Duševná slepota - nevidieť do mysle

by Simon Baron-Cohen, Richard Cedzo (Translator)

Hoci je veľa kníh o autizme, práca Simona Barona-Cohena Duševná slepota – nevidieť do mysle patrí k najpopulárnejším a najdôležitejším.

Baron-Cohen jasne píše, že to, čo naša myseľ vidí ako realitu, nie je v skutočnosti realita, ale výstup obrovského množstva špecializovaných neurónových spoluprocesov, ktoré interpretujú realitu skresleným spôsobom.

Podobne, ako vnímame farbu, vnímame aj úsmev druhej osoby a ďalšie sociálne javy. Obývame totiž mentálne svety. Duševná slepota – nevidieť do mysle je mimoriadne prínosná nielen pre tých, ktorí sa s problémom autizmu stretli a sú nútení sa s ním vysporiadať, či pre tých, čo pracujú s autistami, ale aj pre filozofov a sociálnych vedcov, ktorí sa zaoberajú problémami humánnej komunikácie a sociálnej inteligencie.
Kniha je napísaná mimoriadne zrozumiteľným a prístupným jazykom, bola preložená do mnohých jazykov a našla si obrovské množstvo čitateľov aj medzi laickou verejnosťou.

Genres: Psychology, Science, Autistic Spectrum Disorder, Nonfiction, Neuroscience, Brain, Mental Health

152 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1995

About the author

Simon Baron-Cohen FBA is Professor of Developmental psychopathology at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. He is the Director of the University's Autism Research Centre, and a Fellow of Trinity College. He has worked on autism, including the theory that autism involves degrees of mind-blindness (or delays in the development of theory of mind) and his later theory that autism is an extreme form of what he calls the "male brain", which involved a re-conceptualisation of typical psychological sex differences in terms of empathising-systemising theory.

Reviews

[Marisa · Rating 3 out of 5]

It's about autism. Mr Baron-Cohen is one of those "I'm going to think hard about how the brain must work from a few psychology experiments" guys. In this case, though, at least he did a bunch of such experiments himself. The book is designed to be readable for those without specialized knowledge of the field but is still interesting to someone, like me, who has moderate background in neuroscience. Essentially, he proposes a set of neural mechanisms which would suffice to explain how people develop and maintain representations of the mental states of others, and how he thinks specific deficits in those mechanisms explain autism. The weak link here is how all that relates to the actual brain, but likely the parsing of mentalization into specific mechanisms is needed before we can get anywhere with how the brain actually does it.

[Jane Lebak · Rating 4 out of 5]

A *lot* to think about in this book. Baron-Cohen handles the development of human beings' perception of self in relation to other selves and then analyzes what's different in individuals with autism. This wasn't quite the book I expected (when I see "essay" I think "introspective ramblings" not "heavily footnoted scientific paper you'll have to read in total silence in order to comprehend") but it was really good and challenging in many ways.

I got about a page into the introduction and then skipped the rest because it rapidly got incomprehensible, but the essay itself is eminently readable by non-academics.

[The Angry Lawn Gnome · Rating 3 out of 5]

I'm not prepared to review this one, in all honesty. Too close to the issue, perhaps? A bit overwhelmed by the terminology? Dunno. Maybe someday.

However, the only passage I want to note for myself (and found a bit startling, candidly) was the section on pp. 94-95 of the edition I read relating that it is no longer in dispute that autism is a form of brain damage, simply that the area or areas damaged have not yet quite been nailed down. If Baron-Cohen has stated similar ideas elsewhere, I've missed them. And if the exact area or areas have been found, I've not heard of that, either.

[Joshua Dewald · Rating 5 out of 5]

Quick and fascinating overview of Baron-Cohen's take on "mindblindness" in those with autism (and variations of that), including discussion of supporting research. Very curious what current of research is as the "essay" is 25 years old now.

