Military history as told through the lives and deeds of warfare's most famous commanders, from ancient Greece through the World Wars, VietNam, and the end of the twentieth century
Beginning with Leonides of Sparta, who died at Thermopylae in 480 b.c.e., and ending with General Giap, a Vietnamese leader; Moshe Dayan, commander of the Israeli Defense Force during the 1967 Six-Day War; and Colin Powell, Military Commanders provides an informative overview of the careers and battles of one hundred military commanders and their places in history. Divided by eras, the material covers the ancient world, the Anglo-Saxons and the Vikings, the Middle Ages, the Napoleonic period, the American War of Independence and the Civil War, the two World Wars, and the postwar conflicts.
Each entry provides a chronology of major events as well as a summary of achievements. The entries, both fascinating and easy to read, succeed in providing a clear yet nuanced picture of the role of the individual in historical events.
An engaging and thought-provoking book, full of facts, pertinent quotations, and anecdotes, Military Commanders is sure to prove of interest to a wide range of readers.
Nigel Cawthorne has a degree from University College, London. He has written, contributed to, and edited more than sixty books including, Fighting Them on the D-Day, 6 June 1944 ; T urning the Decisive Battles of the Second World War ; and The Encyclopedia of World Terrorism . His work has appeared in over one hundred and fifty newspapers and magazines on both sides of the Atlantic.
Military history as told through the lives and deeds of warfare's most famous commanders, from ancient Greece through the World Wars, VietNam, and the end of the twentieth century
Beginning with Leonides of Sparta, who died at Thermopylae in 480 b.c.e., and ending with General Giap, a Vietnamese leader; Moshe Dayan, commander of the Israeli Defense Force during the 1967 Six-Day War; and Colin Powell, Military Commanders provides an informative overview of the careers and battles of one hundred military commanders and their places in history. Divided by eras, the material covers the ancient world, the Anglo-Saxons and the Vikings, the Middle Ages, the Napoleonic period, the American War of Independence and the Civil War, the two World Wars, and the postwar conflicts.
Each entry provides a chronology of major events as well as a summary of achievements. The entries, both fascinating and easy to read, succeed in providing a clear yet nuanced picture of the role of the individual in historical events.
An engaging and thought-provoking book, full of facts, pertinent quotations, and anecdotes, Military Commanders is sure to prove of interest to a wide range of readers.
Nigel Cawthorne is an Anglo-American writer of fiction and non-fiction, and an editor. He has written more than 80 books on a wide range of subjects and has contributed to The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph Daily Mail and The New York Times. He has appeared on television and BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
Many of Nigel Cawthorne's books are compilations of popular history, without footnotes, references or bibliographies. His own web site refers to a description of his home as a "book-writing factory" and says, "More than half my books were commissioned by publishers and packagers for a flat fee or for a for a reduced royalty".
One of his most notable works was Taking Back My Name, an autobiography of Ike Turner, with whom he spent a number of weeks working with him on, taking up residence in Turner's house. The book caused much controversy, resulting in court cases for three years following its release.
Cawthorne currently lives in Bloomsbury, London with his girlfriend and son, Colin (born 1982).
As a military historian, I have engaged in many conversations that discussed the greatest military commanders in history [1] and read more than my fair share about such matters as well. This book consists of about 200 pages of the author's contribution to that debate, which makes for an entertaining sort of water cooler discussion among fellow military historians of the armchair variety, but often leads to a lot of wacky and idiosyncratic choices that make about as much sense as Kanye's claims to be the greatest artist of his generation on Twitter. Given the many ways that a military leader can excel in warfare: grand strategy, operations, tactics, logistics, diplomacy, motivational leadership, and so on, and given the large number of obscure but noteworthy military leaders who are worthy of recognition over the long course of human military history, to believe that one can definitively give any list of 100 generals is an act of great hubris. Thankfully, it is an act of hubris that is generally better for entertainment and debate on either a scholarly or a popular level, rather than making up the elements of a Greek tragedy. This book is aimed at a popular audience who may not be aware of the many generals and military traditions that the author leaves off, and impressed at some of the obscure names that the author has chosen that many would leave off of their own non-definitive lists.
Rather than spend much more time ragging on the author's questionable choices for the list in vague terms, I would like to comment on some of the ways this book could have been made better. For one, the book appears to suffer from a major case of presentism, choosing far too many leaders from World War II, while also choosing far too many British leaders of dubious skill [2]. Whole massive military traditions are left off--no great biblical military leaders like Joshua or David are included, nor Judas Maccabeus, while China during the Warring States period is represented only by military thinker Sun Tzu, and no one from the Three Kingdoms or early T'ang period. Likewise, there are no early Arab or Turk leaders, nor any of the great Byznantine emperors from the Macedonian dynasty, or Russians from the late 1700's and early 1800's, or Winfield Scott or Taylor, both of whom were way better generals than, to pick a name at random, Prince Rupert or Bonnie Prince Charlie. There are no fierce conquistadors on the list either, all of whom were pretty ruthless military leaders of astounding skill, nor any Japanese generals from the Sengoku period, like Oda Nobunga or Tokogowa Ieyseu, to give two examples. One suspects that this list was chosen with a goal of showing appreciation to various foreign cultures while also being chosen on the basis of familiarity to a British (and a lesser extent American) military history audience, with some unfamiliar names, but plenty of familiar names from familiar conflicts, some chosen with an apparent desire for balance on both sides of contentious conflicts (the English or American Civil Wars, for example).
