates that for black people in that era, fear and sadness simply weren’t beneficial to express, because the only goal daily was to survive, and showing emotions wasn’t an effective way of doing so.
String:
Preamble, my guilty pleasure is when a play, book, or film justifies the title by introducing something that explains it, that aside.
String felt like a new angle by Alice Childress, although sticking with the same ‘umbrella type’ of characters (Black people of varying social standings), she explores this story in an almost murder mystery-esque context.
String was highly interactive, having you question each character's motives and, at times, making you want to physically enter the scene just to shake some sense into a character (just tell the truth Joe!)
Even though the outcome was expected, we all knew Joe would find the wallet one way or another, it didn’t feel like a disappointing resolution or an anti-climatic moment - it actually made you more invested as you tried to figure out how this would happen and how they’d react (very much like the movie 12 angry men, you know it has to get resolved.. but it’s the how’s that’s interesting)