What do you think?
Rate this book
Innocent Traitor
Lady Jane Grey was born into the most dangerous of times. Child of a scheming father and a ruthless mother for whom she is a pawn in a dynastic game with the highest stakes, she lived a life in thrall to political machinations and lethal religious fervour. Growing up with the future Queen Elizabeth and her reluctant nemesis, Mary, she soon learns the truth of the values imparted to her by Henry VIII's last Queen, Katherine Parr. Her honesty, intelligence and strength of character-carry her through all the vicious twists of Tudor power politics, to her nine-day reign and its unbearably poignant conclusion...
432 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2006
892 people are currently reading
38008 people want to read
About the author
Alison Weir
80 books8,445 followersLibrarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name.
Alison Weir is an English writer of history books for the general public, mostly in the form of biographies about British kings and queens, and of historical fiction. Before becoming an author, Weir worked as a teacher of children with special needs. She received her formal training in history at teacher training college. She currently lives in Surrey, England, with her two children.
Alison Weir is an English writer of history books for the general public, mostly in the form of biographies about British kings and queens, and of historical fiction. Before becoming an author, Weir worked as a teacher of children with special needs. She received her formal training in history at teacher training college. She currently lives in Surrey, England, with her two children.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,030 reviews
September 24, 2019
The Lady Elizabeth was bad but mildly entertaining, possibly because of the appearance of one of the most interesting figures from history, but Innocent Traitor is just plain bad. It begins with two very dull parallel birth scenes and gets worse from there. The language is tedious and pedestrian, sending me to sleep rather than catching my attention. The plot drags and is utterly predictable, for example, one day after the family has heard news that some heretics are to be burned, Jane’s nurse decides to take the children out for the day on a trip to visit her sister who lives in Smithfield. Gee, I wonder what will happen?! Yep, that’s right, it all ends in tears and traumatised kiddie-winks. This writing is just so juvenile and limp. The descriptions read just the same as in Weir’s non-fiction histories – incredibly dry, unmemorable lists. The worst of by far though was Weir’s poor research and total misunderstanding and the era.
Weir completely misunderstands the social mores of the day when she has Frances Brandon and Henry Grey acting all doom and gloom over Jane’s birth because she’s a daughter. She’s transferring the concerns of Henry VIII onto the couple. How she manages to do this when she’s a writer of non-fiction histories boggles the mind. Frances and Henry were still young at 20 years old and had only been married for four years, and whilst sons were undoubtedly desired, it was hardly a disaster for the Greys to have only daughters. King Henry VIII meanwhile, at the time the future Edward VI was born, was 46 years old, on his third marriage after almost 30 years of married life, and had only two surviving acknowledged but illegitimated daughters, and it was important to him to have a son because it was unprecedented for a woman to be accepted as ruler of England in her own right and the young Tudor dynasty could still be overthrown.
Weir also includes the nonsense about the Duke of Northumberland poisoning Edward VI and then smothering a lookalike and switching the bodies so that the “king’s corpse” would have no evidence of foul play. I cannot stress enough how absurd this is. In her author’s note Weir claims that the evidence for this is written in a letter by one of the duke’s sons, but that is completely made up - it's hearsay, and not mentioned in any letter written by one of the duke's sons. Mary and Elizabeth Tudor are titled "Princess" in the book when they were actually titled "Lady". Jane Parker is once again condemned for taking down Anne and George Boleyn. Frances and Adrian Stokes are described according to the painting which for years now has been known to actually be Mary Neville and her son. Oh, and of course, Frances and Henry Grey beat their poor daughter Jane black and blue. Tempted as I am to explain in detail exactly why all of this is wrong, I'm simply going to link y'all to that business and you can click on it if you're interested.
Jane Parker and the Boleyns' downfall
What really happened to Edward VI's body
The many misconceptions about Frances Brandon
Essentially, Weir shoves in every scrap of rumour and gossip from the era. Whether she did this out of sheer bad research or purposely to make things "juicier", I don't know, but it doesn't improve the pedestrian prose, only adds a repellent splash of lurid crassness.
Innocent Traitor is dull, wildly inaccurate, and unimpressive.
2 out of 10
Weir completely misunderstands the social mores of the day when she has Frances Brandon and Henry Grey acting all doom and gloom over Jane’s birth because she’s a daughter. She’s transferring the concerns of Henry VIII onto the couple. How she manages to do this when she’s a writer of non-fiction histories boggles the mind. Frances and Henry were still young at 20 years old and had only been married for four years, and whilst sons were undoubtedly desired, it was hardly a disaster for the Greys to have only daughters. King Henry VIII meanwhile, at the time the future Edward VI was born, was 46 years old, on his third marriage after almost 30 years of married life, and had only two surviving acknowledged but illegitimated daughters, and it was important to him to have a son because it was unprecedented for a woman to be accepted as ruler of England in her own right and the young Tudor dynasty could still be overthrown.
Weir also includes the nonsense about the Duke of Northumberland poisoning Edward VI and then smothering a lookalike and switching the bodies so that the “king’s corpse” would have no evidence of foul play. I cannot stress enough how absurd this is. In her author’s note Weir claims that the evidence for this is written in a letter by one of the duke’s sons, but that is completely made up - it's hearsay, and not mentioned in any letter written by one of the duke's sons. Mary and Elizabeth Tudor are titled "Princess" in the book when they were actually titled "Lady". Jane Parker is once again condemned for taking down Anne and George Boleyn. Frances and Adrian Stokes are described according to the painting which for years now has been known to actually be Mary Neville and her son. Oh, and of course, Frances and Henry Grey beat their poor daughter Jane black and blue. Tempted as I am to explain in detail exactly why all of this is wrong, I'm simply going to link y'all to that business and you can click on it if you're interested.
Jane Parker and the Boleyns' downfall
What really happened to Edward VI's body
The many misconceptions about Frances Brandon
Essentially, Weir shoves in every scrap of rumour and gossip from the era. Whether she did this out of sheer bad research or purposely to make things "juicier", I don't know, but it doesn't improve the pedestrian prose, only adds a repellent splash of lurid crassness.
Innocent Traitor is dull, wildly inaccurate, and unimpressive.
2 out of 10
September 26, 2017
و بالاخره تموم شد!
اگر از دسته دوستداران رمان های تاریخی هستید حتما این کتاب رو بخونید.
از اونجایی که کتاب از زبان راوی های مختلف بیان میشه از اون حالت خسته کننده و یکنواختی که معمولا رمان های تاریخی حجیمِ مشابه گرفتارش میشن تا حد زیادی خارج شده، و ترجمه خیلی خوب کتاب میتونه دلیل دیگه ای برای اثبات این ادعا باشه.
بیشتر راوی ها زن هستند که باعث آشنایی بیشتر با افکار و عقاید زنان درباره خود و عقاید دیگران درباره جنس مونث میشه. (هرچند این عقاید و افکار باعث عصبانیت میشن)
اگر از دسته دوستداران رمان های تاریخی هستید حتما این کتاب رو بخونید.
از اونجایی که کتاب از زبان راوی های مختلف بیان میشه از اون حالت خسته کننده و یکنواختی که معمولا رمان های تاریخی حجیمِ مشابه گرفتارش میشن تا حد زیادی خارج شده، و ترجمه خیلی خوب کتاب میتونه دلیل دیگه ای برای اثبات این ادعا باشه.
بیشتر راوی ها زن هستند که باعث آشنایی بیشتر با افکار و عقاید زنان درباره خود و عقاید دیگران درباره جنس مونث میشه. (هرچند این عقاید و افکار باعث عصبانیت میشن)
August 27, 2017
Lady Jane Grey, born either 1536 or 1537, was highly gifted, precocious and intelligent but she was born into a time when her life was constrained by her parents and their machinations at the royal court. Her birth was a disappointment to her parents who, like most medieval parents, had longed for a son although they soon pinned their hopes on her marrying Henry VIII's son, Edward VI. But during Edward's final illness their choice for Jane changed, due to the machinations of John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland and Edward's Regent, and she was betrothed to the Duke's own son, Guildford Dudley. Jane was, of course Edward's cousin and had been named his successor to the throne, apparently after much 'handling' by the Duke.
