I have many mixed feelings about this book.
I am aware of the importance of aiming for the highest and not killing your ideal (through dismissive cynicism, for example). So I have tried to keep an open heart and have filled here and there her blunt exhortations with more biblical context and depth (which made them more swallowable). I guess I have much to learn from the book: being a christlike servant, loving and open-handed because I am already secure, shaking my egocentric tendencies, being a better watcher over my people and my home, more disciplined and diligent, more intentional with my time, health and other resources. And I was glad to refresh the wisdom in the beginning chapters on the word, prayer and obedience to God. Also, there are many beautiful and important Bible references which make up much of the book’s worth for me. (In fact, the book appeared as a by-product of her fervent desire of reading through the Bible looking for what it tells her as a woman to be and to do, as she was starting her faith-journey, which I find commendable).
But I do have some problems with the book.
Elizabeth George seems to be the sort of person that simply acts unwaveringly and committed upon every conviction she receives (such a foreign experience for me). I guess we need this sort of motivating inspiration and I hope it catches. I’d like catching it now, with the turn of the year.
But she does not let much sense of struggle leak through to us. And, perhaps as part of the culture of her generation, encourages to never ever talk about what’s bad in your family (and I do not mean demeaningly, which is obviously wrong). Living in a community that is not open about their struggles can feel really daunting when you carry many battles from within and without - especially for younger women, who might have fed themselves unchecked on diets of strong idealisms about family life before marriage. Some problems take a really long time to be fixed and there are a myriad of intricate contributing factors, the author’s seem to be fixed so straightforwardly. I believe we need to hear more in churches that that struggle is real and “normal”, otherwise we are all living in solitary desperation that everybody else is put together, but we are somehow left out. (Whereas the gospels send a completely different message: the church is supposed to be here for the sick in need of a Doctor, the white facade is a hypocrite’s tomb, “come to Me, all you who are weary and burdened”, grace is for the desperate who finally sees that all his work falls short). So I think more vulnerability on her part might have helped. I can't say I have met much insight about the power of grace in the book.
The second issue is connected to this crazy drive with efficiency. “Never let it rest. 'Til your good is better and your better is best”. She uses the principle of momentum to encourage you to never stop so as not to be harder to start again. Well… I have been an efficiency-addict much of my adult life and I can tell that efficiency and the desire to never stop from your work is a terrible goal when it comes to relationships, especially when it comes to raising multiple small children. And efficiency also has a hard toll on the ability for stillness which is crucial for a vibrant faith and prayer life. I guess the world has changed a lot since that generation and with all the infinite good things we can do with our time, that it is impossible to set and keep right priorities without a healthy dose of stillness and rest. The book The Ruthless elimination of hurry addresses excellently this issues and it is very relevant for our times.
My third issue has to do with the colossal way the society has changed after the industrial and technological revolutions, which have freed women of much of their hard time-consuming labor in the home to feed and cloth her family. It freed the children to become educated, girls too. It lowered drastically the number of years of a women’s life spent in the vulnerable state of being pregnant or breastfeeding/caring for an infant (through contraception). It changed the need for physical power (men power) to brain power, which both sexes posses equally. The average household cannot live by one income. Etc. So it is only natural that women are working more and more outside of home. The book does not acknowledge much of this change, many of her exhortations do not apply to this reality. But I do agree that our primary input should be in the lives of our husband and children.
Fourthly, I have also an issue with the way she described biblical submission. We have an example of perfect submission, Christ. Yet Christ was not self-effacing or spineless. He was both a lion and a lamb. I believe husbands need women who speak up the truth (and my husband agrees), who they can contend with, who can challenge their opinions in a respectful, loving way.
And last of all, I didn’t find her writing style captivating. It is not what moves my heart. More like a checklist of things to think about, or put on your planner, plus a good selection of bible verses. It has its place, though. (For example, it does work well as a springboard to search deeper into scripture certain themes and character traits). I do not intend to throw the baby with the bathwater and mean to learn what I can from her. She has reached an old age trying to apply scripture to her life.