Despite the promise of Mendel’s discoveries, autism was not playing by the rules. There were no autistic mothers or fathers filling the asylums or mental institutions across the United States or Austria, eugenic fugitives from sterilization programs meant to prevent their having any offspring. There were only the children, and no one had a clue as to why.
Forrest Maready's most recent book, The Autism Vaccine, is a fascinating look at the history of aluminum use in pediatric vaccines and the parallel rise in autism diagnoses. Focusing on two individuals--Donald Triplett and Émilie Dionne (of the Dionne quintuplets), Maready paints a fascinating picture of the rise of one of today's most confounding conditions, making the case that most of the autism we're seeing today is the result of damage to a specific part of the brain.
Heavily referenced with footnotes and relevant studies, the book covers the history of aluminum use in the diphtheria vaccine, the mechanism by which aluminum may play a role in toxic brain injury, and the current aluminum-laden vaccine schedule (and how it came to be that way), as well as autism-specific information regarding possible triggers for the condition (immune-system signalling from the brain during trauma and maternal immune activation) and fascinating facts about symmetry in the brain and lymphatic systems which might explain how and why autism happens in certain cases (and how the type of autism may differ based on the location of injury).
As with the other books I've read by the author, I did notice quite a bit of speculation on his part. However, he clearly states when the information he's presenting is simply a hypothesis. The facts are likewise clearly stated, with sources.
The unfortunate title was likely chosen to grab attention. It has certainly done so, as evidenced by the petition that sprang up when the book was merely announced, calling on Amazon to ban it from their catalogue. Obviously, the petition didn't work, and people still have a chance to read this fascinating book for themselves. It's my hope that people will read it and open their minds about this subject. It's one thing to want to protect children from infectious diseases. But we need to be careful that we aren't harming them in other ways in trying to achieve that goal. As Maready points out, even those with the best of intentions can cause harm. Continuing to turn away from the research about aluminum because its conclusions scare us isn't the way to help public health; only by having a transparent, honest discussion about risks (true risks, not ones fed to the public to ensure financial stability for a mega-industry) are we ever going to regain the health that children deserve. Startlingly, as Maready points out, it could take generations due to the damage that's already been caused.
But we have to start somewhere.