One of the few joys in Jane's short life was the two years which she spent as a lady in waiting to Queen Katherine Parr, Henry VIII's last wife. Upon Katherine's death in 1548, Jane was unceremoniously and unwillingly returned to her family home. It was then that Jane met tutor to Elizabeth I, Roger Ascham. Ascham noted Jane's complaint about her parents:
“For when I am in presence either of father or mother; whether I speak, keep silence, sit, stand, or go, eat, drink, be merry, or sad, be sewing, playing, dancing, or doing any thing else; I must do it, as it were, in such weight, measure, and number, even so perfectly, as God made the world; or else I am so sharply taunted, so cruelly threatened, yea presently sometimes with pinches, nips, and bobs, and other ways (which I will not name for the honour I bear them) so without measure misordered, that I think myself in hell, till time come that I must go to Mr Elmer; who teacheth me so gently, so pleasantly, with such fair allurements to learning, that I think all the time nothing whiles I am with him. And when I am called from him, I fall on weeping, because whatsoever I do else but learning, is full of grief, trouble, fear, and whole misliking unto me. And thus my book hath been so much my pleasure, and bringeth daily to me more pleasure and more, that in respect of it, all other pleasures, in very deed, be but trifles and troubles unto me.”
Roger Ascham was so impressed with Jane's intelligence that he set up correspondence between her and many learned men, in England and Europe. A staunch Protestant, she would correspond and debate with them on various subjects including theology. Edward VI died on July 6 1553 and the unwilling Jane's famously short reign as Queen began on July 10th, ending on July 19th when Mary I was named the true monarch and Jane was charged with treason. Her sad life ended on Tower Green in Tower of London on 12th February 1554.
Alison Weir has selected a tragic heroine for her first historical fiction novel but I felt that she doesn't impart much personality into any of her characters. You are getting the facts but there's not a lot a feeling here. Of course, you'd have to be a rock not to feel for Jane's situation or to dislike Frances Brandon, Jane's mother but I did not feel the characters speaking to me. I loved the nurse Mrs Ellen who, unlike her parents, actually loved Jane and was with her from a very early age right up until the moment of her death. While the cover exhorted me to cry for Jane, I did not but I have felt an overwhelming sense of sadness for this young girl since I read her story. While I would recommend that you read this novel because it provides much historical detail, I can only rate it 3.5★.
One of the few joys in Jane's short life was the two years which she spent as a lady in waiting to Queen Katherine Parr, Henry VIII's last wife. Upon Katherine's death in 1548, Jane was unceremoniously and unwillingly returned to her family home. It was then that Jane met tutor to Elizabeth I, Roger Ascham. Ascham noted Jane's complaint about her parents:
“For when I am in presence either of father or mother; whether I speak, keep silence, sit, stand, or go, eat, drink, be merry, or sad, be sewing, playing, dancing, or doing any thing else; I must do it, as it were, in such weight, measure, and number, even so perfectly, as God made the world; or else I am so sharply taunted, so cruelly threatened, yea presently sometimes with pinches, nips, and bobs, and other ways (which I will not name for the honour I bear them) so without measure misordered, that I think myself in hell, till time come that I must go to Mr Elmer; who teacheth me so gently, so pleasantly, with such fair allurements to learning, that I think all the time nothing whiles I am with him. And when I am called from him, I fall on weeping, because whatsoever I do else but learning, is full of grief, trouble, fear, and whole misliking unto me. And thus my book hath been so much my pleasure, and bringeth daily to me more pleasure and more, that in respect of it, all other pleasures, in very deed, be but trifles and troubles unto me.”
Roger Ascham was so impressed with Jane's intelligence that he set up correspondence between her and many learned men, in England and Europe. A staunch Protestant, she would correspond and debate with them on various subjects including theology. Edward VI died on July 6 1553 and the unwilling Jane's famously short reign as Queen began on July 10th, ending on July 19th when Mary I was named the true monarch and Jane was charged with treason. Her sad life ended on Tower Green in Tower of London on 12th February 1554.
Alison Weir has selected a tragic heroine for her first historical fiction novel but I felt that she doesn't impart much personality into any of her characters. You are getting the facts but there's not a lot a feeling here. Of course, you'd have to be a rock not to feel for Jane's situation or to dislike Frances Brandon, Jane's mother but I did not feel the characters speaking to me. I loved the nurse Mrs Ellen who, unlike her parents, actually loved Jane and was with her from a very early age right up until the moment of her death. While the cover exhorted me to cry for Jane, I did not but I have felt an overwhelming sense of sadness for this young girl since I read her story. While I would recommend that you read this novel because it provides much historical detail, I can only rate it 3.5★.
July 3, 2023
Lady Jane Grey (1537-1554) was born during the reign of Henry VIII to ambitious parents who trained her for an important position. She was a quiet, precocious girl who loved learning and was extremely well educated. Jane was a Protestant who spent much of her time on religious studies. Jane always felt that her parents were disappointed that she was not a boy. After forcing Jane into a marriage that she did not want, they hatched a plot to gain power in the royal court.
Henry VIII's heir was Edward VI, but he died at a young age. Henry's daughter's Mary and Elizabeth were next in succession, but they were considered "bastards" after Henry's marriages were annulled. Lady Jane Grey's mother was a niece of Henry VIII. Through some questionable legal maneuvers, Lady Jane became queen for nine days. Lady Jane had no wish to be appointed queen, but finally accepted it to prevent Mary, a devout Catholic, from taking the throne. Mary fought back with a large army, and a time of religious unrest and violence followed.
This was a fascinating book about a lovely, innocent girl who got caught up in other people's plans for power with tragic results. It was also interesting how Henry VIII's decision to break with Rome eventually snowballed into a religious bloodbath. Alison Weir brought history to life in this excellent historical novel.
Henry VIII's heir was Edward VI, but he died at a young age. Henry's daughter's Mary and Elizabeth were next in succession, but they were considered "bastards" after Henry's marriages were annulled. Lady Jane Grey's mother was a niece of Henry VIII. Through some questionable legal maneuvers, Lady Jane became queen for nine days. Lady Jane had no wish to be appointed queen, but finally accepted it to prevent Mary, a devout Catholic, from taking the throne. Mary fought back with a large army, and a time of religious unrest and violence followed.
This was a fascinating book about a lovely, innocent girl who got caught up in other people's plans for power with tragic results. It was also interesting how Henry VIII's decision to break with Rome eventually snowballed into a religious bloodbath. Alison Weir brought history to life in this excellent historical novel.
March 24, 2023
Innocent Traitor is what should be a fascinating narrative of the life of the young Lady Jane Grey, the little-known queen that reigned for a mere 9 days - yet somehow it isn't. Something is lacking.
It's written from several different perspectives that tend to blend together because none of the characters have unique voices. Though I've found myself consumed by thoughts of Jane's difficult life for several hours after finishing the last page, I think this is because I know that Jane Grey was a real person, and not because I was enthralled by this book.
Still - it was a decent read, and I learned quite a bit. Most of this novel is true; Alison Weir has only added bits here and there for flavour, and these have all been recorded in a little blurb at the end of the book. Turns out the most unbelievable parts are actually true. Which is incredibly satisfying albeit alarming.
It's written from several different perspectives that tend to blend together because none of the characters have unique voices. Though I've found myself consumed by thoughts of Jane's difficult life for several hours after finishing the last page, I think this is because I know that Jane Grey was a real person, and not because I was enthralled by this book.
Still - it was a decent read, and I learned quite a bit. Most of this novel is true; Alison Weir has only added bits here and there for flavour, and these have all been recorded in a little blurb at the end of the book. Turns out the most unbelievable parts are actually true. Which is incredibly satisfying albeit alarming.
April 17, 2011
Lady Jane Grey, the grand niece of Henry VIII, and queen of England for just over a week in 1553 is the subject of Innocent Traitor, Alison Weir’s first work of historical fiction. With over ten works of history to her credit, Weir is one of my favorite British Renaissance and Reformation historians mostly because she presents the Catholic and Protestant theological differences of the era in an impartial manner without resorting to inflammatory or stereotypical rhetoric.
Innocent Traitor is a very ‘good read’. It presents the story of the young Jane’s life from the perspectives of those closest to her, through the major, known events of her all too short life. The few historical ‘facts’ I’ve checked out all did—as if I had any doubt. I really knew they would, mostly I was just curious on one or two points. If Innocent Traitor has any weakness, it would be in the beginning where it seemed/sounded like all the characters spoke with the same voice. I didn’t notice this as much later on in the story, so I don’t know if I got to know the different characters, if I just became so engrossed in the story, I stopped paying attention, or if in fact the characterizations did get better. In the beginning, it especially bothered me that Jane sounded like an adult at three and five.