[Ally · Rating 4 out of 5]

I think I finally 'get' Theory of Mind now. A good introduction, comprehensive and accessible. Good for anyone interested in autism or social cognition in general

[Sandee Clemons · Rating 1 out of 5]

I have read this book and I found it very hard to understand. I am aware that people on the autism spectrum do have trouble with mind blindness, but this book could have been written without all the *BIG* words that make it too hard to understand!

[Jeremy]

A fair amount of data about autism is gone over but the author overstates the extent to which it supports the details of his view. The overall picture seems right.

[Robert Stojnic · Rating 2 out of 5]

The book is more about Baron-Cohens theory of the mind, which he himself described as "not very convincing" than autism.

[Kayla · Rating 5 out of 5]

This was great! I can't wait to read all of his work!

[Deniz · Rating 5 out of 5]

Simon Baron-Cohen’s Mindblindness is a landmark contribution to the cognitive neuroscience of social understanding. By developing and defending a model of mindreading rooted in modular cognitive architecture, Baron-Cohen provides a robust theoretical framework for understanding both typical and atypical social cognition, with a particular focus on autism.

First of all, to begin with the structure of the text. The book unfolds across eight chapters, gradually constructing a theory of the “mindreading system,” comprising four cognitive mechanisms: Intentionality Detector (ID), Eye-Direction Detector (EDD), Shared Attention Mechanism (SAM), and Theory of Mind Mechanism (ToMM). These components are examined through evolutionary, cognitive, developmental, clinical and comparative lenses. Each chapter respectively scaffolds understanding toward a central thesis: autism is primarily a deficit of the mindreading system, or what Baron-Cohen terms “mindblindness.”

Second, Baron-Cohen also scopes modular architecture of social cognition. His modular model provides a powerful explanation of how humans decode others’ mental states. His division of the system into EDD, ID, SAM, and ToMM is conceptually elegant and empirically grounded. Next, developmental and comparative insights reside in a big point on the text. The discussion of eye-direction detection across species (Chapter 7) and the developmental trajectory of mindreading in infants (Chapter 6) offers a nuanced perspective. The model’s alignment with evolutionary continuity is particularly compelling, bridging human and non-human social behavior. Furthermore, Baron-Cohen also stressed clinical application to autism.
The core of the book, the “mindblindness” hypothesis, is one of the most influential ideas in autism research. The link between SAM and early autism detection, and the diagnostic potential of joint attention failures, is one of the most promising translational aspects of the theory.

Cognitive sciences make a consensus in philosophical and interdisciplinary range.The final chapter critically engages with ongoing controversies—from the role of first-person experience and language in theory of mind, to competing models (i.e., Alan Leslie, Premack etc.) and the importance of empathy. Baron-Cohen does not shy away from complexity, and presents each debate with admirable clarity.

Points for Critical Reflection
Modularity and Its Limits: While the Jerry Fodorian sense modular approach is persuasive, the evidence for sharp boundaries between components (especially ToMM and SAM) remains tentative. More neurobiological support and cross-linguistic validation would strengthen the claims.

Emotion and Social Context: The book openly acknowledges that the proposed system focuses on cognition more than affections. A more integrated treatment of emotional empathy, affective forecasting, and context-dependence in social cognition would round out the model. Henceforth, future models must address emotional-based (especially emotion-cognition interaction) and context-related sensitivity more robustly.

Variability within Autism: Baron-Cohen addresses autism subtypes late in the book. While this section is valuable, a more sustained engagement with autistic heterogeneity (including gender, executive function, and central coherence) would benefit the overall argument.

To summarize all, Mindblindness is a foundational and forward-looking work. It not only transforms how we conceptualize autism but also reframes core aspects of human social intelligence. Baron-Cohen’s theory is bold in scope, rigorous in structure, and deeply humane in its implications—particularly in its call for early diagnosis and intervention. Whether one fully agrees with the modular claims or not, this book is essential reading for anyone interested in cognitive sciences, developmental psychology, cognitive neuroscience, autism research, or the philosophy of mind. Its interdisciplinary approach ensures that it will continue to inspire research, debate, and applied innovation for years to come.