Aside from the choices of its generals, which is certainly of a kind to stir up debate among the book's readers, whoever they are, this is a book that is not long enough to be definitive guide, although it provides enough information to familiarize a casual reader of history with the people that the author considers to be notable leaders, even if they lost most of their battles or ended up having inglorious ends because of treachery or, as was the case with at least one leader, from cirrhosis of the liver aggravated by a sexually transmitted disease. Each of the 100 generals or military thinkers chosen is named, with their (probable or definite) birth and death years shown, a chronology of their life, a picture, a summary of their most notable military activities, and an inset that gives their career highlights, including their most famous battles. On the top right page of each name there is a quote by or about that particular leader, making this a well-organized and skillfully researched book, capable of provoking many debates among military historians of a popular variety about the leaders that were included and left out, similar to the way that the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame serves as a similar subject of debate among music fans with the same concerns about greatness and influence. This is a book to stir the pot, and at just over 200 pages, it will likely do so very skillfully and efficiently, likely encouraging interested readers in further and more in-depth study.
[2] Here is the list of the author's top 100. Where a particular choice deserves credit for bringing an obscure leader to wider attention, I will mark the name with a [!]. Where the choice made is extremely questionable given the fact that far better names have been neglected, I will mark the name with a [?]. In cases where the choice is both obscure and questionable, I will mark the name with a [!?], similar to the classification system of chess moves, based on my own subject opinion. Here goes:
Leonidis of Sparta Sun Tzu Alexander The Great Hannibal Scipio Africanus Gais Marius [!] Pompey [?] Julius Ceasar Marcus Agrippa [!] Augustus Octavian [?] Arminius [!] Claudius [?] Trajan Constantine I Alaric I Flavius Aetius [!] Attila The Hun Belisarius [!] Alfred the Great Athestan [!] Cnut [!] Harold II [?] Charles Martel Charlemagne El Cid [!] Saladin Richard the Lionheart Genghis Khan Alexander III of Scotland [!?] Edward I Edward III Edward the Black Prince Tamerlane Henry V Gustavis II of Sweden Oliver Cromwell Sir Thomas Fairfax [!?] Prince Rupert [!?] William of Orange [?] John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough Charles XII John Campbell, Duke of Argyll [!?] Charles Stuart [?] William Augustus, Duke of Cumberland [!?] Lord Horatio Nelson Sir John Moore [!] Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington Napoleon Bonaparte Michel Ney [!?] Lord Howard of Effingham [!?] Sir Francis Drake James Wolfe Shaka Zulu Sir Colin Campbell [!?] Charles Gordon George Washington Andrew Jackson Robert E. Lee William T. Sherman Ulysses S. Grant Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson Cochise [!?] Red Cloud [!] Crazy Horse [!] Frecerick the Great Graf Helmuth von Moltke Prince Otto von Bismarck Alfred von Tirpitz [!?] Paul von Hidnenburg John Joseph Pershing Earl Douglas Haig [!?] Viscount Edmund Allenby [!] Sir Henry Rawlinson [!] Erich Ludendorff Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck [!] Kemal Ataturk Carl Gustav Mannerheim [!] Gerd von Rundstedt Douglas MacArthur Archibald Wavell [!] Viscount Allenbrooke [!?] Yamamoto Isoroku [!] George S. Patton Erich von Manstein Bernard Law Montgomery [?] Heinz Guderian [!] Dwight D. Eisenhower Erwin Rommel Harold Alexander [!?] Mao Tse-Tung William Slim [!] Omar Bradley [?] Georgy Zhukov [!] Ivan Konev [!] Vasily Chulkov [!?] Orde Wingate [!] Sir David Stirling [!?] Vo Nguyen Giap [!] Moshe Dayan [!] Colin Powell [?]
This book is nothing more than decorative toilet paper. Ney was included although Soult, Davout, and Lannes were clearly superior. It includes a loser like Rupert, but forgets the Great Conde, Turenne, and Prince Eugene, who were the military giants of their age. The British have more men represented in this book than any other nationality. Oh wait, the author is British!
I enjoyed this book. Each leader is discussed with a brief summary of highlights pertaining to their ruling careers. As a descendant of Charlemagne, I enjoyed how the author summed up my distant ancestors' contribution, "Although Charlemagne's new empire only survived for thirty years after his death, his fusion of German, Roman and Christian cultures marks the beginning of modern European civilization." This book, while informative is not in-depth by any means. It is not an academic style of book, it is more or less a coffee table read.
bom conteudo mas mal organizado. precisa de melhor organizacao para ser um otimo livro achei muitos bom a selecao, faltou talves alguns nomes japoneses mas em geral bem variado. kudo para Shaka Zulu e os indios americanos