That criticism aside it’s a very absorbing read. Why anyone would have wanted to be a monarch back in those days is beyond me. And yet so many did—and paid the ultimate price for such ambition. Poor Jane only wanted a quiet life with her books and look what she got?! After the Reformation equivalent to a Dickensian childhood, she became the pawn of her parents and the Duke of Northumberland, was given in marriage to an abusive husband, maneuvered into a crown she didn’t want, lost it, was abandoned by everyone, thrown into prison and finally—thanks to her father’s second treachery against the Crown—Jane received the verdict of treason and was executed.
There were some speculative additions to fill in parts of history which remain unknown, and yet Weir's choices are still probable.
Recommended.
Innocent Traitor is a very ‘good read’. It presents the story of the young Jane’s life from the perspectives of those closest to her, through the major, known events of her all too short life. The few historical ‘facts’ I’ve checked out all did—as if I had any doubt. I really knew they would, mostly I was just curious on one or two points. If Innocent Traitor has any weakness, it would be in the beginning where it seemed/sounded like all the characters spoke with the same voice. I didn’t notice this as much later on in the story, so I don’t know if I got to know the different characters, if I just became so engrossed in the story, I stopped paying attention, or if in fact the characterizations did get better. In the beginning, it especially bothered me that Jane sounded like an adult at three and five.
That criticism aside it’s a very absorbing read. Why anyone would have wanted to be a monarch back in those days is beyond me. And yet so many did—and paid the ultimate price for such ambition. Poor Jane only wanted a quiet life with her books and look what she got?! After the Reformation equivalent to a Dickensian childhood, she became the pawn of her parents and the Duke of Northumberland, was given in marriage to an abusive husband, maneuvered into a crown she didn’t want, lost it, was abandoned by everyone, thrown into prison and finally—thanks to her father’s second treachery against the Crown—Jane received the verdict of treason and was executed.
There were some speculative additions to fill in parts of history which remain unknown, and yet Weir's choices are still probable.
Recommended.
June 3, 2018
I have read lots of books on Catherine, Anne Boleyn, Elizabeth, Mary and of course Henry VIII.
But I haven't ventured into his other wives stories/history yet nor any other Tudor relations.
And I really knew very little at all about Lady Jane Grey.
I really enjoyed her story, and found her to be quite a resourceful character.
Loved the part where she had to go to the "Privy" but was to scared to leave, so she just lifted her skirts and let it go and hoped the dogs would be blamed!
As the reader, we watch her grow from childhood to a young adult..although at times I felt the author made Jane too old for the age that she was at.
At times I didn't know if she was 3 years old or 16.
Also at times I found the flipping of Jane to her mother confusing.
And was her mother really that awful?
Or was this just how the author portrayed her?
These parents were down right horrible and my heart went out for Jane as well as the other two girls.
But other than that, I really enjoyed the story told of Lady Jane Grey..but since I didn't know the out come of her future, it was a very sad surprise ending indeed. :(
But I haven't ventured into his other wives stories/history yet nor any other Tudor relations.
And I really knew very little at all about Lady Jane Grey.
I really enjoyed her story, and found her to be quite a resourceful character.
Loved the part where she had to go to the "Privy" but was to scared to leave, so she just lifted her skirts and let it go and hoped the dogs would be blamed!
As the reader, we watch her grow from childhood to a young adult..although at times I felt the author made Jane too old for the age that she was at.
At times I didn't know if she was 3 years old or 16.
Also at times I found the flipping of Jane to her mother confusing.
And was her mother really that awful?
Or was this just how the author portrayed her?
These parents were down right horrible and my heart went out for Jane as well as the other two girls.
But other than that, I really enjoyed the story told of Lady Jane Grey..but since I didn't know the out come of her future, it was a very sad surprise ending indeed. :(
December 8, 2024
I got lost in this book! I had planned on reading all Alison Weir’s books but I had taken a break from because I got tired of the same narrator. Innocent Traitor has a cast of narrators and is written as diary entries. I like how well researched Weir’s books are.
What a sad, short life Lady Jane Grey lived.
TW: rape
What a sad, short life Lady Jane Grey lived.
TW: rape
July 9, 2021
nghilterra, 1554: Jane Grey, sovrana per appena 9 giorni, si aggira nella dimora di Master Partridge, il carceriere della torre di Londra. In quell'edificio che si affaccia sulla Tower Green, dove fu giustiziata anni prima Anna Bolena, è tenuta prigioniera insieme alle sue dame di compagnia, dopo essere stata giudicata colpevole di alto tradimento e condannata, poco più che sedicenne, a essere bruciata viva a Tower Hill, o decapitata, secondo il volere della regina Maria. Ha un'unica possibilità per salvarsi, stando almeno alla promessa dell'anziano abate di Westminster: se abiurerà la fede riformata, Maria Tudor, da poco impossessata si del trono con la ferma intenzione di restaurare nel regno la regione Cattolica, le concederà la grazia. Lady Jane, tuttavia, è pronta a riconoscere le sue colpe, ma non può tradire il proprio credo e barattare la vita eterna con quella terrena.
La vita di Jane Grey viene raccontata da diversi punti di vista, come se stessimo leggendo un diario. Infatti, si alternano i pensieri di Frances Brandon, la madre di Jane, della stessa Jane bambina, della Jane adolescente, della cugina Maria Tudor e altri personaggi ancora. Un romanzo corale che fa immergere il lettore nell'Inghilterra dello scisma religioso, fra cattolici e protestanti. Con uno schiocco di dita si accendono roghi e volano teste, anche fra chi ha dentro di sé il sangue dei Tudor. In questo modo, il romanzo viene raccontato attraverso il punto di vista di Maria, fervente cattolica e Jane, convinta protestante. In un mondo governato da adulti, ma soprattutto da uomini, le donne, ancora meglio se molto giovani, diventano merce di scambio per un buon matrimonio. A farne le spese sarà proprio Jane, tradita in un gioco messo in scena da uomini bramosi di potere.
Alison Weir porta in opera un personaggio dell'Inghilterra dei Tudor poco conosciuto, con una scrittura, come ho già detto tante volte, magistrale. La curiosità del lettore, viene soddisfatta pienamente in queste pagine, caratterizzando bene i personaggi, con un enorme lavoro storico di approfondimento. Lo consiglio a tutti gli amanti degli storici: non vi pentirete della Weir!
La vita di Jane Grey viene raccontata da diversi punti di vista, come se stessimo leggendo un diario. Infatti, si alternano i pensieri di Frances Brandon, la madre di Jane, della stessa Jane bambina, della Jane adolescente, della cugina Maria Tudor e altri personaggi ancora. Un romanzo corale che fa immergere il lettore nell'Inghilterra dello scisma religioso, fra cattolici e protestanti. Con uno schiocco di dita si accendono roghi e volano teste, anche fra chi ha dentro di sé il sangue dei Tudor. In questo modo, il romanzo viene raccontato attraverso il punto di vista di Maria, fervente cattolica e Jane, convinta protestante. In un mondo governato da adulti, ma soprattutto da uomini, le donne, ancora meglio se molto giovani, diventano merce di scambio per un buon matrimonio. A farne le spese sarà proprio Jane, tradita in un gioco messo in scena da uomini bramosi di potere.
Alison Weir porta in opera un personaggio dell'Inghilterra dei Tudor poco conosciuto, con una scrittura, come ho già detto tante volte, magistrale. La curiosità del lettore, viene soddisfatta pienamente in queste pagine, caratterizzando bene i personaggi, con un enorme lavoro storico di approfondimento. Lo consiglio a tutti gli amanti degli storici: non vi pentirete della Weir!
April 25, 2017
This was such a tragic novel based on a very tragic young lady, the Lady Jane Grey. Every time I read a novel detailing the life of the Tudor court and its aftermath, I can't help coming away with the sense that many fathers and mothers literally prostituted their children for the gain of power. They were so filled with the drug called power that they were willing to sacrifice their own progeny to fulfill their desires. Truly, this was the case with Lady Jane's family. They in their insatiable lust for power, literally sacrificed their daughter so that in the end at a bare sixteen years old, her life was taken.
Jane was known to be a very intelligent child through some of the writing left of hers attests to that fact, and also was purported to have been harshly raised by an unfeeling mother and a father who placed himself above all others. Jane was a innocent in the game played by her parents and the Lord Northumberland that placed her upon the throne after the death of Edward VI. This was a throne she did not ever want and which she only held for nine days, the shortest reign in all of English history. She was a pawn, a defenseless child, whose life was taken because of fear and the unjust determination of her being a threat to Queen Mary. So sad and so very tragic that this was the way of women's lives in the fifteenth century. Children were pieces in their parents game of life and that life these parents aspired to was one of total power and control. They would and di use anyone and anything to gain it.