[David Ward · Rating 3 out of 5]

Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind by Simon Baron-Cohen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1995) (616.8982) (3936).

I picked up Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind by Simon Baron-Cohen solely because author and professor Dr. Temple Grandin commended this in her 2023 book Autism and Education: The Way I See It: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know by Temple Grandin (Future Horizons 2023). Temple Grandin is autistic, so her insight is particularly meaningful.

Simon Baron-Cohen argues in Mindblindness that natural selection in the context of evolutionary psychology has caused the human brain (like any other organ) to evolve specific cognitive mechanisms to solve particular adaptive problems. The evolutionary goal/purpose is to allow humans to “rapidly comprehend and predict another organism’s behavior.” An essential requirement is eye contact and the closely-associated ability to follow another’s gaze to discern what the other individual is viewing. This gives the observer a clear advantage in understanding, predicting, and manipulating the behavior of others in the group (including those in primate groups - like humans, for instance). This ability is a critical form of “social intelligence.” It is important to understand this, for an organism’s level of social intelligence determines the member’s status within their group.

The author refers to this ability as a form of “mind reading,” and he refers to its absence as “mindblindness.” That is precisely the point. Individuals with autism share this deficit and are thus by the author’s definition mindblind.

The author notes that mindblindness can be overcome. This book’s last section highlights Temple Grandin as an autist who has learned to successfully cope with her neuropsychological deficits in the big world.

The author must be on to something. If Temple Grandin agrees with his views, that’s truth enough for this reader.

My rating: 7/10, finished 4/28/24 (3936).

[Jeremiah · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a good source of information from the perspective of cognitive and evolutionary psychology. I am using this as part of my research for a paper on Autistic biblical interpretation and Theory of Mind is actually a large portion of my argument.

There are some things in this book I found problematic, though I was not surprised by them. An academic clinician would be inclined to use person-first language (person with autism) rather than identity first (autistic person). Some of the information is outdated, i.e., the author states autism is more prevalent in males than females.

I did get a decent amount of information on Theory of Mind and how it affects Autistic people. So, I got what I paid for.

[Laxmi]

Having read about the condition of mindblindness, which autistic individuals suffer from, made me want to understand more about it. This book reaches down to the root cause of mindblindness, which includes functions in our brain and our ocular behavior right from the time we are born. It gets quite technical at times, but could be an interesting read if one is interested in understanding how some parts in our brain function and how lack of this functioning affects individuals.

[Jukka Häkkinen · Rating 3 out of 5]

Baron-Cohen kuvailee mielen teorian vaikutusta sosiaalisen todellisuuden tulkintaan ja soveltaa tätä autismin kirjon ajattelun ymmärtämiseen. Mielen teorian ja taustalla oleva evoluutiopsykologinen ajattelu on selkeää, mutta osa teoretisoinneista on monimutkaisesti ilmaistu ja vaatii taustatietoja. Kirjan iästä johtuen viitteet ovat osin sen verran vanhoja, että mielellään tarkastaisi, ovatko vielä nykytiedon valossa valideja tuloksia.

[Jade Thomson · Rating 4 out of 5]

Used it for my bachelor and master thesis, ferry interesting.

[Kathy Dyer · Rating 3 out of 5]

technical, dense and thought-provoking

[Nicholas B · Rating 5 out of 5]

Unexpectedly a perfect followup to Pinker's Language Instinct, which I just finished

[Nina · Rating 3 out of 5]

scorrevole, non amo particolarmente i libri che presentano la teoria di un unico autore piuttosto che un punto della situazione sul tema. teoria comunque interessante e ancora validata.

[Michelle Stanley · Rating 2 out of 5]

This was dry and boring

[A. B. · Rating 3 out of 5]

Basic account of the theory theory theory of mind.