Jane was known to be a very intelligent child through some of the writing left of hers attests to that fact, and also was purported to have been harshly raised by an unfeeling mother and a father who placed himself above all others. Jane was a innocent in the game played by her parents and the Lord Northumberland that placed her upon the throne after the death of Edward VI. This was a throne she did not ever want and which she only held for nine days, the shortest reign in all of English history. She was a pawn, a defenseless child, whose life was taken because of fear and the unjust determination of her being a threat to Queen Mary. So sad and so very tragic that this was the way of women's lives in the fifteenth century. Children were pieces in their parents game of life and that life these parents aspired to was one of total power and control. They would and di use anyone and anything to gain it.
February 22, 2025
برگشتم و به امتیاز این کتاب نگاه کردم و به نظر این کتاب خیلیی برام عزیزه و صد در صد برام یه 5 ستاره بود و نمیدونم چرا بهش پنج ندادم ولی هرچی میگذره بیشتر از این کتاب خوشم میاد
December 15, 2016
This is the story of Lady Jane Grey, who was Queen of England for nine days in 1553. Alison Weir normally write historical biographies, this is her first historical novel. I've never read anything about Lady Jane Grey, and thought the detail provided on the major role of religion at this time, in all political decisions was very well portrayed. This was my first multiple narrator audio book and I thoroughly enjoyed the experience, I think it helped me connect to the different characters. Although I liked and felt for Jane (the ending had me sobbing in the car), I felt that her reasons for acting the way she did, did not feel authentic. Throughout the book she felt sorry for herself about the way her mother treated her, the fact that they chose her husband etc, but I think these things were the norm for that time. I liked the book, but felt it was too long.
February 7, 2017
*****This is a review for the audio book.
This was well-written. I loved how detailed the history was. The author did a lot research and took few liberties with telling the story. I really loved getting to know Lady Jane Grey. This is one of most tragic story I've heard in awhile. However, I would recommend it. I would say this should be read before most of these other books set in the Tudor era, though. This was my first book I've read by Alison Weir, but it definitely won't be my last.
This was well-written. I loved how detailed the history was. The author did a lot research and took few liberties with telling the story. I really loved getting to know Lady Jane Grey. This is one of most tragic story I've heard in awhile. However, I would recommend it. I would say this should be read before most of these other books set in the Tudor era, though. This was my first book I've read by Alison Weir, but it definitely won't be my last.
September 17, 2025
این کتابو خیلی دوست داشتم . این که کتاب از زبان شخصیت های مختلف روایت میشد جذابیتشو از نظر من دوچندان کرده بود
اما در مورد خود داستان باید بگم تا ابد لیدی جین و معصومیتش و بی گناه قربانی شدنش تو قلب و ذهنم میمونه .
اما در مورد خود داستان باید بگم تا ابد لیدی جین و معصومیتش و بی گناه قربانی شدنش تو قلب و ذهنم میمونه .
October 10, 2009
Lady Jane Grey was born as a disappointment—a daughter instead of a son. Her mother said upon her birth in this historical novel (Page 5): “I should be joyful, thanking God for the arrival of a lusty child. Instead my spirits plummet. All this—for nothing.” Daughter of Henry Grey, Duke of Suffolk and Frances Brandon, grand-daughter of King Henry VII and related to King Henry VIII, her parents’ ambition dominated Jane’s life. Her parents’ goal? A marriage that would bring the family power. The original hope was for her to marry Edward, son of Henry VIII.
As a child, Jane is treated poorly by her parents, although her father shows some interest in her. She is an engaging child, with a curious mind. She enjoys learning—from languages to music to the classics. The book’s treatment of her makes her into a little woman when she was probably too young to think in the manner attributable to her. Still, in that era, childhood as we know it did not exist.
Events in the book are portrayed first person, through the eyes of a number of people—from Lady Jane Grey to her parents to Mrs. Ellen to Queen Jane Seymour to Queen Mary to the Duke of Northumberland and so on. While this adds a personal perspective that works pretty well, it can sometimes be a bit too kaleidoscopic for my taste. Through these various characters, we learn of the great events of the day as they happen—Henry VIII’s marriages to Anne of Cleves, Katherine Howard, Katherine Parr, Edward VI’s brief reign, internal and external crises facing the country.
But, of course, the arc of this work is the brief reign of Lade Jane Grey as Queen Jane. Her parents and important figures such as Northumberland maneuvered to make her Queen rather than allowing the Catholic Mary to gain the throne. They trusted that the English citizenry would reject Mary and that they could manipulate Jane as a figurehead to run England as they chose. The novel shows how Jane tried to be a Queen but found herself thwarted by those who would use her. Her miserable marriage to a Dudley did not help matters. After only a fortnight as Queen, forces loyal to Mary overthrew the lot of nobles who had plotted to make Jane Queen. Then, the slow denouement, as Mary slowly came to see that, for many reasons, she had to remove Jane from the scene—although she saw her as innocent. The very title of this work, "Innocent Traitor,” says a great deal. The novel ends with real emotional pop, as Jane prepared a simple speech to give before her death. Her dignity, compared with the whimpering of men much more guilty than she, provides a remarkable contrast (this isn’t a spoiler; if people don’t know what happened to Lady Jane Grey, they don’t know much about history!).
Anyhow, despite some problematic choices by the author, Alison Weir, this is a compelling piece of historical fiction. Do read the author’s note at the end. The author discusses the choices that she made in writing portions of the book where there is uncertainty in the historical record or where she took a certain degree of creative license.
As a child, Jane is treated poorly by her parents, although her father shows some interest in her. She is an engaging child, with a curious mind. She enjoys learning—from languages to music to the classics. The book’s treatment of her makes her into a little woman when she was probably too young to think in the manner attributable to her. Still, in that era, childhood as we know it did not exist.
Events in the book are portrayed first person, through the eyes of a number of people—from Lady Jane Grey to her parents to Mrs. Ellen to Queen Jane Seymour to Queen Mary to the Duke of Northumberland and so on. While this adds a personal perspective that works pretty well, it can sometimes be a bit too kaleidoscopic for my taste. Through these various characters, we learn of the great events of the day as they happen—Henry VIII’s marriages to Anne of Cleves, Katherine Howard, Katherine Parr, Edward VI’s brief reign, internal and external crises facing the country.
But, of course, the arc of this work is the brief reign of Lade Jane Grey as Queen Jane. Her parents and important figures such as Northumberland maneuvered to make her Queen rather than allowing the Catholic Mary to gain the throne. They trusted that the English citizenry would reject Mary and that they could manipulate Jane as a figurehead to run England as they chose. The novel shows how Jane tried to be a Queen but found herself thwarted by those who would use her. Her miserable marriage to a Dudley did not help matters. After only a fortnight as Queen, forces loyal to Mary overthrew the lot of nobles who had plotted to make Jane Queen. Then, the slow denouement, as Mary slowly came to see that, for many reasons, she had to remove Jane from the scene—although she saw her as innocent. The very title of this work, "Innocent Traitor,” says a great deal. The novel ends with real emotional pop, as Jane prepared a simple speech to give before her death. Her dignity, compared with the whimpering of men much more guilty than she, provides a remarkable contrast (this isn’t a spoiler; if people don’t know what happened to Lady Jane Grey, they don’t know much about history!).
Anyhow, despite some problematic choices by the author, Alison Weir, this is a compelling piece of historical fiction. Do read the author’s note at the end. The author discusses the choices that she made in writing portions of the book where there is uncertainty in the historical record or where she took a certain degree of creative license.
January 23, 2015
It’s much better if you love history. Even if you don’t, the format of the book should compensate for the lack of interest in historical books. This is not historical fiction, though the writer (Alison Weir) has taken the liberty of imagination at certain points, and to good effect.
The places where the text adds imaginative adornments are described at the end of the book, so, if you are persnickety about poetic license, you wouldn’t be too upset.
Personally, interest in the life of Lady Jane Grey was kindled because of a painting that hangs in the National Gallery in London – The Execution of Jane Grey, Paul Delarouche. While I consider myself to be a fairly illiterate in terms of art appreciation, this particular masterpiece, has somehow always attracted me to it, sent many a question to my head. It was indeed fortuitous that my artist friend picks up the book and asks how come I missed noticing this book. I am happy, however, that she did notice the book and I did pick it.
The book is written in the first person, which helps change, the perspective of looking at history. You look at the events from the point of view of the character, in the event, at that time. It adds certain emotion and ‘personality’ to the event(s) and allows history to become warmer than a chronological the presentation of cold facts. And a brave attempt, may I add, for Alison says:
[…] I have tried to penetrate the minds of my characters, which is something that serious historians attempt only at their peril.
There are, I know, a few fussy writers who insist on the facts and the gaps in availability of historical data to be left as empty and dark as a question mark. However, this book, does offer a glow in that abyss. John Man speculates fairly well when he has to deal with gaps in history. His fillers, however, are more based on reason and logic. He does wonderful justice too – makes for interesting reading. Yet, it is all in the third person.
To read something written by the character, is a new found pleasure for me.
The places where the text adds imaginative adornments are described at the end of the book, so, if you are persnickety about poetic license, you wouldn’t be too upset.
Personally, interest in the life of Lady Jane Grey was kindled because of a painting that hangs in the National Gallery in London – The Execution of Jane Grey, Paul Delarouche. While I consider myself to be a fairly illiterate in terms of art appreciation, this particular masterpiece, has somehow always attracted me to it, sent many a question to my head. It was indeed fortuitous that my artist friend picks up the book and asks how come I missed noticing this book. I am happy, however, that she did notice the book and I did pick it.
The book is written in the first person, which helps change, the perspective of looking at history. You look at the events from the point of view of the character, in the event, at that time. It adds certain emotion and ‘personality’ to the event(s) and allows history to become warmer than a chronological the presentation of cold facts. And a brave attempt, may I add, for Alison says:
[…] I have tried to penetrate the minds of my characters, which is something that serious historians attempt only at their peril.
There are, I know, a few fussy writers who insist on the facts and the gaps in availability of historical data to be left as empty and dark as a question mark. However, this book, does offer a glow in that abyss. John Man speculates fairly well when he has to deal with gaps in history. His fillers, however, are more based on reason and logic. He does wonderful justice too – makes for interesting reading. Yet, it is all in the third person.
To read something written by the character, is a new found pleasure for me.
Read
May 4, 2021Hrm. I think I would've enjoyed this more if it had been a straightforward history textbook instead of an attempt at prose. The multiple POVs are mutually indistinguishable, Jane at age 4 sounding the same as her mother as the queen as the duke and so on. The dialogue all sounds scripted, and the emotions are overwrought and rarely wring true.
This, from what I could tell, is much better researched than the usual Tudor trope, but the writing made it less enjoyable than the lesser works. I definitely would rather read a textbook written in conversational style. [EDIT: I've now read some of her straight-up history texts, and prefer them immensely to this. I was right -- Ms. Weir just can't handle prose and character voice.]
One point: I'm tired of Tudor-era books writing graphic descriptions of rape. It's out of place and just feels really uncomfortable -- kind of like gore-porn. Just because it's historical doesn't make rape entertaining or somehow okay to portray in ways that modern fiction would shy away from.
[EDIT AGAIN: The rape thing is extremely irritating when you realize that the book shies away from actually depicting Jane's beheading. So it's okay to have the rape, but not her head cut off? I call foul.]
This, from what I could tell, is much better researched than the usual Tudor trope, but the writing made it less enjoyable than the lesser works. I definitely would rather read a textbook written in conversational style. [EDIT: I've now read some of her straight-up history texts, and prefer them immensely to this. I was right -- Ms. Weir just can't handle prose and character voice.]
One point: I'm tired of Tudor-era books writing graphic descriptions of rape. It's out of place and just feels really uncomfortable -- kind of like gore-porn. Just because it's historical doesn't make rape entertaining or somehow okay to portray in ways that modern fiction would shy away from.
[EDIT AGAIN: The rape thing is extremely irritating when you realize that the book shies away from actually depicting Jane's beheading. So it's okay to have the rape, but not her head cut off? I call foul.]
January 13, 2009
I'm not sure what it is, exactly, but Weir's writing style makes me nuts. I can't read her. I've tried three times now and never made it more than a quarter of the way through the book. My s-i-l, normally a woman with decent taste in books, swears by her and in fact loaned me this book and "The Lady Elizabeth." And I know lots of people like her style... I wish I could pin point what about this make me cringe. But her language use just leaves me flat, bored, and irritable.
Read
February 6, 2018DNF @ 11%.
I especially couldn't get into the different points-of-view as they all sound the same..it was difficult to distinguish the 4 year old Jane Grey from her nanny or mother. I also don't know if I'm interested in 400+ pages on Jane Grey.
I especially couldn't get into the different points-of-view as they all sound the same..it was difficult to distinguish the 4 year old Jane Grey from her nanny or mother. I also don't know if I'm interested in 400+ pages on Jane Grey.
May 29, 2009
I enjoyed this book, sad and flawed as it was. I knew the bare outline of the life of Lady Jane Grey, although, in spite of having read some version or other of Foxe's Book of Martyrs several times in my childhood, had forgotten that she is considered a martyr by the Anglican Church. It was therefore interesting to read a more detailed version of her story. Yes, I know the account is fictional but with such a reknowned historian writing we can be fairly certain that the events, if not the motives for them, are fairly accurately recounted.
The device of having multiple narrators is a useful one, making it easy to reveal the thoughts of key characters, but I'm not convinced that Wier has the novel-writing expertise to pull it off. There were places where she showed her pedigree as an historian by having people describe the quotodian in a way that helped to set the scene but that no-one talking to a contemporary would have thought to do. For example, a subtle anachronism - a reference to the discomfort of travelling in an unsprung carriage at a time when few, if any, benefitted from this convenience - was the very one I remember being cautioned against by my Latin teacher.
It was also hard to remember just how young Lady Jane was. There were obvious gaps in her understanding when she was very small, and no doubt she was forced to grow up quickly, but there was little difference between her voice at four years and at sixteen. Even the most precocious and formal of children betray their age at some points and she would have been a more endearing - rather than merely sympathetic - character had we seen more of her childish, as opposed to technical, innocence.
What does come across in this account is Jane's integrity: she may have been a pawn of more powerful people in terms of being placed on the throne, but here she has to be convinced that there is some justification for it first, and it is her courage in holding fast to what she believes to be right that is the ultimate reason for her death at the hands of a reluctant Mary.
In spite of its flaws, a powerful and gripping telling of the tale of one of Britain's often overlooked monarchs.
The device of having multiple narrators is a useful one, making it easy to reveal the thoughts of key characters, but I'm not convinced that Wier has the novel-writing expertise to pull it off. There were places where she showed her pedigree as an historian by having people describe the quotodian in a way that helped to set the scene but that no-one talking to a contemporary would have thought to do. For example, a subtle anachronism - a reference to the discomfort of travelling in an unsprung carriage at a time when few, if any, benefitted from this convenience - was the very one I remember being cautioned against by my Latin teacher.
It was also hard to remember just how young Lady Jane was. There were obvious gaps in her understanding when she was very small, and no doubt she was forced to grow up quickly, but there was little difference between her voice at four years and at sixteen. Even the most precocious and formal of children betray their age at some points and she would have been a more endearing - rather than merely sympathetic - character had we seen more of her childish, as opposed to technical, innocence.
What does come across in this account is Jane's integrity: she may have been a pawn of more powerful people in terms of being placed on the throne, but here she has to be convinced that there is some justification for it first, and it is her courage in holding fast to what she believes to be right that is the ultimate reason for her death at the hands of a reluctant Mary.
In spite of its flaws, a powerful and gripping telling of the tale of one of Britain's often overlooked monarchs.
December 13, 2022
My gosh this was powerful. To write such a captivating book when everyone already knows the ending is a true skill. This taught me so much more about the tragic life of Lady Jane Grey and the kind of strong and fierce person she was. A very emotional read that really moved me. This is a story that deserved to be told.
May 30, 2014
ETA: I later read The Life of Elizabeth I, one of her non-fiction books. I found it much better. I gave it four stars! Amazingly enough it was the non-fiction book that drew me in, where I totally empathized with the characters.
*****************************
On completion:
So what do I like (and not like) about Innocent Traitor? I like that in a relatively short book one gets a quick summary of Tudor history; Henry VIII, his wives and progeny, are quickly summarized so you can understand how Lady Jane Grey came to be queen for nine days. There is a clear family tree in the front of the book. What are the themes? Religion, more specifically Protestantism versus Catholicism, faith and power and personal gain. Royalty too. I am not religious, and I do not have faith, and I prefer reading about people from the lower classes, so the chances I could like this book are pretty slim, but I wanted to have a basic understanding of the Tudors. It says on the cover, “If you don’t cry at the end you have a heart of stone.” I guess I have a heart of stone.
So what went wrong? Alison Weir published ten books of historical non-fiction before writing this, her first book of fiction. She knows the topic and she says in her author’s note, “Most of the characters in this novel really existed, and most of the events actually happened. However, where the evidence is scanty or missing, I have used my imagination.” She then clarifies where in the books she has done this. That is exactly the kind of historical fiction I look for. Still, this did not work for me. The author also says she tried to penetrate the minds of her characters, and that is where the problem lies, at least for me. I kept thinking, this character would not do that, she would not say that! The author did not get me inside the head of Lady Jane Grey. I felt that she did exactly what she was told…..until the day she became Queen. Her thoughts and actions were to me unbelievable. Neither could I comprehend the faith she had. Everyone else around her was motivated by personal gain, her parents in particular. I could not believe that her mother came to regret her own behavior. No, I could not empathize with the characters because the author did not succeed in making me see through their eyes. Neither did I find genuine the words the author put in the characters’ mouths. They were too modern. In addition, there was absolutely no humor in this book!
If I read another book by this author it will be non-fiction.
The book was OK, and by GR rating that means it should be given two stars, so that is what I am giving it. Only two stars!
*********************
(ETA: Nurse Ellen is the one and only character I empathized with.)
Through page 50: Will I understand who is who? Will I like reading about the Tudors?
YES, to both questions. Wow, I am impressed at Alison Weir's writing skills. She knows the details so well that she can interweave them in a fascinating and engaging manner. Nurse Ellen is fantastic. I need her as much as Lady Jane Grey does! She so well understands how to explain sex and such to a small child and how to explain more as the child matures. Beautifully written. Relationships are expertly depicted! I am astonished and impressed. I don't like reading about royalty, but this I very much enjoy. Because even royalty are real people with feelings. Please continue in this manner. There is a map and family chart that is simple to comprehend, for a quick glance now and then. What a surprise.
*****************************
On completion:
So what do I like (and not like) about Innocent Traitor? I like that in a relatively short book one gets a quick summary of Tudor history; Henry VIII, his wives and progeny, are quickly summarized so you can understand how Lady Jane Grey came to be queen for nine days. There is a clear family tree in the front of the book. What are the themes? Religion, more specifically Protestantism versus Catholicism, faith and power and personal gain. Royalty too. I am not religious, and I do not have faith, and I prefer reading about people from the lower classes, so the chances I could like this book are pretty slim, but I wanted to have a basic understanding of the Tudors. It says on the cover, “If you don’t cry at the end you have a heart of stone.” I guess I have a heart of stone.
So what went wrong? Alison Weir published ten books of historical non-fiction before writing this, her first book of fiction. She knows the topic and she says in her author’s note, “Most of the characters in this novel really existed, and most of the events actually happened. However, where the evidence is scanty or missing, I have used my imagination.” She then clarifies where in the books she has done this. That is exactly the kind of historical fiction I look for. Still, this did not work for me. The author also says she tried to penetrate the minds of her characters, and that is where the problem lies, at least for me. I kept thinking, this character would not do that, she would not say that! The author did not get me inside the head of Lady Jane Grey. I felt that she did exactly what she was told…..until the day she became Queen. Her thoughts and actions were to me unbelievable. Neither could I comprehend the faith she had. Everyone else around her was motivated by personal gain, her parents in particular. I could not believe that her mother came to regret her own behavior. No, I could not empathize with the characters because the author did not succeed in making me see through their eyes. Neither did I find genuine the words the author put in the characters’ mouths. They were too modern. In addition, there was absolutely no humor in this book!
If I read another book by this author it will be non-fiction.
The book was OK, and by GR rating that means it should be given two stars, so that is what I am giving it. Only two stars!
*********************
(ETA: Nurse Ellen is the one and only character I empathized with.)
Through page 50: Will I understand who is who? Will I like reading about the Tudors?
YES, to both questions. Wow, I am impressed at Alison Weir's writing skills. She knows the details so well that she can interweave them in a fascinating and engaging manner. Nurse Ellen is fantastic. I need her as much as Lady Jane Grey does! She so well understands how to explain sex and such to a small child and how to explain more as the child matures. Beautifully written. Relationships are expertly depicted! I am astonished and impressed. I don't like reading about royalty, but this I very much enjoy. Because even royalty are real people with feelings. Please continue in this manner. There is a map and family chart that is simple to comprehend, for a quick glance now and then. What a surprise.
February 5, 2015
Jane Grey is one of the most tragic figures of Tudor England. She was the great-granddaughter of Henry VII (her grandmother was Mary Tudor, Queen of France and sister to Henry VIII) and a first cousin of Edward VI. When Edward died, she was crowned Queen of England, but was deposed after just nine days by Mary I, and executed a few months later.
Alison Weir explores Jane's life, from her birth to her early death, in her first work of fiction, Innocent Traitor.
The book is not perfectly accurate. I read it as a group read at the Tudor History Lovers group, right after Leandra de Lisle's biography about the Grey sisters; therefore, it was easy to see that Weir mostly embraces the traditional portrayal of Jane as a completely innocent victim and a martyr. While I did not dislike her, I often found Jane to be too perfect to be true and therefore hard to relate to. Similarly, her parents are depicted as cruel and opportunistic, especially Frances, who is a completely negative figure, Weir could have been a little braver in her characterization: I would have liked Jane to be a stronger, even more ambitious figure; and Frances to be more complex.
Apart from these complains, I must say I greatly enjoyed the book. Weir proves to be a rather good storyteller: the plot is always involving and never boring. I really appreciated her choice of narration: the story is told from the point of views of several different characters, like Jane, Frances, Mary Tudor and even I love first person narrators, but they can be frustratingly restricted in historical fictions. Here, the different narrators enrich the story, adding many interesting subplots like Catherine Parr's last years and John Dudley's machinations. I think the characters had rather different voices, and, even if some of them lacked a more complex characterization, I enjoyed all of their narrations.
I would definitely recommend the book if you are interested in Jane Grey and the historical period; but if you like Frances Brandon you should be careful, because here you won't find a sympathetic portrayal of her.
Alison Weir explores Jane's life, from her birth to her early death, in her first work of fiction, Innocent Traitor.
The book is not perfectly accurate. I read it as a group read at the Tudor History Lovers group, right after Leandra de Lisle's biography about the Grey sisters; therefore, it was easy to see that Weir mostly embraces the traditional portrayal of Jane as a completely innocent victim and a martyr. While I did not dislike her, I often found Jane to be too perfect to be true and therefore hard to relate to. Similarly, her parents are depicted as cruel and opportunistic, especially Frances, who is a completely negative figure, Weir could have been a little braver in her characterization: I would have liked Jane to be a stronger, even more ambitious figure; and Frances to be more complex.
Apart from these complains, I must say I greatly enjoyed the book. Weir proves to be a rather good storyteller: the plot is always involving and never boring. I really appreciated her choice of narration: the story is told from the point of views of several different characters, like Jane, Frances, Mary Tudor and even I love first person narrators, but they can be frustratingly restricted in historical fictions. Here, the different narrators enrich the story, adding many interesting subplots like Catherine Parr's last years and John Dudley's machinations. I think the characters had rather different voices, and, even if some of them lacked a more complex characterization, I enjoyed all of their narrations.
I would definitely recommend the book if you are interested in Jane Grey and the historical period; but if you like Frances Brandon you should be careful, because here you won't find a sympathetic portrayal of her.
May 18, 2021
این کتاب، آخرین کتابی بود که قبل از دوران کنکور خوندم :)
خیلی حس عجیبیه... این که یه کتابخون بشینه با خودش فکر کنه و بگه : «خب، بعد از تموم شدن این کتاب، قرار نیست تا یکی دو سال چیزی بخونم...» خیلی دردناکه. با هر صفحه ورق زدن کتاب بیشتر غصه میخوردم و به این فکر میکردم که قراره یکی دو سال، بین کتابهای تست غرق بشم.
عجیبتر از همه اینه که این کتابو هم دوست نداشتم. با خودم فکر میکردم کاش کتاب بهتری انتخاب کرده بودم اما چارهای نبود.
خیلی حس عجیبیه... این که یه کتابخون بشینه با خودش فکر کنه و بگه : «خب، بعد از تموم شدن این کتاب، قرار نیست تا یکی دو سال چیزی بخونم...» خیلی دردناکه. با هر صفحه ورق زدن کتاب بیشتر غصه میخوردم و به این فکر میکردم که قراره یکی دو سال، بین کتابهای تست غرق بشم.
عجیبتر از همه اینه که این کتابو هم دوست نداشتم. با خودم فکر میکردم کاش کتاب بهتری انتخاب کرده بودم اما چارهای نبود.
September 25, 2025
“If only they would all just leave me alone with my books and my letters, I would be content to let life, and the world pass me by”
― Alison Weir, Innocent Traitor
I read this over the weekend and I adored it.
I have to start this review by saying that I am not an expert on lady Jane Grey at all .
In fact, this is the first book I have ever read about her.
I read a lot of reviews for this book before I started writing mine, and I could not find too many people who came into this with so much lack of knowledge. Many of the reviewers seem to know a lot about this era.
It’s one I really did not read much about most of my life. I did read as a kid about Queen Mary, but other than that anything I read about any of the women of that time. Period Was in my adult years.
My interest lies a lot more toward Greek Mythology and Egyptian history .
But lately, I’ve read a couple books about the Tudor Time.
This was my first book on Lady Jane and oh, how I adored her.
I found this story to be deeply engrossing and utterly enthralling.
Usually after reading a book and when posting a review, I’ll try to bring up the negatives and positives, but I really didn’t find that many negatives here.
One point that people have mentioned is, it’s told from the point of view of many narratives . That’s absolutely true and I will freely admit at the very beginning I thought what is the author thinking. I was completely confused, couldn’t remember who anybody was and didn’t understand how I was going to keep my thoughts organized because I couldn’t tell who’s speaking when.
But the thing is it worked really really really really well. It all came together and I wound up really enjoying this unusual way of telling the story. I think you will too.
The thing is, it gives all the characters much more emotional depth because you can hear them thinking, and they tell you of their motivations, and so having so many narrators turned out to be a really good idea because I became fascinated by all of them and of course lady Jane was at the top of my list.
A few people did not like that Jane’s voice as similar as a child and an adult. I found no issues with that.
I should also say that my second favorite book of all time is called “I Cleopatra” and it is a story of the Egyptian queen Cleopatra and it’s narrated by her and it’s 750 pages approximately of Cleopatra. The point is, it’s got a similar format. Cleopatra is the only narrator in that book but she narrates from the time she’s born up until the time she dies. But I like that format where you have the Royal queen or princess telling her own story. I like that format and I always have. It brings everything into focus and makes everything brighter and more vivid so this book fit me to a T.
Now even though I knew virtually nothing – I want to reiterate nothing whatsoever about lady Jane , I did know how it ended for her. I guess I must’ve read it somewhere, but I just knew so I knew where this book was going, and I very childishly hoped that the author would change the ending and make it into a fantasy because she just did such a good job with making us care about Jane.
Jane has always been one of my favorite female names. When I think of the name Jane I think of somebody classically lovely and kind of mysterious. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I was obsessed with Jane Eyre as a child. But I know I was primed to love Jane from the beginning and I did.
The author, writes Jane almost tenderly, and she is presented as a gentle and very innocent girl, with a natural sweetness and a love of knowledge. She is highly intelligent, but unfortunately treated terribly by her mother and father, and the people who do care about her with the exception of Ellen, are not in her life long enough.
But my gosh, the Fuckery in the palace!
You know what I really thought of? It’s like back then the Royal Palace was social media before social media came into existence. I mean if you think social media is toxic, these royal courts are twice as much, quadruple as much , quintuple as much. There’s so much viciousness and backstabbing that it’s hard to believe.
The story is also such a tragedy I mean, at least I knew what was going to happen so I wasn’t really shocked by anything.
If there is one negative in this ( it’s not a negative really actually it’s another positive ) but I would have liked — really liked —
there to be a little bit more after words about how people reacted to what happened. I mean we did get some of that, but I’m talking about Mary.
I found the way Mary was presented in this book fascinating, but I also held a deep fury towards her. I know a Little bit more about Mary than some of the other ladies, but it seems to me she was much more easily led then she realized. But I would like to see the after affects of what this fateful decision did to her, and I would’ve liked to see it written by this author, because I think she would’ve done a great job. Perhaps she’ll write another book of fiction about Mary!
To sum up – I really really enjoyed this. Now I have to put a spoiler up because I need to say something about the ending.
SPOILERS
You know what really got me? Not the Fuckery of Jane‘s father or the last minute regrets of her mother, or Mary herself. It was the executioner! I thought that little bit of the end just made this book really unique . I don’t think I’ve ever read a book before that had a point of view like that. She really does do a great job with developing The individual personalities because the executioner’s point of view is like one minute long and he feels like a fully drawn personality.
Now , I have to go back and edit all of this! My spellcheck is not working properly, so please excuse what will probably be lots of typos. I hope you enjoyed this review and I really do hope it spurs you want to read this because it was excellent.
― Alison Weir, Innocent Traitor
I read this over the weekend and I adored it.
I have to start this review by saying that I am not an expert on lady Jane Grey at all .
In fact, this is the first book I have ever read about her.
I read a lot of reviews for this book before I started writing mine, and I could not find too many people who came into this with so much lack of knowledge. Many of the reviewers seem to know a lot about this era.
It’s one I really did not read much about most of my life. I did read as a kid about Queen Mary, but other than that anything I read about any of the women of that time. Period Was in my adult years.
My interest lies a lot more toward Greek Mythology and Egyptian history .
But lately, I’ve read a couple books about the Tudor Time.
This was my first book on Lady Jane and oh, how I adored her.
I found this story to be deeply engrossing and utterly enthralling.
Usually after reading a book and when posting a review, I’ll try to bring up the negatives and positives, but I really didn’t find that many negatives here.
One point that people have mentioned is, it’s told from the point of view of many narratives . That’s absolutely true and I will freely admit at the very beginning I thought what is the author thinking. I was completely confused, couldn’t remember who anybody was and didn’t understand how I was going to keep my thoughts organized because I couldn’t tell who’s speaking when.
But the thing is it worked really really really really well. It all came together and I wound up really enjoying this unusual way of telling the story. I think you will too.
The thing is, it gives all the characters much more emotional depth because you can hear them thinking, and they tell you of their motivations, and so having so many narrators turned out to be a really good idea because I became fascinated by all of them and of course lady Jane was at the top of my list.
A few people did not like that Jane’s voice as similar as a child and an adult. I found no issues with that.
I should also say that my second favorite book of all time is called “I Cleopatra” and it is a story of the Egyptian queen Cleopatra and it’s narrated by her and it’s 750 pages approximately of Cleopatra. The point is, it’s got a similar format. Cleopatra is the only narrator in that book but she narrates from the time she’s born up until the time she dies. But I like that format where you have the Royal queen or princess telling her own story. I like that format and I always have. It brings everything into focus and makes everything brighter and more vivid so this book fit me to a T.
Now even though I knew virtually nothing – I want to reiterate nothing whatsoever about lady Jane , I did know how it ended for her. I guess I must’ve read it somewhere, but I just knew so I knew where this book was going, and I very childishly hoped that the author would change the ending and make it into a fantasy because she just did such a good job with making us care about Jane.
Jane has always been one of my favorite female names. When I think of the name Jane I think of somebody classically lovely and kind of mysterious. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I was obsessed with Jane Eyre as a child. But I know I was primed to love Jane from the beginning and I did.
The author, writes Jane almost tenderly, and she is presented as a gentle and very innocent girl, with a natural sweetness and a love of knowledge. She is highly intelligent, but unfortunately treated terribly by her mother and father, and the people who do care about her with the exception of Ellen, are not in her life long enough.
But my gosh, the Fuckery in the palace!
You know what I really thought of? It’s like back then the Royal Palace was social media before social media came into existence. I mean if you think social media is toxic, these royal courts are twice as much, quadruple as much , quintuple as much. There’s so much viciousness and backstabbing that it’s hard to believe.
The story is also such a tragedy I mean, at least I knew what was going to happen so I wasn’t really shocked by anything.
If there is one negative in this ( it’s not a negative really actually it’s another positive ) but I would have liked — really liked —
there to be a little bit more after words about how people reacted to what happened. I mean we did get some of that, but I’m talking about Mary.
I found the way Mary was presented in this book fascinating, but I also held a deep fury towards her. I know a Little bit more about Mary than some of the other ladies, but it seems to me she was much more easily led then she realized. But I would like to see the after affects of what this fateful decision did to her, and I would’ve liked to see it written by this author, because I think she would’ve done a great job. Perhaps she’ll write another book of fiction about Mary!
To sum up – I really really enjoyed this. Now I have to put a spoiler up because I need to say something about the ending.
SPOILERS
You know what really got me? Not the Fuckery of Jane‘s father or the last minute regrets of her mother, or Mary herself. It was the executioner! I thought that little bit of the end just made this book really unique . I don’t think I’ve ever read a book before that had a point of view like that. She really does do a great job with developing The individual personalities because the executioner’s point of view is like one minute long and he feels like a fully drawn personality.
Now , I have to go back and edit all of this! My spellcheck is not working properly, so please excuse what will probably be lots of typos. I hope you enjoyed this review and I really do hope it spurs you want to read this because it was excellent.
March 5, 2026
‘ “A beautiful daughter, my lady,” announces the midwife uncertainly. “Healthy and vigorous.” ’
“I should be joyful, thanking God for the safe arrival of a lusty child. Instead, my spirits plummet. All this – for nothing.”
INNOCENT TRAITOR is the fictionalized biography of Lady Jane Grey – the hapless fifteen year old girl at the center of a no-holds barred war between the Roman Catholic papacy and the English version of Martin Luther’s reformed Protestant Church; the young woman relentlessly used as a tool to further her parent’s ambitions in the court of young and sickly King Edward VI and his traitorous regent, John Dudley, who saw himself as a likely replacement for the monarch after Edward’s death.
The tumultuous 16th century following the death of King Henry VIII certainly provided Alison Weir with plenty of meat to prepare a succulent literary repast. But it also provided her with a number of ubiquitous driving themes that guided the participants in those events – sauce for Ms Weir’s literary feast, if you will, that colored the flavour of every event in the century and the conduct and motivations of those who participated in those events, either willingly or under duress.
The three prime directives were, first, the universal sycophantic currying of favour with the king (or queen’s) court, regardless of who might have been sitting on the throne at the time and the positioning of one’s self to ensure a position in the view of any possible successor; second, misogyny, misogyny and more misogyny; and, finally, the bloodthirsty battle between the Roman Catholic Church and the newly reformed Protestants who denied the possibility of a miraculous transubstantiation during the Eucharist and saw the wafer as nothing more than a symbolic representation of Christ’s body.
The shifting first person narratives from chapter to chapter provide interesting perspectives on the rather fast-paced and eventful history of England's monarch from Henry VIII's death through Lady Jane Grey's ascension to the throne of England's "nine day queen" and her ultimate execution on the chopping block by the order of Edward VI's half sister, Queen Mary I.
Entertaining, informative, educational, eminently readable, and (for the most part, at least) quite gripping. A rather spectacular effort for a debut novel, I’d say.
Paul Weiss
“I should be joyful, thanking God for the safe arrival of a lusty child. Instead, my spirits plummet. All this – for nothing.”
INNOCENT TRAITOR is the fictionalized biography of Lady Jane Grey – the hapless fifteen year old girl at the center of a no-holds barred war between the Roman Catholic papacy and the English version of Martin Luther’s reformed Protestant Church; the young woman relentlessly used as a tool to further her parent’s ambitions in the court of young and sickly King Edward VI and his traitorous regent, John Dudley, who saw himself as a likely replacement for the monarch after Edward’s death.
The tumultuous 16th century following the death of King Henry VIII certainly provided Alison Weir with plenty of meat to prepare a succulent literary repast. But it also provided her with a number of ubiquitous driving themes that guided the participants in those events – sauce for Ms Weir’s literary feast, if you will, that colored the flavour of every event in the century and the conduct and motivations of those who participated in those events, either willingly or under duress.
The three prime directives were, first, the universal sycophantic currying of favour with the king (or queen’s) court, regardless of who might have been sitting on the throne at the time and the positioning of one’s self to ensure a position in the view of any possible successor; second, misogyny, misogyny and more misogyny; and, finally, the bloodthirsty battle between the Roman Catholic Church and the newly reformed Protestants who denied the possibility of a miraculous transubstantiation during the Eucharist and saw the wafer as nothing more than a symbolic representation of Christ’s body.
The shifting first person narratives from chapter to chapter provide interesting perspectives on the rather fast-paced and eventful history of England's monarch from Henry VIII's death through Lady Jane Grey's ascension to the throne of England's "nine day queen" and her ultimate execution on the chopping block by the order of Edward VI's half sister, Queen Mary I.
Entertaining, informative, educational, eminently readable, and (for the most part, at least) quite gripping. A rather spectacular effort for a debut novel, I’d say.
Paul Weiss
October 17, 2012
Wow...okay just added a new author to my lists of favorites, Alison Weir now joins Phillippa Gregory and Margaret George as some of my favorite historical fiction authors.. This book was about one of my favorite time periods of history--the Tudor dynasty and the drama, romance and royal misdoings by King Henry VII, his wives, and his children. In this novel the King has passed away and the son from Queen Jane Seymour, Prince Edward becomes King, however Edward is a sickly boy and doesnt live past fifteen and never fathers an heir..It is in this turmoil that our heroine the Lady Jane Grey is forced through the manipulations of her father and the Duke of Northumberland to take the crown and rule England..This sad tale recounts the treachery and scheming it took from "adults" to selfishly convince an entire nation that the King's own daughters Lady Mary and Elizabeth were unfit to take the crown and that it should pass to the great neice of the King..As the church of England was changed and reformed so often during King Henry VII's rule it was imperative from King Edward's dying wishes that the Lady Mary not be ascended to the throne as she is a devout Catholic and the church of England is now Protestant. So the Lady Jane becomes Queen of England, is married to the Duke of Northumberland's son and poised to be a puppet for the manipulative men of the privy council until the Lady Mary resurfaces, reclaims her throne and begins her reign as Bloody Mary starting with the beheading of her own cousin the Lady Jane Grey, only fifteen and only in power for nine days...Although the ending of the book is well known throughout history Weir draws out her characters, in particular the devious Frances Brandon (Lady Jane Grey's mother) and makes you believe you know these people, share their fears, dreams and hopes...Extremely rich descriptions of royalty and court life and fashion as well as changing viewpoints that tell the whole story...Recommended for lovers of tragic heroines..
April 7, 2010
Not quite finished with this, but don't care for it all that much. It utilizes an extremely contrived narrative perspective. It rotates among first-person narration from many perspectives, but the problem is that all narrators speak in the dramatic present, as if the speaker were speaking at the moment of the experience. I don't care for that anyway, but when one of the narrators (the main one), Lady Jane Grey, starts her story when she is three, and the vocabulary, sentence structure, and capacity for self-reflection are VASTLY too advanced for a child that age, it's just not believable. If we are supposed to consider that it's actually a retrospective, and the speaker is telling the story long after the fact, but using the present tense for dramatic effect, then we have to buy that a dead narrator is telling the story and that she can remember word-for-word conversations and so forth from years before. Of course that is impossible, so the best we can hope for is that the narration is supposed to be a retrospective, but the narrators (all of them, but especially Jane Grey) are telling the stories that they have reconstructed from highly questionable memories; thus, we are really getting the story of what Jane Grey would have thought and felt had she had those experiences as a much older person. Silly. The older Jane gets, the more obnoxious she gets, too--she's a whiny, self-satisfied, holier-than-thou type. Unpleasant. I am listening to the audio version, which I got because it features three of my favorite readers (Davina Porter, Jill Tanner, and Bianca Amato), and the reading is excellent, but possibly not worth the trouble for a dull and unbelievable book.
January 17, 2025
Historical fiction about the short tragic life of Lady Jane Grey, the “innocent traitor" of the title, who was Queen of England for nine days. It is told through multiple perspectives. Lady Jane is portrayed as a strong and willful young woman who values books, learning, and religious faith. As the novel progresses, she evolves from a precocious child to a political pawn at the hands of her ambitious parents and the manipulative power-broker John Dudley.
The novel explores the role of religion, court intrigue, gender politics, and marriage. I am impressed by the author’s ability to maintain dramatic tension despite most, if not all, readers knowing the outcome ahead of time. It was easy for me to become invested in what happened to Jane. It is largely based on documented historical facts, with a few liberties taken for dramatic interest, as the author acknowledges in the Afterword. The Tudor period is portrayed beautifully. Though based in the 16th century, it can easily be connected to modern topics, such as political manipulation, religious extremism, female agency, and power dynamics.
The novel explores the role of religion, court intrigue, gender politics, and marriage. I am impressed by the author’s ability to maintain dramatic tension despite most, if not all, readers knowing the outcome ahead of time. It was easy for me to become invested in what happened to Jane. It is largely based on documented historical facts, with a few liberties taken for dramatic interest, as the author acknowledges in the Afterword. The Tudor period is portrayed beautifully. Though based in the 16th century, it can easily be connected to modern topics, such as political manipulation, religious extremism, female agency, and power dynamics.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,030 reviews